COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 vs. M/S. PRATYUSHA ASSOCIATES,
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court granted permission to the learned Standing Counsel for the appellant to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Commissioner of Income Tax filed an appeal before the High Court challenging an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal pertains to the assessment year 2003-2004.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the withdrawal of the appeal by the appellant before the High Court.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.KRISHNA MOHAN AND HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 545 OF 2012 Appeal filed under Section 260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 praying that the High Court may be pleased to allow the appeal by duly setting aside the Order dated 25-01-2010 passed in ITA.No.47/Vizag/2007 (Assessment year 2003-2004) by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, Visakhapatnam, filed challenging the Order dated 07-12-2006 passed in iTA.No.55/ACIT/C-2(1)/VSP/06-07, by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, Visakhapatnam, which filed against the Order dated 29-03-2006 passed U/s.143 (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Assessment year 2003-2004) PAN No. AAEFP 4036D by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2(1), Visakhapatnam. Between: Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Visakhapatnam. ...Petitioner AND M/s.Pratyusha Associates, No.25-40-12, ‘Pratyusha House’ Gangulavari Street, Visakhapatnam. ...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant ; Sri Anup Koushik Karavadi
(Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department) Counsel for the Respondent : -- The Court made the following:JUDGMENT
Af'HC010238462012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3516] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 545/2012 Between: ...APPELLANT Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 AND ...RESPONDENT M/s Pratyusha Associates Counsel for the Appellant: 1.YN VIVEKANANDA Counsel for the Respondent: 1.
2 HBKM,J & HVN.J I.T.T.A.No.545 of 2012 The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Krishna Mohan) The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Appeal. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Income Tax Tribunal Appeal is dismissed withdrawn. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. as As a sequel. Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR t a //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, Visakhapatnam. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circ[e-2(1), Visakhapatnam. 4. One CC to Sri Anup Koushik Karavadi, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Three CD Copies BSV ns
HIGH COURT BSV DATED:28/01/2025 JUDGMENT ITTA.No.545 of 2012 DISMISSING THE ITTA AS WITHDRAWN
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026