COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I vs. DR.G.A.RAMA RAJU
What did the High Court hold?
The learned Standing Counsel for the appellant (Commissioner of Income Tax) sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The Court granted permission and accordingly dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Commissioner of Income Tax filed an appeal before the High Court challenging an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal pertains to the assessment year/block period from 01.04.1989 to 26.08.1999.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue. No substantive legal issues were adjudicated.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
T>» IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.KRISHNA MOHAN AND HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY LNCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 516 OF 201? Appeal filed under Section 260 A of the praying that the High Court may be pleased to allow setting Income Tax Act, 1961 the appeal by duly passed in IT aside the Order dated 29-08-2008 (SS)A.No. 16A/izag/2003 (Assessment yearBlock Period 01.04.1989 to 26.08.1999) by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, Visakhapatnam, filed challenging the Order dated Appeal No.0203/CC-VSP/CIT(A)-I/02-03, by the Commissioner Tax (Appeals)-I, Hyderabad, which 15-01-2003 passed in of Income filed against the Order dated Act, 1961 (Assessment yearBlock Period 01.04.1989 to 26.08.1999) by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Visakhapatnam. 29-07-2002 passed U/S.158BD of the Income Tax Between: Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Visakhapatnam. ...Petitioner AND M/s.Krishna IVF Clinic, Dr.G.A.Rama Raju Visakhapatnam. Krishna Nagar, ...Respondent
: Sri Anup Koushik Karavadi Counsel for the Appellant (Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department) . Counsel for the Respondent : None appeared The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
\ APHC010212642012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) .V [3516] ■J?2- TUESDAY. THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 516/2017 Between; Commissioner Of Income Tax-i ...APPELLANT AND Dr G A Rama Raju Counsel for the Appellant: 1.ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI Counsel for the Respondent: ...RESPONDENT 1.
2 HBKM,J & HVN.J I.T.T.A.No.516of2012 The Court made the foilowinq: JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Krishna Mohan) The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Appeal. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Income Tax Tribunal Appeal is dismissed withdrawn. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. as As a sequel. Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION-OFFICER To, 1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench Visakhapatnam. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, Hyderabad. 3. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1 Visakhapatnam. 4. One CC to Sri Anup Koushik Karavadi Advocate [OPUC] 5. Three CD Copies BSV vna
HIGH COURT DATED;28/01/2025 JUDGMENT ITTA.No.516 of 2012 OF O o i JUN DISMISSING THE ITTA AS WITHDRAWN
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026