CIT v. Sri Mangayarkarasi Mills (P) Ltd.

315 ITR 114Supreme Court of India2009#2420 most cited

What is CIT v. Sri Mangayarkarasi Mills (P) Ltd. authority for?

Expenditure qualifies as 'current repairs' if it maintains existing machinery without replacement, creates no new asset, restores functional efficiency without increasing capacity, and is not an independent unit. Conversely, the cost of replacing machinery, especially independent units, constitutes capital expenditure.

48

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2011 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v Sri Mangayarkarasi Mills · 315 ITR 114 · Section 30 Income Tax Act · Section 31 Income Tax Act · Section 37(1) Income Tax Act · current repairs vs capital expenditure · replacement of machinery · tests for current repairs · machinery replacement deduction · business expenditure classification

Judgments citing CIT v. Sri Mangayarkarasi Mills (P) Ltd.

NAGREEKA EXPORTS LIMITED vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6, KOLKATA & ORS.

The Appeal is dismissed

ITA/373/2009HC Calcutta27 Feb 2024

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani & The Hon’Ble Justice Rajarshi Bharadwaj Date : 27Th February 2024. Appearance: Mr. Ranjeet Kr. Murarka, Advocate Mr. S.D. Verma, Advocate Mr. Ananda Sen, Advocate Mr. Vivek Murarka, Advocate … For The Appellant. Mr. S. Roychowdhury, Advocate Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Advocate … For The Respondents 1. Heard Sri Ranjeet Murarka, Learned Counsel For The Appellant Assessee & Sri S. Roychowdhury, Learned Senior Standing Counsel For The Respondents. 2. This Appeal Was Admitted By This Court By Order Dated 04.02.2010, On The Following Substantial Questions Of Law:- “I. Whether On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case The Order Of The Tribunal Is Erroneous As Being Perverse In Reversing The Order Of

Section 37Section 37(1)

…rred for replacement of ring frames is a revenue expenditure liable for deduction under Section 37 of the Act 1961. He submits that the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Sri Mangayarkarasi Mills (P) Limited [2009] 315 ITR 114 (SC) is not applicable inasmuch as in subsequent judgment in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Hindustan Textiles [2010] 190 Taxman 294 (SC) [paragraph 6], Hon'ble Supreme Court directed the High Court to consider the tests laid down in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Sugavaneeshwara Spinning Mills Ltd. 293 ITR 20 (SC), Commissioner of Income Tax v. Ra…

PAB ORGANICS PVT. LTD.,,VADODARA vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(2),, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2648/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Mar 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Pramod M. Jagtap & T.R. Senthil Kumarassessment Year :2012-13 Pab Organics P.Ltd. Dcit, Cir.2(1)(2) 904-905, Atlantis Heights Vs Vadodra. Dr.Vikram Sarabhai Marg Wadi Wadi Vadodara 390 023. Pan: Aabcp 8169 R अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/(Respondent) Assessee By : Shri D.Ki. Parikh, Ca Revenue By : Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 24/02/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 16 /03/2022 आदेश/O R D E R Per T.R. Senthil Kumar: This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against Order Dated 25.07.2016 Passed By Ld.Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-2, Vadodara [For Short “Ld.Cit(A)] In Appeal No.Cab/2/039/15-16 Relating To The Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. The Assessee Has Raised Mainly Two Issues, Viz. Disallowance Of Maintenance Expenditure To Plant & Machinery & Disallowance Of Foreign Travelling Expenses. These Issues Reflected In The Grounds Of Appeal Are As Follows: 2

For Appellant: Shri D.KI. Parikh, CAFor Respondent: Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)

…are of recurring nature and essentially required for smooth running of business of the assessee i.e, generation of power. The other decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court relied upon by the learned D.R. in the case of CIT V/s. Sri Mangayarkarasi Mills (P) Ltd. 315 ITR 114 also following the decision in the case of CIT V/s. Saravana Spinning Mills (supra), has laid down the same proposition of law. On the other hand, the decisions relied upon by the assessee as noted in the order of the CIT(A) clearly supports the view that the expenditure incurred by the assessee cannot be treated as capital expenditure." 10. The…

Showing 120 of 48 · Page 1 of 3