Loading ITAT cases…
257 tribunal orders from the Raipur bench in 2021.
Showing 40 of 257 orders. Use the months below for the rest.
The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal due to the declaration filed under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act. The revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The Revenue did not raise any objection to the withdrawal application.
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn based on the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn based on the provisions of the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals, noting no objection from the Revenue. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The assessee was permitted to withdraw the appeal as they had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
The assessee sought to withdraw the appeal as they had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and completed the necessary formalities. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
The tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The learned DR did not raise any objection to the withdrawal application.
The assessee sought to withdraw the appeal before the Tribunal. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal. Therefore, the Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal.
The assessee sought to withdraw the appeal to avail the benefits of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The Tribunal permitted the withdrawal as the Revenue did not object.
The assessee sought to withdraw the appeals after opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme, which resulted in a refund. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
The tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal as they had opted for the 'Direct Tax Vivas Se Vishwas Scheme 2020'. The revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
The tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal as they had opted for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme. The revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
The tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The Revenue did not raise any objection to the withdrawal request.
The assessee sought disposal of the appeal due to opting for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal of its appeal.
The tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal as they had opted for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme. The revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
The assessee requested disposal of the appeal due to opting for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal of its appeal.
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw their appeals as per the provisions of the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal as it had opted for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
The assessee sought permission to withdraw the appeal due to the declaration filed under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal as requested. The Revenue did not raise any objection to the withdrawal.
The assessee sought to withdraw the appeals after opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme, which resulted in a refund. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
The tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal as the matter was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw their appeals as per the provisions of the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw their appeals as per the provisions of the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal as they had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and filed the necessary applications. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
The tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and had filed the necessary applications. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
The assessee sought to withdraw the appeal as they had opted for the VSV Scheme and submitted the necessary forms. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
The Tribunal permitted the Revenue to withdraw its appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw their appeals as per the provisions of the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The assessee sought to withdraw the appeal due to having availed the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The Revenue did not object, and the Tribunal permitted the withdrawal of the appeal.
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal as no objection was raised by the Revenue. The appeal was consequently dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal held that the assessee's objects, including promoting trade, protecting members' interests, and organizing awareness programs, amounted to the advancement of general public utility. It was also held that leasing developed plots to members based on contributions does not disqualify the assessee from charitable status.
The Tribunal held that only the profit element embedded in the unaccounted receipts is taxable, not the entire gross amount. The lower authorities erred in taxing the full surrendered amount.
The Tribunal held that only the profit element embedded in the unaccounted receipts is taxable, not the entire gross amount. The lower authorities erred in taxing the full surrendered amount.
The Tribunal held that only the profit element embedded in the unaccounted receipts is taxable, not the entire gross amount. The lower authorities erred in taxing the full surrendered amount.
The Tribunal held that only the profit element embedded in the unaccounted receipts is taxable, not the entire gross amount. The lower authorities erred in taxing the full surrendered amount.
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in enhancing income without notice and in directing action for years not under appeal. The Tribunal also found that the assessee could not be prevented from claiming higher service tax deductions if otherwise permissible and remitted the issue to the AO for verification.
The Tribunal held that only the profit element embedded in the unaccounted receipts is taxable, not the entire gross amount. The lower authorities erred in taxing the full surrendered amount.