Landmark Cases on Business Income and Deductions

2,356 decisions, ranked by how many judgments on BharatTax rely on them.

Kamal Textiles v. ITO
59 Taxmann 555 · 1991 · High Court
18
citing judgments

The issue of whether the employer's contribution to employee welfare funds can be claimed as a deduction is a recurring point of contention, with various benches referencing Kamal Textiles v. ITO in the context of amendments to Section 43B and Section 36(1)(va) by the Finance Act, 2021.

Goodearth Ltd. v. CIT
60 Taxmann.com 268 · 2015 · High Court
18
citing judgments

Interest paid on borrowings for the purpose of investment by an assessee can be treated as business expenditure.

Binodiram Balchand v. Commissioner of Income Tax (48 1TR 548)
65 ITR 1 · 1967 · High Court
18
citing judgments

The reasonableness of a business expenditure must be judged from the perspective of a businessman, not the tax department, and actual incurring of expenditure cannot be disallowed merely on suspicion without contrary evidence.

CIT v. Indian Mica Supply Co. (P.) Ltd.
77 ITR 20 · 1970 · Supreme Court
18
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred by an assessee, even if relating to past liabilities, is deductible in the year it is ascertained and paid, provided it was incurred in the interest of and for the business.

84 Taxmann.com 186 Ltd. 4. PCIT v. Empire Package Pvt. Ltd. Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court
81 Taxmann.com 108 · 2017 · High Court
18
citing judgments

The Assessing Officer's disallowance can be restricted to the actual amount of exempted income when investments are brought forward from earlier years. No fresh investment during the year is a relevant consideration.

CIT v. Jagdish H Patel
84 Taxmann.com 259 · 2017 · High Court
18
citing judgments

When purchases are suspected to be bogus, only the profit element embedded in such purchases can be added to the income, not the entire purchase price, especially if adding the full amount results in an improbable gross profit margin.

Trib.) (iii) DCIT v. M/s. STP Ltd.
85 Taxmann.com 80 · 2017 · High Court
18
citing judgments

The Department of Scientific and Industrial Research's (DSIR) role, prior to July 1, 2016, was limited to approving R&D facilities, not the expenditure incurred, even if specific forms were not issued.

Deutsche Bank A.G v. DCIT
86 ITD 431 · 2003 · ITAT
18
citing judgments

Anticipated or contingent profits from foreign exchange forward contracts, to the extent not settled at the close of the accounting year, cannot be brought to tax if not accounted for in the financial statements. However, any losses on such contracts should be provided for by a charge in the profit and loss account on the best estimate basis.

Conventional Fastners v. CIT, Dehradun
88 Taxmann.com 163 · 2017 · High Court
18
citing judgments

Interest earned on Fixed Deposits (FDRs) kept as security for a Performance Bank Guarantee is considered business income but is not eligible for deduction under Section 80IC or Section 801A of the Income Tax Act.

Shri Rama Multi Tech v. ACIT
92 TTJ 568 · ITAT
18
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred for obtaining a loan, including stamp duty and lawyer fees, is revenue expenditure if it facilitates the business of the company, regardless of the loan's purpose. Consultancy charges paid on grounds of commercial expediency are also revenue expenditure.

Munjal Showa Ltd. v. DCIT
94 TTJ 227 · 2005 · ITAT
18
citing judgments

Foreign currency, and therefore derivative/forward contracts in respect of foreign currency, cannot be considered a commodity for the purpose of speculative transaction provisions. Such contracts entered into for hedging foreign exchange fluctuations are not speculative.

CIT v. Pt. Vishwanath Sharma
316 ITR 419 · 2009 · High Court
18
citing judgments

Payments made as commission to government doctors for prescribing medicines are considered illegal gratification or bribes and are therefore not allowable as business expenditure under Section 37(1).

CIT v. P. Sudhakar
61 Taxmann.com 17 · 2015 · High Court
18
citing judgments

Net profit rate of 5% to 7% is considered fair and reasonable for sub-contractors in civil works. The High Court has also quashed revision proceedings where the AO estimated income from sub-contract works.

Aman Marble Industries (P.) Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise
1 SCC 279 · 2005 · Supreme Court
18
citing judgments

The case clarified that activities like cutting marble blocks into slabs can constitute 'manufacture' for excise purposes, a principle relevant to understanding 'production' under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act, even if the earlier judgment did not explicitly interpret 'production'.

Amarjothi Pictures v. CIT
69 ITR 755 · 1968 · High Court
18
citing judgments

The revenue cannot question the commercial expediency of an expenditure if it is incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business. The assessee's judgment on what constitutes reasonable business expenditure is generally respected.

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Denso India Limited
318 ITR 140 · 2009 · High Court
18
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred for developing import substitute parts, even if treated as deferred revenue expenditure, is allowable as revenue expenditure if it's not of a capital nature and doesn't grant exclusive or enduring rights.

Manjusha Estates (P) Ltd. v. ITO
393 ITR 644 · 2017 · High Court
18
citing judgments

The Tribunal is wrong in rejecting the Project Completion Method followed consistently by the assessee and applying the work-in-progress method, taxing 80% as net profit.

CIT v. McDowell & Co. Ltd.
180 Taxmann 514 · 2009 · Supreme Court
18
citing judgments

The specific words 'know-how, patents, copyrights, trade marks, licenses and franchises' constitute a distinct class of positive rights that are capable of being used or put to use, and the expression 'any other business or commercial rights of similar nature' is to be read along with the preceding categories, not as a separate category.

CIT v. Oriental Fire & General Insurance Co Ltd.
291 ITR 370 · 2007 · Supreme Court
18
citing judgments

For non-life insurers, the computation of income must strictly follow Section 44 and the First Schedule of the Income Tax Act. Expenses incurred in contravention of law or a regulatory cap are not deductible.

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. Facor Power Ltd.
380 ITR 474 · 2016 · High Court
18
citing judgments

Interest income earned on funds deposited with banks, which were borrowed for the construction of a power project, is inextricably linked to the business of the assessee and should not be treated as income from other sources. Such net interest income shall be capitalized.

Changepond Technologies (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT
119 TTJ 18 · 2008 · ITAT
18
citing judgments

Expenses disallowed and added back to total income are eligible for deduction under Section 10B.

CIT v. B.N.Exports
323 ITR 178 · 2010 · High Court
18
citing judgments

Premium paid for a keyman insurance policy is allowable as a business expenditure. The fact that the maturity value of the policy is claimed as exempt by individuals does not affect the allowability of the expenditure for the company.

CIT v. State Trading Corporation of India Ltd.
328 ITR 257 · 2010 · High Court
18
citing judgments

When an Assessing Officer rejects books of account under Section 145(3), the AO's estimation of income is valid and the Assessing Officer is the best judge to estimate income.

Pr. CIT v. Novell Software Development India (P.) Ltd.
434 ITR 154 · 2021 · High Court
18
citing judgments

A disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act cannot be made in the absence of exempt income.

CIT v. Modi Rubber Ltd.
378 ITR 128 · 2015 · High Court
18
citing judgments

Interest-free advances are presumed to be given out of owned funds, not borrowed funds, if the assessee has sufficient owned funds. The revenue cannot arbitrarily estimate proportionate interest expenditure when the assessee has the right to appropriate funds.

Raja Bejoy Singh Budhuria v. CIT
1 ITR 135 · 1933 · Supreme Court
17
citing judgments

Income is diverted by overriding title before it reaches the assessee if the nature of the obligation means the amount cannot be considered part of the assessee's income.

Sony India (1) Laf v. Dy. CIT
103 ITD 73 · 2006 · ITAT
17
citing judgments

An Assessing Officer's disallowance of advertising, marketing, and promotion (AMP) expenses is invalid if those expenses were incurred wholly and exclusively for the assessee's business and to promote its brand.

(i) DCIT v. Core Healthcare Ltd.
110 TTJ 170 · 2007 · ITAT
17
citing judgments

The principal amount written off is allowable as a deduction under Section 36(1)(vii) read with Section 36(2) of the Income Tax Act, even if the company is not engaged in the money lending business.

NALCO v. DCIT
110 TTJ 948 · ITAT
17
citing judgments

Expenditure in lieu of compensation for employment is treated as compensation in lieu of employment.

Provimi Animal Nutrition India Private Limited v. PCIT
124 Taxmann.com 73 · 2021 · ITAT
17
citing judgments

The prescribed authority's failure to send intimation in Form 3CL does not disentitle an assessee from claiming deduction under section 35(2AB) of the Act. Amendments to Rule 6(7A) apply prospectively from July 1, 2016, meaning prior to this date, Form 3CL approval was not essential for the quantification of weighted deduction under section 35(2AB).

MTA Coal Mines Ltd., Bangalore Page 49 of 55 (b) Prakash Cotton Mills Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT
129 TTJ 81 · 2010 · ITAT
17
citing judgments

Interest paid on delayed payment of service tax or sales tax is compensatory in nature and therefore, it is an allowable business expense. The same principle applies to interest levied for delayed payment of TDS.

CIT v. Sugauli Sugar Works (P) Ltd.
140 ITR 286 · 1983 · High Court
17
citing judgments

A liability does not cease and become taxable under section 41(1) merely because the debt has become time-barred. The creditor's right to recover the debt does not extinguish solely due to the passage of time.

Similarly, in CIT v. Indian Overseas Bank
151 ITR 446 · 1985 · High Court
17
citing judgments

A loss must be allowed if it has actually arisen and is not merely anticipated, even if it is not immediately profitable.

ACIT v. M.Baskaran
152 ITD 844 · 2015 · ITAT
17
citing judgments

Income from investments must be considered for disallowance under Section 14A, but only if actual income has been earned. The assessment must involve an exercise to determine if income has been earned, if the investee company can declare dividends, and if dividends will be declared in the future.

ITO 103 Taxmann.com 342(Mad), Jhunjhunwala & Co Vs CIT 167 Taxman 58(Delhi), CIT v. Singamshetty Subba Rao
159 ITD 406 · ITAT
17
citing judgments

Payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 that violate Section 40A(3) are not covered by the exception in Rule 6DD(j) if the genuineness of such expenses is doubtful, especially when they are unrecorded in the books.

Siddhivinayak Kohinoor Venture v. ACIT
159 TTJ 390 · 2014 · ITAT
17
citing judgments

An undertaking developing and building housing projects is eligible for deduction under section 80IB(10) if the housing project receives approval, and a separate approval for each distinct housing project within a larger development is not necessarily required.

1948 by the Privy Council in CIT v. Raja Bahadur Kamakhaya Narayan Singh
16 ITR 325 · 1948 · Reported
17
citing judgments

The word 'derived' in a tax context requires an inquiry into the immediate and effective source of income, not its ultimate origin.

Principal Commissioner of Income-tax (Central) v. Dwarka Prasad Aggarwal
161 Taxmann.com 813 · 2024 · Supreme Court
17
citing judgments

Commercial transactions, such as intercorporate deposits that charge interest, are outside the ambit of Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act.

CIT v. Jyoti
166 Taxmann 343 · 2008 · High Court
17
citing judgments

Interest income earned as margin money for export sales is business profit, and subsequent favourable decisions override earlier opposing ones.

312 ITR 254 (SC) and CIT v. Realest Builders & Services Ltd.
170 Taxmann 218 · 2008 · Supreme Court
17
citing judgments

When royalty expenses have been crystallized in an assessment year and their genuineness is not questioned by revenue authorities, disallowance of such expenses by the Assessing Officer is incorrect.

PCIT v. Paschim GujaratVij Company Ltd.
174 Taxmann.com 748 · 2025 · High Court
17
citing judgments

Interest on staff loans earned by an electricity company is business income, not income from other sources.

I.B.M. World Trade Corporation v. CIT
186 ITR 412 · 1990 · High Court
17
citing judgments

A loss incurred on the write-off of a deposit given for taking premises on lease, where the landlord becomes insolvent and the lease was taken for business purposes, is allowable as a business loss.

CIT v. Multi Metals Ltd.
188 ITR 151 · 1991 · High Court
17
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred in connection with the extension of an undertaking or setting up a new unit by an Indian company is eligible for deduction under section 35D of the Income-tax Act.

(i) CIT v. Mohan Meakin Ltd.
189 Taxmann 377 · 2010 · High Court
17
citing judgments

Expenses incurred for pooja are allowable as a business expenditure if treated as a welfare measure for employees. Pooja expenses are deductible from business profits.

CIT v. Maharaja Shree Umaid Mills Ltd.
192 ITR 565 · 1991 · High Court
17
citing judgments

If the assessee's books of account have not been rejected, a mere fall in the gross profit rate does not justify an inference of inflated expenditure. Such an inference is only possible if the books are rejected.

ING Vysya Bank v. CIT
208 Taxmann 511 · 2012 · Reported
17
citing judgments

The fall in the value of investments treated as stock-in-trade is to be allowed as a revenue loss.

Additional CIT v. Tulip Star Hotels Limited
21 Taxmann.com 97 · 2012 · Supreme Court
17
citing judgments

Interest paid on borrowed funds used to acquire equity in a subsidiary is deductible under Section 36(1)(iii) if the holding company has a deep interest in the subsidiary's business and the investment is for commercial expediency. The Supreme Court noted that the S.A. Builders Ltd. case may need reconsideration in this context.

Agrawal Flooring Stone Co. v. CIT
216 ITR 757 · 1995 · High Court
17
citing judgments

An amount paid by an assessee to its employees' approved gratuity fund is not deductible if it is not paid wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the business. A payment made by way of contribution to a gratuity fund, while it may be for the benefit of the employees, must also be demonstrably for the purpose of the business itself to qualify for deduction.

Patni Telecommunication (P) Ltd. v. ITO
22 SOT 26 · 2008 · ITAT
17
citing judgments

Expenses excluded from export turnover must also be excluded from total turnover when computing deductions under Chapter VI-A.

M/s Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilisers Ltd. v. CIT (supra)
234 ITR 412 · 1998 · Supreme Court
17
citing judgments

Interest income earned on surplus funds prior to the commencement of business is taxable under Section 56 of the Income Tax Act, unless specific expenses are incurred to earn that income.