Loading ITAT cases…
118 orders · Page 2 of 3
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw its appeal as it had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme. The appeal was consequently dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal as the dispute was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and the appeal was pending as on the specified date. The revenue had no objection to the withdrawal.
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeals as the assessee had opted for settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme-2020. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeals as the assessee had opted for settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme-2020. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeals as they had opted for settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme-2020. The appeals were accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's prayer to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's prayer to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal as the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme' petition was accepted. The Revenue did not object to this request.
The Tribunal found reasonable cause for the delay and condoned it. The matter was remitted back to the CIT(A) for adjudication on merits.
The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal as the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme' petition was accepted. The revenue did not object to this request.
The Tribunal found that the development expenses paid to three parties were supported by invoices and TDS was deducted. Expenses paid to JDA were supported by challans. The revenue failed to pinpoint specific missing bills, making the ad-hoc disallowance unjustified.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal as the assessee had approached the department to settle the matter under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme'.
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas' scheme and had received a certificate for settlement. The revenue had no objection to the withdrawal.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal as the matter was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal held that the revenue failed to discharge its onus to prove that the assessee made investments exceeding the amount shown in the books of account. The statements of sellers did not mention the assessee's name, and no other corroborative evidence was produced.
The Tribunal held that the transaction could not be considered bogus solely based on a general statement from an investigation wing without corroborative evidence. The assessee had provided documentary evidence for the purchase, dematerialization, and sale of shares.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The Revenue did not raise any specific objection to this request.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The Revenue did not raise any specific objection to this request.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The revenue did not raise any specific objection to this request.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The revenue did not raise any specific objection to this request.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The Revenue did not raise any specific objection to this request.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The Revenue did not raise any specific objection to this request.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's prayer to withdraw the appeal as the matter was being settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's prayer to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's prayer to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The Revenue did not raise any specific objection to this request.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The Revenue did not raise any specific objection to this request.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The Revenue did not raise any specific objection to this request.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The Revenue did not raise any specific objection to this request.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The Revenue did not raise any specific objection to this request.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The Revenue did not raise any specific objection to this request.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
The Tribunal held that if cash is reflected in the books of account and the books are not rejected, then the opening cash balance cannot be disallowed without reopening the assessment of the year in which it was introduced. Therefore, the addition made in the current year was not sustainable.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's prayer to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeals as the assessee had opted for settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme-2020. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeals as the assessee had opted for settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme-2020. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeals as the assessee had opted for settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme-2020. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.