SHRI MOHAN MOTWANI,BHATAPARA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, BHATAPARA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn based on the provisions of the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT for AY 2008-09. Subsequently, the assessee sought to withdraw the appeal under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, having paid the due amount as per the scheme's certificate.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is entitled to withdraw the appeal filed before the Tribunal under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme after fulfilling the scheme's conditions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
The Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR – VIRTUAL COURT
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-II, Raipur on 01-06-2017 in relation to the Assessment Year 2008-09. 2. Before us, the assessee has filed a letter dated 30.09.2021 seeking permission to withdraw the appeal under ‘Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme’ under The Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The relevant contents of such letter, read as under : “In the above matter, it is respectfully submitted before your honour as under for the kind and the favourable consideration:
2 Mohan Motwani
That an appeal has been filed before the Hon’ble Bench on 05.10.2020 vide Appeal No.ITA/87/RPR/2020. 2. That an application was filed under Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 in Form 1 & Form 2 before Hon’ble PCIT Raipur-1. He issued certificate on Form No.3 on 20.09.2021 vide Certificate No.539126381200921, it is enclosed.
That amount payable as per above certificate is Rs.1,28,022/-. This has been paid by the assessee on 30.09.2021 at ICICI Bank, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi BSR code 6390340, Challan no.09220. 4. Therefore, as per the provisions of Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 it is prayed to kindly allow to withdraw the above appeal filed before the Hon’ble Bench.”
On perusal of the above letter and having no objection from the side of ld. DR, we allow the request of assessee to withdraw
the appeal.
In the result, the appeal is dismissed as ‘withdrawn’. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 24th November, 2021 (S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI) (R.S.SYAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT पुणे Pune; "दनांक Dated : 24th November, 2021 Satish
3 Mohan Motwani
आदेश क" क" क" "ितिलिप क" "ितिलिप "ितिलिप अ"ेिषत "ितिलिप अ"ेिषत अ"ेिषत / Copy of the Order is forwarded to : अ"ेिषत आदेश आदेश आदेश अपीलाथ" / The Appellant;
""यथ" / The Respondent; 2. आयकर आयु"(अपील) /
The CIT (Appeals)-II, Raipur
The PCIT-II, Raipur
DR, ITAT, Raipur; गाड" फाईल / Guard file. 6. //// आदेशानुसार आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, आदेशानुसार आदेशानुसार //// Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune
Date
Draft dictated on 24-11-2021 Sr.PS
Draft placed before author 24-11-2021 Sr.PS
Draft proposed & placed JM before the second member
Draft discussed/approved JM by Second Member.
Approved Draft comes to Sr.PS the Sr.PS/PS
Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS
Date of uploading order Sr.PS
File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS
Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk
Date on which file goes to the A.R.
Date of dispatch of Order.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026