THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.TIRUMALA MILK PRODUCTS PVT LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court granted permission to the appellant (Income Tax Department) to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Department filed an appeal before the High Court challenging an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal was filed against an order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), which in turn was against an order passed by the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the withdrawal of the appeal by the Income Tax Department due to monetary limits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.KRISHNA MOHAN AND HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 231 OF 2016 ■'•a Appeal under Section 260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 the Order dated 18-12-2015 passed in ITA.No.137A/izag/2013 (Assessment year 2009-2010) by the income Tax App&liate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, Visakhapatnam, filed challenging the Order dated 22-01-2013 passed in ITA.No.0177/CIT(A)/GNT/11-12v,:b^^^^^^ Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Guntur, which was filed against the Order dated 30-11-2011 passed U/s.143 (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Assessment year 2009- 2010) by the Joint Commissioner of W Tax, Range-2, Guntur. Between: The Principal Commissioner of income Tax, Guntur. ...Appellant AND M/s.Tirumala Milk Products Pyt. Ltd., Prakash Nagar, Narsaraopet, Guntur District. .S'-- k-?' ...Respondent
Counsel for the Appellant : Sri Y N Vivekananda (Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department) Counsel for the Respondent : Sri N V Shravan Kumar The Court made the following:
V APHC010016442016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3516] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 231/2016 Between: The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax ...APPELLANT AND M/s Tirumala Milk Products Pvt Ltd Counsel for the Appellant: 1.YN VIVEKANANDA ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Respondent: 1.
2 4^ HBKM,J & HVN,J I.T.T.A.No.231 of 2016 The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (PerHon’ble Sri Justice B. Krishna Mohan) The learned counsel for the Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Appeal on the ground of monetary limits. 2. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no 3. order as to costs. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. SOI- SVSR MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, Visakhapatnam. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Guntur. 3. The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-2, Guntur. 4. One CC to Sri Y N Vivekananda, Standing Counsel for Income Tax [OPUC]. [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri N V Shravan; Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Three CD Copies BSV AL
f HIGH COURT DATED:25/02/2025 JUDGMENT i ITTA.No.231 of 2016 I DISMISSING THE ITTA AS WITHDRAWN \WITHOUT COSTS i i
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026