ANDHRA BANK FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD,. HYDERABAD vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I, HYDERABAD

Bench: C.V. BHASKAR REDDY,UJJAL BHUYAN

260,4 of the Act, lurther interference by the High Court is not n(tcessary. IIc ftnally submits that no question of law arises in this batch of appeals muchless any substantial qui:stion of lau . 12. Submissions made bl learned counsel for the parties have received the due consideration of the Court. 13. Before ad verting

ANDHRA BANK FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I

Bench: C.V. BHASKAR REDDY,UJJAL BHUYAN

260,4 of the Act, lurther interference by the High Court is not n(tcessary. IIc ftnally submits that no question of law arises in this batch of appeals muchless any substantial qui:stion of lau . 12. Submissions made bl learned counsel for the parties have received the due consideration of the Court. 13. Before ad verting

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III, vs. M/S. SAVIJANA SEA FOODS PVT. LTD.,

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO,ALOK ARADHE

HOUSING PVT.LTD ...... Respondent Through: Mr. M.S. Syali, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arta Trana Panda and Ms. Gargi Sethee, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ITA 210/2003 & connected matters Page 5 of 36 J U D G M E N T Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: 1. These are 11 appeals under Section 260-A of the Income

SMT. SHANTHA VIDYASAGAR ANNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2) HYDERABAD

In the result, the orders dated 09

Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO,ALOK ARADHE

260-4 of the lncome Tax Act' 196'1 against the orderdated09-06-2006passedinl.T.A.No.885/Hyd/2003forAssessmentyear 1997-98 on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad 'A'Bench' Hyderabad preferred against the Assessment Order dated 21-02-2002 passed in PAN/GIRNo'ACHPA5446M/S-.1759^/t/d.4(2)onthefileofthelncomeTaxofficer, Ward 4(2), HYderabad. Between: Smt. Shantha Vidyasagar Annam' 3-4-612' Narayarraguda' Hyderabad ...Appellant

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. M/s. Kokivenkateswara Reddy AND others,

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

HOUSING PVT.LTD ...... Respondent Through: Mr. M.S. Syali, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arta Trana Panda and Ms. Gargi Sethee, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ITA 210/2003 & connected matters Page 5 of 36 J U D G M E N T Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: 1. These are 11 appeals under Section 260-A of the Income

COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX VJA vs. U. RAJI REDDY

Bench: V.ESWARAIAH,K.G.SHANKAR

Section 260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act') against the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). Eight of these are appeals by the Assessee and two are by the Revenue. 2. The Assessee's appeals being ITA No. 841/2007 (corresponding to hA No. 1 167/Del/2002 before the ITAT for the AY 1996-97), ITA No. 848/2007

The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Srimantha Granites

Appeals are dismissed

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

HOUSE, JALAHALLI I.T.A Nos.176/2015, 520/2014, 175/2015, 177/2015, 178/2015, 179/2015, 298/2015 7 GOKULA BANGALORE-560 054 PAN: AAATM34931G …RESPONDENT (BY SHRI. A. SHANKAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SHRI. M. LAVA, ADVOCATE) THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED: 21/11/2014 PASSED IN ITA NO.1651/BANG/2012, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009, PRAYING

The Commissioner of Income-tax-I, vs. Derco Cooling Coils Ltd,

Appeals are dismissed

Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM,G.CHANDRAIAH

HOUSE, JALAHALLI I.T.A Nos.176/2015, 520/2014, 175/2015, 177/2015, 178/2015, 179/2015, 298/2015 7 GOKULA BANGALORE-560 054 PAN: AAATM34931G …RESPONDENT (BY SHRI. A. SHANKAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SHRI. M. LAVA, ADVOCATE) THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED: 21/11/2014 PASSED IN ITA NO.1651/BANG/2012, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009, PRAYING

The Commissioner of Income Tax- I vs. Harmahendar Singh Bagga

Appeals are dismissed

Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM,G.CHANDRAIAH

HOUSE, JALAHALLI I.T.A Nos.176/2015, 520/2014, 175/2015, 177/2015, 178/2015, 179/2015, 298/2015 7 GOKULA BANGALORE-560 054 PAN: AAATM34931G …RESPONDENT (BY SHRI. A. SHANKAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SHRI. M. LAVA, ADVOCATE) THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED: 21/11/2014 PASSED IN ITA NO.1651/BANG/2012, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009, PRAYING

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI PINNAMANENI PARANDHAMAIAH

In the result, the appeal is allowed

Bench: C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,T.AMARNATH GOUD

260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 13.04.2017 PASSED IN ITA NO.304/BANG/2017 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13, PRAYING TO: (i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE. 2 (ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF THE ITAT PASSED IN ITA NO.304/BANG/2017 RELATING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13. (iii) PASS

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [TDS], HYDERABAD vs. M/S GHMC, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal is disposed of

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI

260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’, for short) has been filed by the assessee. The subject matter of the appeal pertains to the Assessment Year 2010-11. The appeal was admitted by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 15.02.2015 on the following substantial questions of law: "1. Whether

The Commissioner of Income Tax I vs. Mesmer Technologies Ltd

The appeals are allowed in part

Bench: SANJAY KUMAR,M.S.K.JAISWAL

260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 05.08.2016 PASSED IN ITA NO.873/BANG/2015, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-2013 PRAYING TO A) TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT. B) TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO THE EXTENT AGAINST

Commissioner of Income Tax-III, vs. Smt K. V.Lakshmi Savitri Devi,

Bench: GODA RAGHURAM,M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO

Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”) challenging the order dt. 31-03-2011 in I.T.A.No.1504/Hyd/2010 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench-A, Hyderabad relating to the assessment year 2003-04. 2. The respondent is an individual deriving income from salary in house property

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Dr. T.Ravi Kumar

The appeal is disposed of

260-A OF I.T. ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT F ORDER DATED 29.06.2012 PASSED IN ITA NO.146/BANG/2012 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10, PRAYING TO: (I) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN. 2 (I) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.146/BANG/2012 DATED 29/06/2012 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE

Commissioner of Incoem Tax- 2, vs. M/s. Erythor Pharma Pvt. Ltd.,

In the result, the impugned order dated

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

HOUSE CHICKPET, BANGALORE-560053. ... APPELLANT (By Sri. S. PARTHASARATHI, ADV.) AND: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE 5(1), BANGALORE. ... RESPONDENT (By Sri. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.) - - - THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T. ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 20-4-2010 PASSED IN ITA NO.1098/BNG/2009, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07, PRAYING TO FORMULATE

The Director of Income Tax (Exemptions) vs. G Pulla Reddy Chritable Trust

In the result, the orders passed by the Commissioner of

Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM,G.CHANDRAIAH

260-A OF I.T. ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 28.11.2014 PASSED IN ITA 2 NO.269/BANG/2014 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10, PRAYING TO: (I) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE. (II) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.269/BANG/2014 DATED 28.11.2014 UPHOLDING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER

The Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. The Andhra Bank Employees Co.Operative Bank Limited

In the result, for the above reasons, these appeals fail and

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

260 and 261 were also amended to provide an appeal to the High Court directly against orders of the Tribunal. The appellate power, however, was limited to consideration of a substantial question of law. Section 260A(2)(c) of the Act mandates that proceedings under Section 260A(1) of the Act shall be in the form of memorandum of appeal

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II, HYDERABAD vs. M/s. The A.P.Vardhaman(Mahila)Cooperative Urban

In the result, for the above reasons, these appeals fail and

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

260 and 261 were also amended to provide an appeal to the High Court directly against orders of the Tribunal. The appellate power, however, was limited to consideration of a substantial question of law. Section 260A(2)(c) of the Act mandates that proceedings under Section 260A(1) of the Act shall be in the form of memorandum of appeal