Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 648 to 650/JP/2018
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR Jh lanhi xkslkbZ] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 648 to 650/JP/2018 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2007-08 to 2010-11 cuke M/s Ram Ratan Prajapat, HUF, The ITO, Vs. Village-Sanwatsar, Madanganj, Ward-1, Kishangarh. Kishangarh.. LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AARHR 1174 F vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Shri Devang Gargieya (ITP) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Smt. Monisha Choudhary (ACIT) a lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 05/02/2021 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement : 08/02/2021 vkns'k@ ORDER PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. These are three appeals filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT(A), Ajmer all dated 01.02.2018 for Assessment Years 2007-08 to 2010-11 respectively.
The ld A/R has stated at the Bar that the assessee has filed a petition under “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020” to settle the aforesaid matter and the said petition has recently been accepted and Form 3 as been issued by the competent authority. It was accordingly requested that the assessee may be allowed to withdraw the present appeals. to 650/JP/2018 2 M/s Ram Ratan Prajapat HUF vs. ITO 3. The ld. DR is heard who did not raise any specific objection in accepting the said prayer of withdrawal of appeals by the assessee.
In view of above, the prayer of the assessee is accepted and the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.