100 TT J 224 (IT AT Kolkatta) 4. West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. v. JCIT

16 SOT 509Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2007#2410 most cited

What is 100 TT J 224 (IT AT Kolkatta) 4. West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. v. JCIT authority for?

The market rate for self-generated electricity, relevant for computing deductions like Section 80IA, is the rate at which the State Electricity Board supplies power to other industrial units in the same area. This rate reflects the price at which power is available to consumers, irrespective of restrictions on the assessee's open market sales.

48

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Jindal Steel & Power Limited · West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. v. JCIT · 16 SOT 509 · 100 TT J 224 · Section 80IA · Section 80IA(8) · market rate electricity · self-generated power deduction · arm's length price power · Electricity Board rates · Section 40A(2)(b) · Electricity Act 2003

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing 100 TT J 224 (IT AT Kolkatta) 4. West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. v. JCIT

ASSTT. COMM. OF INCOME TAX 6(1)(1) , MUMBAI vs. M/S CENTURY TEXTILES & INDUSTRIES LTD , MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2647/MUM/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Mar 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Baskaran Br & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleacit, 6(1)(1) Vs. M/S Century Textiles Room No. 502, 5Th & Industrials Ltd Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, 2Nd Floor, Century Mk Road, Bhavan, Dr. Annie Mumbai-400020. Beasant Road, Worli, Mumbai – 400030. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaacc2659Q Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Mr.Jogendra Singh.Dr Respondent By : Mr. Chaitanya D. Joshi.Ar Date Of Hearing 31.01.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 24.02.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Revenue Has Filed The Appeal Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi / Cit(A), Passed U/S 250 Of The Act.

For Appellant: Mr.Jogendra Singh.DRFor Respondent: Mr. Chaitanya D. Joshi.AR
Section 10(34)Section 10(35)Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 250Section 80I

…rily fetch in the open market. It will be observed from the foregoing explanation that the market value means the price that such goods or services would ordinarily fetch in the open market. It has been held in the case of ACIT v. Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. (16 SOT 509) by the Hon'ble Delhi Tribunal that the price at which the State purchases the electricity is subject to many statutory restrictions and, therefore, cannot be held as market value. The tribunal has held that the price at which the assessee purchases its power from the State Electricity Board shall be considered as "market value" for the purposes o…

ASSTT COMM OF INCOME TAX 6(1) (1) , MUMBAI vs. CENTURY TEXTILES & INDUSTRIES LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 1886/MUM/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Nov 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey, Jm & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Am आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1886 /Mum/2022 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax बिधम/ Century Textiles & Industries Ltd 6(1)(1) Vs. 2Nd Floor, Century Bhavan, Room No. 504, Aaykar Bhavan, Dr Annie Besant Road, M.K.Road, Churchgate, Worli, Mumbai- 400030 Mumbai- 400020 स्थधयीलेखधसं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaacc2659Q (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri. Yogesh Thar Revenue By: Shri. Asif Karmani, Sr Ar सुनवाईकीतारीख / Date Of Hearing: 26/10/2022 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 29/11/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Aby T. Varkey, Jm:

For Appellant: Shri. Yogesh TharFor Respondent: Shri. Asif Karmani, Sr AR
Section 263Section 80Section 801ASection 80I

…electricity to similar types of consumers at the market value. The assessee also relied upon the cases i.e. Principle CIT Vs. Gujarat Alkalies & Chemicals Ltd. (395 ITR 247). West Coast Paper Mills Vs. Jt. CIT(100 TTJ 833). ACIT Vs. Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. (16 SOT 509) & CIT Vs. Godawari Power & Ispat Ltd., 42 Taxmann.com 551. However, on the other hand, the Ld. Representative of the Department has refuted the said contentions. Taking into account, facts and circumstances of the case, we noticed that the issue in question has duly been covered by the assessee's own case for the A.Y. 2006-07 decided by Hon'ble I…

Showing 120 of 48 · Page 1 of 3