COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX-II, VISAKHAPATNAM. vs. M/S PRATHYUSHA ASSOICATES SHIPPING PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAP
What did the High Court hold?
The learned Standing Counsel for the appellant (Commissioner of Income Tax) sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The Court granted permission for the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The Commissioner of Income Tax filed an appeal before the High Court challenging an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal was against an assessment year of 1994-1995.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal filed by the Revenue should be allowed to be withdrawn.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TUESDAY, o TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.KRISHNA MOHAN AND HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 365 OF 2012 Appeal under Section 260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the Order dated 10-06-2008 passed in ITA.No.621A/izag/2002 (Assessment year 1994-1995) by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, Visakhapatnam, filed challenging the Order dated 27-06-2002 passed in ITA.No.07/J/R2A/SP/02-03, by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-ll, Visakhapatnam, which was filed against the Order dated 11-03-2002 passed U/s.143 (3) read with Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Assessment year 1994-1995) by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2(1), Visakhapatnam. Between: Commissioner of Income Tax-ll, Visakhapatnam. ...Petitioner AND M/s.Prathyusha Associates Shipping Private Limited, 25-40-12, Gangulavari Street, Near Laxmi Talkies, Visakhapatnam - 530 001. ...Respondent
Counsel for the Appellant : Sri Anup Koushik Karavadi ■*r *> f . f (Standing Counsel for Income Tax ■ #- I I ■¥ r. f Department) ■f\: ■ V, Counsel for the Respondent : -- The Court made the following:
APHC010436282012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3516] TUESDAY. THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 365/2012 Between: Commissioner Of Incometax-ii, Visakhapatnam. ...APPELLANT AND M/s Prathyusha Assoicates Shipping Private Limited Visakhap ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1.ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI Counsel for the Respondent: 1.
2 HBKM,J & HVN,J I.T.T.A.No.365 of 2012 The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Krishna Mohan) The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Appeal. Permission is accorded. 2. 3. Accordingly, the Income Tax Tribunal Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. As a sequel. Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR A //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Visakhapatnam. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-ll, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Assistant Commissioner Visakhapatnam. 4. One CC to Sri Anup Koushik Karavadi Advocate [OPUC] 5. Three CD Copies Visakhapatnam Bench of Income Tax Circle-2(1) BSV sree
HIGH COURT DATE0:28/01/2025 I 02jUM2n?5 § Current Section JUDGMENT ITTA.No.365 of 2012 DISMISSING THE ITTA AS WITHDRAWN
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026