PR COMM OF INCOME TAX-1
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court granted the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the court.
What were the facts?
The appellant, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, sought to withdraw the appeal filed before the High Court. The appeal was against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the assessment year 2007-2008.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal based on monetary limits. The court's decision revolved around granting or denying this withdrawal request.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 272 OF 201 fi Appeal under Section 260 A of the Income Tax Act by the .Order dated 28-07-2015 passed i (Assessment year 2007-2008) by the Income Tax Appellate Visakhapatnam Bench, Visakhapatnam, filed challenging the Order 30-12-2011 passed in ITA No.338/ITO, W-3(2)/VSP/2010-11/11-12, by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Visakhapatnam, which filed against the Order dated 23-12-2010 PAN/GIR No. AADPL9520H Visakhapatnam by the Income Tax Officer Ward 3(2) Visakhapatnam. 1961 aggrieved in I.T.A No.51A/izag/2012 Tribunal, dated W-3(2). Between: Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Visakhapatnam. ...APPELLANT AND Smt. A. Rajya Lakshmi, D.No. 10-50-22/1, Sripuram Jn., Visakhapatnam-530 003. ...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant : SRI ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI (SC FOR INCOME TAX) Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following ORDER :
APHC010357982017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3516] WEDNESDAY. THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 272/2016 Between: Pr Comm Of Income Tax-1, Vsp ...APPELLANT AND Smt A Rajya Lakshmi Vsp Counsel for the Appellant: 1.ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Respondent: 1.
2 HBKMJ & HVN,J ITTA.No.272 of 2016 The Court made the following: Jl^DGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Krishna Mohan) The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Appeal on monetary limit basis. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, order as to costs. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. SOI- E.KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench Visakhapatnam. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Visakhapatnam. The Income Tax Officer Ward 3(2) Visakhapatnam. One CC to SRI. ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI (Sc for Income Tax) Advocate [OPUC] 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. THREE CD COPIES Chp TAC
HIGH COURT DATED:29/01/2025 JUDGMENT ITTA.No.272 of 2016 DISMISSING THE ITTA AS WITHDRAWN
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026