M/S KINU BABA JEWELLERY P. LTD.,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD-1(4), JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw its appeal as it had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme. The appeal was consequently dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for Assessment Year 2008-09. The assessee later filed an application to withdraw the appeal, citing eligibility and participation in the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is eligible to withdraw its appeal under the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme. The primary issue is the procedural withdrawal of the appeal due to opting for a dispute resolution scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES “B”, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 676/JP/2019
ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-I, Jaipur dated 18/02/2019 for the A.Y. 2008-09.
The hearing of the appeal was concluded through video conference in view of the prevailing situation of Covid-19 Pandemic.
The ld. Counsel for the assessee furnished application for withdrawal of this appeal. The contention in the said application reads as under: “It is most humbly submitted that the quantum appeal of the assessee for A.Y. 2008-09 is pending before the Hon'ble Bench in ITA No: 676/JP/19.
2 ITA 676/JP/2019_ Kinu Baba Jewellery P Ltd. Vs ITO It is submitted that the Hon'ble Finance Minister in her budget speech of 2020 announced a dispute resolution scheme Vivad Se Vishwas. The scheme was formulated into The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (DTVSV) on 17th March, 2020. The Act provides that any assessee whose appeal was pending as on 31st January, 2020 can settle his dispute by filing a declaration u/s 4(1) of DTVSV in Form-1 and Form-2. The above mentioned appeal was pending as on 31stJanuary, 2020.The appeal has not been decided till date, therefore, the assessee is eligible for opting the scheme. The assessee filed declaration in Form-1 and Form-2 on 12th August, 2020 before the Designated Authority. On 31st January, 2021, the assessee received Form-3 i.e. Form for Certificate u/s 5(1) of DTVSV from Designated Authority. Section 4(2) of DTVSV, provides that where declaration has been filed by the assessee the appeal shall be deemed to be withdrawn from the date on which Certificate u/s 5(1) of DTVSV is issued by the Designated Authority. Hence, in the present case, the appeal of the assessee stands withdrawn on 31st January, 2021. In view of above you are requested to kindly treat the appeal of the assessee to be withdrawn and necessary action may please be taken.
Submitted most respectfully
For Kinu Baba Jewellery Pvt. Ltd. (Shivangi Samdhani) A/R”
3 ITA 676/JP/2019_ Kinu Baba Jewellery P Ltd. Vs ITO 4. The ld DR has raised no objection if the appeal of the assessee is allowed to be withdrawn.
Therefore, in view of the fact that the assessee has already approached the department to settle the matter under Vivad Se Vishwas scheme, we permit the assessee to withdraw its appeal. Accordingly, the appeal of the assesses is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, this appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 10th February, 2021
Sd/- Sd/- ¼foØe flag ;kno½ ¼lanhi x®lkÃa½ (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) ys[kk lnL;@Accountant Member U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 10/02/2021 *Ranjan आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू vihykFkhZ@The Appellant- M/s Kinu Baba Jewellery Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur. 1. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- The ITO, Ward-1(4), Jaipur. 2. vk;dj vk;qDr@ CIT 3. vk;dj vk;qDr¼vihy½@The CIT(A) 4. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत 5. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File (ITA No. 676/JP/2019) 6. vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,
सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेज. त्महपेजतंत
More judgments on Section 4(1)
- Sbi, (Erstwhile Sbbj), Baran vs ITO (TDS), KotaITA 143/JPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Belathur Srinivasaiyengar Rangaiyengar… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), MysoreITA 574/BANG/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed16 Dec 2025AY 2017-18
- Sanjivani Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahkari… vs ITO Ward-2, BhandaraITA 198/NAG/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed27 May 2025AY 2019-20
- Kantibhai Punjyabhai Patel HUF, Surat vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(7), SuratITA 723/SRT/2023[2017-18]Status: Disposed22 May 2025AY 2017-18
- Babu Thomas, Shivamogga vs Income Tax Officer, Ward -4, ShivamoggaITA 1434/BANG/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed17 Oct 2024AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- Harinder Singh Rawat vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026