SHRI RAJENDRA SINGH,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6-2, JAIPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 944/JPR/2018Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 February 2021AY 2009-102 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A) order for AY 2009-10. The assessee subsequently filed a petition under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020' to settle the matter.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee can withdraw an appeal filed before the ITAT due to settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR

Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 944/JP/2018

For Appellant: Shri Shrawan Kumar Gupta (Adv.) jktLo dh vksj ls@
Hearing: 08/02/2021Pronounced: 08/02/2021

PER BENCH: The assessee has filed the present appeal against the order of ld. CIT(A)-II, Jaipur dated 21.05.2018 for the assessment year 2009-10.

2.

The ld A/R has stated at the Bar that the assessee has filed a petition under “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020” to settle the aforesaid matter and the said petition has recently been accepted and Form 3 as been issued by the competent authority. It was accordingly requested that the assessee may be allowed to withdraw the present appeal. 2 Sh. Rajendra Singh vs. ITO 3. The ld. DR is heard who did not raise any specific objection in accepting the said prayer of withdrawal of appeals by the assessee.

4.

In view of above, the prayer of the assessee is accepted and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →