JAIPUR SAHAKARI KRAYA VIKRAYA SAMITI LTD.,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5-4, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for assessment year 2008-09. The assessee subsequently filed an application to withdraw the appeal as they had opted for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme'.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can withdraw their appeal due to opting for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme'.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 766/JP/2019
ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A)-2, Jaipur dated 29.03.2019 for the assessment year 2008-09. 2. Hearing of the appeal was concluded through video conference in view of the prevailing situation of Covid-19 pandemic. 3. The ld. Counsel for the assessee furnished application for withdrawal of this appeal. The contention made in the said application reads as under:-
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sunita Bhagat Proprietor Of Krishab Impex vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Arun Aloysius Barnes vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 14 Oct 2026
- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026