CIT v. Sri Mangayarkarasi Mills (P) Ltd.
What is CIT v. Sri Mangayarkarasi Mills (P) Ltd. authority for?
Expenditure qualifies as 'current repairs' if it maintains existing machinery without replacement, creates no new asset, restores functional efficiency without increasing capacity, and is not an independent unit. Conversely, the cost of replacing machinery, especially independent units, constitutes capital expenditure.
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2011 to 2025.
Also referred to as
CIT v Sri Mangayarkarasi Mills · 315 ITR 114 · Section 30 Income Tax Act · Section 31 Income Tax Act · Section 37(1) Income Tax Act · current repairs vs capital expenditure · replacement of machinery · tests for current repairs · machinery replacement deduction · business expenditure classification
Sections most often in play
Judgments citing CIT v. Sri Mangayarkarasi Mills (P) Ltd.
Showing 1–20 of 48 · Page 1 of 3