Landmark Cases on Business Income and Deductions

1,377 decisions, ranked by how many judgments on BharatTax rely on them.

Bongaigaon Refinery and Petrochemicals Ltd. v. CIT
251 ITR 329 · 2001 · Supreme Court
53
citing judgments

Income earned during the construction phase of a project, which has a direct and inextricable nexus with the project's setting up, constitutes a capital receipt and reduces the project's cost, rather than being taxable as revenue income. This applies to incidental income like interest on funds (e.g., share capital, grants) temporarily parked before being utilized for the specific project.

CIT v. Emirates Commercial Bank Ltd.
262 ITR 55 · 2003 · High Court
53
citing judgments

Section 44C of the Income Tax Act does not apply to expenses exclusively incurred by a foreign bank's branch office in India. The provision applies only to common head office expenses that require allocation across various entities.

CIT v. Mahalakshmi Rice Factory
294 ITR 631 · 2007 · High Court
53
citing judgments

The requirement of filing an audit report along with the return of income for claiming deductions under sections like 80-IA(7) or 80J(6A) is directory, not mandatory. The deduction can be allowed if the audit report is filed any time before the assessment is framed or processed under section 143(1).

Balaji Textiles Industries Pvt Ltd. v. ITO
49 ITD 177 · 1994 · ITAT
53
citing judgments

When an assessee demonstrates corresponding sales, it establishes that goods must have been purchased, and therefore, a complete disallowance of purchases solely based on doubts about supplier genuineness is generally not warranted.

CIT v. Vikram Cotton Mills Ltd.
169 ITR 597 · 1988 · Supreme Court
53
citing judgments

Income generated from activities that are incidental to or intrinsically linked with the preservation, modernization, or expansion of a business, such as temporary letting out of business space or interest from funds retained for business improvement, constitutes business income and not income from other sources.

Pr. CIT v. India Gelatine & Chemicals Ltd.
376 ITR 553 · 2015 · High Court
53
citing judgments

When an assessee has sufficient interest-free funds available to make investments that yield exempt income, no disallowance under Section 14A is justified, particularly concerning interest expenditure.

CIT v. Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd.
364 ITR 88 · 2014 · High Court
53
citing judgments

A subsidy's character as a capital or revenue receipt depends on its purpose; subsidies received for setting up a new unit or expanding an existing one qualify as capital receipts and are not taxable.

Shahzada Nand & Sons. v. CIT
108 ITR 358 · 1977 · Supreme Court
52
citing judgments

The tax department cannot sit in the armchair of a businessman to question the commercial expediency of business decisions, including how contracts are entered into. The revenue cannot substitute its own judgment for the assessee's commercial wisdom when an expenditure is incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes.

B.T. Patel & Sons Belgaum Constructions (P) Ltd. v. CIT
34 Taxmann.com 97 · 2013 · ITAT
52
citing judgments

To claim deduction under Section 80IA for developing an infrastructure facility, an assessee must act as a developer, undertaking the full scope of work, risk, and responsibilities for the entire facility, and not merely as a contractor for a part thereof.

CIT v. Graphite India Ltd.
221 ITR 420 · 1996 · High Court
52
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred for the expansion of an existing business is revenue in nature and allowable as a deduction if it does not create a new asset. Accounting entries in books of accounts do not solely determine the allowability of an expenditure for income tax purposes.

CIT v. Goyal MG Gases P. Ltd.
303 ITR 159 · 2008 · High Court
52
citing judgments

Interest income does not truly accrue, and thus is not taxable, when the realization of the principal amount itself is in jeopardy, upholding the principle that only real income, not hypothetical income, can be subjected to tax.

CIT v. Priya Village Roadshows Ltd.
332 ITR 594 · 2011 · High Court
52
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred for starting a new business is capital in nature, irrespective of whether the project materializes. The essential purpose for which an expenditure is incurred determines its character as capital or revenue under Section 37(1).

CIT v. Bank of Baroda
262 ITR 334 · 2003 · High Court
51
citing judgments

An assessee is entitled to claim a deduction for the depreciation in the value of investments, such as shares and securities, if these investments are valued at cost or market value, whichever is lower, consistent with the real income principle.

India Ltd. v. CIT (Supra). He
303 ITR 411 · 2008 · High Court
51
citing judgments

Interest received by an industrial undertaking for belated receipt of sale consideration for its products constitutes business income directly derived from the business and is not taxable as 'income from other sources'. This characterization makes such income eligible for business-related deductions.

Abdul Kayoom (K.T.M.T.M.) v. Commissioner of Income Tax
44 ITR 689 · 1962 · Supreme Court
51
citing judgments

To determine if an expenditure is capital or revenue, one must consider the nature of the business, the expenditure, the right acquired, and their inter-relation. The concept of 'enduring benefit' is descriptive and relative, not synonymous with perpetual.

CIT v. Tejaji Farasram Kharawalla Ltd.
67 ITR 95 · 1968 · Supreme Court
51
citing judgments

Reimbursement of expenses does not constitute income and is therefore not taxable as a revenue receipt. Such receipts are treated as a reduction of cost rather than income.

CIT v. Vinitec Corporation (P) Ltd.
278 ITR 337 · 2005 · High Court
51
citing judgments

A provision for warranty liability, even if quantified on an estimated basis, is considered a definite and certain business liability, qualifying for deduction under Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, and is not a contingent liability.

CIT v. Bombay Samachar Ltd.
74 ITR 723 · 1969 · High Court
51
citing judgments

When an assessee has mixed funds from both own sources and borrowings in a cash credit account, the debit balance is presumed to have been met from the company's own funds. This principle is applied to assess the allowability of interest deduction under Section 36(1)(iii) for capital borrowed for business purposes.

CIT v. Bank of Rajasthan Ltd.
316 ITR 391 · 2009 · High Court
51
citing judgments

Broken period interest paid on the purchase of securities constitutes capital expenditure and is therefore not allowable as a revenue deduction.

CIT v. Sham Lal Bansal
200 Taxmann 14 · 2011 · High Court
51
citing judgments

Subsidy received under the TUF Scheme is capital in nature and not chargeable to tax. The purpose of the subsidy determines whether it is on revenue or capital account.

Bombay Oil Industries Ltd. v. DCIT
28 SOT 383 · 2009 · ITAT
50
citing judgments

Loans or advances made by a company in the normal course of business, out of business expediency, or as current account transactions, do not attract the provisions of section 2(22)(e) concerning deemed dividends.

CIT v. United Glass Mfg. Co. Ltd.
28 Taxmann.com 429 · 2012 · Supreme Court
50
citing judgments

Club membership fees paid by a company for its employees are considered pure business expenses, allowable under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act.

CIT v. Manjara Shetkari SSK Ltd.
301 ITR 191 · 2008 · High Court
50
citing judgments

A cooperative society's payments of differential or excess price for produce to its members are not subject to disallowance under Section 40A(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act. Such payments cannot be disallowed as mere appropriation of profits without examining the specific facts and any authorising resolutions.

CIT v. Lord Krishna Bank Ltd.
339 ITR 606 · 2011 · High Court
50
citing judgments

For the purpose of identifying a bank's rural branch under Explanation (ia) to Section 36(1)(viia) of the Income-tax Act, the 'place' refers to a revenue village, not a ward of a local authority like a Panchayat or Municipality. A rural branch is located in a village where the population is less than 10,000.

CIT Assam v. The Panbari
57 ITR 422 · 1965 · Supreme Court
50
citing judgments

The substance of a transaction, not merely its form, determines whether a payment is a capital receipt (like a premium or salami for transferring a right to enjoy property) or revenue income (like periodical rent), even if the capital payment is made in instalments.

Gestetner Duplicators P. Ltd. v. CIT
117 ITR 1 · 1979 · Supreme Court
50
citing judgments

An employer's contribution to a recognized provident fund qualifies as a business expenditure for income tax purposes.

CIT v. ITC Hotels Ltd.
290 ITR 217 · 2007 · High Court
50
citing judgments

Expenditure, including interest paid on Compulsorily Convertible Debentures (CCDs) or Optionally Convertible Debentures (OCDs), qualifies as an allowable revenue deduction for income tax purposes.

CIT v. Insilco Ltd.
320 ITR 322 · 2009 · High Court
50
citing judgments

Discounts allowed to customers constitute a lesser realization of the sale price and are not to be treated as an expenditure.

CIT v. Friends & Friends Shipping (P.) Ltd.
217 Taxmann 267 · 2013 · High Court
50
citing judgments
Chambal Fertilisers & Chemicals Ltd. v. JCIT
107 Taxmann.com 484 · 2019 · High Court
49
citing judgments

Education cess paid by an assessee is not allowable as a deduction under Section 37 read with Section 40(a)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, as it is considered a 'tax'. This position was affirmed by the Supreme Court in a later decision.

CIT v. Motilal Hirabhai Spg. And Wvg. Co. Ltd.
113 ITR 173 · 1978 · High Court
49
citing judgments

The determination of whether share transactions constitute a business activity or an investment depends on the facts of the case. Factors like volume, frequency, and regularity indicate business activity, irrespective of how such transactions are presented in accounts.

277(D- E) and CIT v. U.P. State Industrial Development Corporation
225 ITR 703 · 1997 · Supreme Court
49
citing judgments

A liability, including an obligation to pay compensatory interest arising from a contract, is deductible as a business expense under Section 37(1) when it has crystallized and become an ascertained liability.

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Gujarat Alkalies Chemicals Limited
395 ITR 247 · 2017 · High Court
49
citing judgments

Deduction under Section 80IA is allowable for captive power generation. The price for calculating this deduction is the rate at which the electricity board supplies power to its consumers, rather than the rate at which power generating companies supply to the electricity board.

Phaltan Sugar Works Ltd. v. CIT
215 ITR 582 · 1995 · High Court
49
citing judgments

Interest on borrowed capital used for purposes not directly related to the assessee's immediate business, such as providing interest-free advances or investing in a subsidiary's shares, is not deductible under Section 36(1)(iii) due to a restrictive interpretation of "for the purposes of business."

CIT v. Madras Motors Ltd.
257 ITR 60 · 2002 · High Court
49
citing judgments

Interest received on delayed payments from trade debtors for sale consideration is considered income derived from the business of an industrial undertaking. This income is eligible for deduction under relevant provisions like Section 80IB or 80IE.

(1) DCIT v. Core Healthcare Ltd.
251 ITR 61 · 2001 · High Court
49
citing judgments

Interest paid on money borrowed for acquiring machinery is deductible under Section 36(1)(iii) even if the machinery is not put to use in the year of borrowing. This principle applies to the 'for the purpose of business' test for borrowed capital.

Ltd. v. ACIT
21 Taxmann.com 138 · 2012 · Reported
49
citing judgments

Merely being designated a 'contractor' in an agreement does not automatically disqualify an assessee from claiming deductions for infrastructure development under Chapter VI-A, such as section 80-IA, if the substance of the activity qualifies.

Ramchandar Shivnarayan v. CIT
111 ITR 263 · 1978 · Supreme Court
48
citing judgments

A business loss is deductible if it has a direct and proximate nexus with business operations or is incidental to them, applying a commercial standard, even without an explicit statutory provision for its deduction.

Saraya Sugar Mills (P.) Ltd. v. CIT
116 ITR 387 · 1979 · High Court
48
citing judgments

Interest on arrears of sales tax is penal in nature, not compensatory, thereby affecting its deductibility as a business expenditure under the Income Tax Act.

Loyal Motor Service Co. Ltd. v. CIT
14 ITR 647 · 1946 · High Court
48
citing judgments

A payment of bonus or commission is allowable as a business deduction under Section 36(1)(ii) unless it constitutes a distribution of profits or dividends, thereby distinguishing payments genuinely for services from those merely intended to escape taxation.

100 TT J 224 (IT AT Kolkatta) 4. West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. v. JCIT
16 SOT 509 · 2007 · ITAT
48
citing judgments

The market rate for self-generated electricity, relevant for computing deductions like Section 80IA, is the rate at which the State Electricity Board supplies power to other industrial units in the same area. This rate reflects the price at which power is available to consumers, irrespective of restrictions on the assessee's open market sales.

CIT v. Ponni Sugars & Chemicals Ltd.
260 ITR 605 · 2003 · High Court
48
citing judgments

The purpose and object of a subsidy scheme are of primary importance in determining its nature (capital or revenue), overriding the timing of its receipt or the source of the funds.

CIT v. Sri Mangayarkarasi Mills (P) Ltd.
315 ITR 114 · 2009 · Supreme Court
48
citing judgments

Expenditure qualifies as 'current repairs' if it maintains existing machinery without replacement, creates no new asset, restores functional efficiency without increasing capacity, and is not an independent unit. Conversely, the cost of replacing machinery, especially independent units, constitutes capital expenditure.

J.K. Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT
62 ITR 34 · 1966 · High Court
48
citing judgments

A debtor cannot unilaterally bring about a cessation or remission of liability for tax purposes; such an event requires a bilateral act, the creditor's acceptance of refusal, or other specific conditions like the debt becoming legally unenforceable coupled with the debtor's stated intention not to honour it.

Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras v. Ponni Sugars and Chemicals Ltd.
9 SCC 337 · 2008 · Reported
48
citing judgments

The classification of a government subsidy as either a revenue or capital receipt depends on its object and purpose. If the subsidy is given to enable the assessee to set up a new unit or expand an existing one, it is a capital receipt; if it is to meet recurring expenses, it is a revenue receipt.

CIT v. Shreyas S. Morakhia
342 ITR 285 · 2012 · High Court
48
citing judgments

For a share broker, the unrealised value of shares from clients or other trade balances written off is deductible as a bad debt under section 36(1)(vii) if the corresponding income was previously recognized. This principle applies to bad debts arising from revenue transactions, not capital loans.

CIT v. Gloster Jute Mills Ltd.
96 Taxmann.com 303 · 2018 · High Court
48
citing judgments
CIT v. Saurashtra Cement and Chemical Industries Ltd.
91 ITR 170 · 1973 · High Court
48
citing judgments

Business is considered set up when initial and essential activities for its establishment, such as obtaining necessary licenses, leases, and beginning raw material extraction, commence, even before the main manufacturing plant is fully installed or production has started.

South Indian Bank Ltd. v. CIT
262 ITR 579 · 2003 · High Court
48
citing judgments

For banks, bad debts written off from non-rural advances are not subject to the limitations of the provisos to sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viii), as these provisos apply only to rural advances; section 36(1)(viia) also applies exclusively to rural advances. Additionally, depreciation on investments valued at market price on the balance sheet date is eligible for deduction.

CIT v. Textool Co. Ltd.
135 ITR 200 · 1982 · High Court
48
citing judgments

A loss is deductible as a business loss only if it arises during the course of or is incidental to business operations, requiring a direct and proximate nexus with the business. If profits from an activity are taxable, losses from it are deductible.