Bombay Oil Industries Ltd. v. DCIT

28 SOT 383Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2009#2279 most cited

What is Bombay Oil Industries Ltd. v. DCIT authority for?

Loans or advances made by a company in the normal course of business, out of business expediency, or as current account transactions, do not attract the provisions of section 2(22)(e) concerning deemed dividends.

50

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2012 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Bombay Oil Industries Ltd. v. DCIT · 28 SOT 383 · section 2(22)(e) · deemed dividend · loan transactions · normal course of business · business expediency · current account transaction · non-applicability of section 2(22)(e)

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Bombay Oil Industries Ltd. v. DCIT

Shri Balram Krishan, Chandigarh vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Chandigarh

ITA 728/CHANDI/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh03 Mar 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 579/Chd/2023 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2017-18 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.582 To 584/Chd/2023 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : 2014-15 To 2016-17 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 591/Chd/2023 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Maxport India Pvt. Ltd. C/O Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered Accountant, H. No. 3035, Sector 27D, Chandigarh- 160019. स्था.लेखा सं./Pan No: Aaicm9120E अपीलाथ/Appellant बनाम प्रथीय/Respondent Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Centre Circle-1, Chandigarh. & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.482 & 483/Chd/2023 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : 2017-18 & 2018-19 Vaishali Aggarwal C/O Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered Accountant, H No. 3035, Sector 27D, Chandigarh- 160022. स्था.लेखा सं./Pan No: Aaqpa4025M अपीलाथ/Appellant बनाम प्रथीय/Respondent Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Centre Circle-1, Chandigarh. & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 846/Chd/2023

Section 127Section 132Section 153ASection 153DSection 2(22)(e)

…outside the scope of deemed dividends as per the statutory provision. Reliance has been placed on following case laws : i). DCIT vs Futurz Next Services Ltd. (Del Trib) (ITA N o. 3556/Del/2016) dated 04.01.2022 ii). Bombay Oil Industries Ltd. Vs. DCIT (2009) 28 SOT 383 (Bom) iii). “Exotica Housing & Infrastructure Company Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO., 82 ITR 0046, (Delhi ITAT), 31. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee has further contended that the assessee provided personal guarantees to SEPL in order to secure credit facilities from banks which included a fund-based limit of Rs.42.85 crore and a non-fund-based limit of Rs.1…

Bombay Oil Industries Ltd. v. DCIT (28 SOT 383) — Cited in 50 Judgments | BharatTax