Andhra Pradesh High Court Judgments — 2025

The High Court noted the submission by the Income Tax Department's counsel that the appeal was being withdrawn due to monetary limits as per a CBIC Circular. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.

The High Court noted the submission by the Income Tax Department's counsel regarding instructions to withdraw the appeal due to monetary limits. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.

The High Court noted the submission by the Income Tax Department's counsel that the appeal was to be withdrawn due to monetary limits as per a CBIC circular. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.

The High Court noted the submission by the Income Tax Department's counsel regarding the withdrawal of the appeal due to monetary limits as per a CBIC circular. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.

The High Court noted the submission by the Income Tax Department's counsel that the appeal was being withdrawn. The withdrawal was based on instructions from the Department due to the tax effect involved and a related NCLT decision.

The High Court noted the submission by the Income Tax Department's counsel that the appeal was being withdrawn. Based on this, the Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.

The High Court recorded the submission of the Income Tax Department's counsel stating that the appeal was to be withdrawn. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

The High Court noted the submission by the Income Tax Department's counsel regarding withdrawal of the appeal due to monetary limits as per a CBIC Circular. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

The High Court noted the submission by the Income Tax Department's counsel that the appeal was to be withdrawn. The withdrawal was based on the tax effect being covered by a decision of the NCLT.

The High Court recorded the submission of the Income Tax Department's counsel regarding the withdrawal of the appeal due to monetary limits as per CBIC Circular. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

The High Court recorded the submission of the Income Tax Department to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

The High Court noted the submission by the Income Tax Department's counsel that the appeal was to be withdrawn due to monetary limits as per CBIC Circular No. 5 of 2024. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

The High Court granted the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

The High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the appellant to work out remedies if any adverse orders were passed.

The High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the appellant to work out remedies if any adverse orders were passed.

The High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the appellant to work out remedies if any adverse orders were passed.

The High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. This decision was based on instructions from the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and a certificate issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, indicating the appeal was to be withdrawn.

The High Court, upon a request from the appellant's counsel, granted permission to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was consequently dismissed as withdrawn.

The High Court granted the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal. The withdrawal was based on the ground of monetary limits. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

The High Court granted the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal. The withdrawal was based on the ground of monetary limits prescribed by the department.

The High Court granted permission to the appellant's counsel to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was consequently dismissed as withdrawn.

The High Court granted permission to the appellant (Income Tax Department) to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

The learned Standing Counsel for the appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal on the grounds of monetary limits. Permission was granted by the Court.

The High Court granted the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn on the grounds of monetary limits.

The High Court granted permission to the appellant's counsel to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

The High Court granted permission to the appellant's counsel to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

The High Court granted permission to the Standing Counsel for the appellant to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

The Tribunal held that once a matter has reached finality under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, it cannot be reopened under Section 263 or any other provision of law. Therefore, the revisional authority's action was found fault with.

The High Court granted the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, and any interim orders were deemed vacated.

The High Court granted permission to the appellant to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn based on the appellant's request due to monetary limits as per a circular.

The High Court granted permission to the appellant (Commissioner of Income Tax) to withdraw the appeal. The withdrawal was based on the monetary limits prescribed by a circular.

The High Court granted permission to the learned Standing Counsel for the appellant to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

The High Court granted permission to the Standing Counsel for the appellant to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

The High Court granted the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the court.

The learned Standing Counsel for the appellant (Income Tax Department) sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The Court granted permission and accordingly dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.

The learned Standing Counsel for the appellant (Commissioner of Income Tax) sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The Court granted permission for the withdrawal.

The High Court granted permission to the learned Standing Counsel for the appellant to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

The learned Standing Counsel for the appellant (Commissioner of Income Tax) sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The Court granted permission and accordingly dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.

The High Court granted permission to the appellant's counsel to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the Income Tax Tribunal Appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

The High Court granted permission to the appellant to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the Income Tax Tribunal Appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

The High Court granted permission to the appellant to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the Income Tax Tribunal Appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

The High Court granted permission to the appellant (Income Tax Department) to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

The learned Standing Counsel for the appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal. Permission was granted by the Court.