M/S MAHESHWARI COAL BENEFICATION& INFRASTRUCTURE P. LTD,BILASPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessments under Section 153C for AY 2009-10 to 2012-13 were barred by limitation. It also deleted additions made under Section 68 for all the impugned assessment years, finding them to be either unsubstantiated or double additions. Issues related to unabated years were left undecided as the primary assessments were quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeals challenged assessments made under Section 153C for AY 2009-10 to 2013-14. The assessments were based on documents seized from third parties during a search conducted on January 22, 2019. The assessee argued that the assessments were time-barred and that no incriminating material was found for unabated years.
What were the issues?
Whether assessments made under Section 153C were barred by limitation due to the time limit prescribed in the first proviso to Section 153C and Explanation 1 to Section 153A. Whether additions made under Section 68 for unexplained cash credits were justified, especially when the amounts were declared under IDS or represented double additions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153C,Section 153A,Section 68,Section 132,Section 133A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(30)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- CIT v. Jet Airways (I) Ltd.694 citing331 ITR 236 · 2011 · HC
- PCIT v. Shiv Kumar Nayyar597 citing166 Taxmann.com 327 · 2024 · HC · Read judgment
- 533 citing
- Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. v. CIT398 citing12 Taxmann.com 74 · 2011 · HC
- CIT v. S. Goyanka Lime & Chemical Ltd.340 citing64 Taxmann.com 313 · 2015 · SC
- 21. In SB Gurbaksh Singh v. Union of India318 citing2 SCC 181 · 2007 · SC
- ACIT v. Sirajuddin& Co.288 citing150 Taxmann.com 146 · 2023 · HC
- PCIT v. Ojjus Medicare (P) Ltd.277 citing161 Taxmann.com 160 · 2024 · HC
- DCIT v. Sunil Kumar Sharma269 citing159 Taxmann.com 179 · 2024 · HC
- CIT v. Jasjit Singh235 citing155 Taxmann.com 155 · 2023 · SC · Read judgment
- PCIT v. Sreelekha Damani208 citing307 CTR 218 · 2019 · HC
- PCIT v. Anuj Bansal181 citing165 Taxmann.com 2 · 2024 · HC
- 176 citing
- Revenue in CIT v. Sunil Kumar Sharma118 citing165 Taxmann.com 846 · 2024 · SC
- Sahara India v. CIT108 citing169 Taxmann 328 · 2008 · SC
- CIT v. Usha Stud Agricultural Farms Ltd.98 citing183 Taxmann.com 277 · 2008 · HC · Read judgment
- Agni Vishnu Ventures (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT85 citing157 Taxmann.com 242 · 2023 · HC
- Pr.CIT v. Pioneer Tour Planner (P.) Ltd.76 citing160 Taxmann.com 652 · 2024 · HC
- Sidharth Gupta 450 ITR 534 v. Decision69 citing213 TTJ 251 · 2021 · ITAT
- Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India62 citing4 SCC 379 · 1980
- SMW Ispat (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT28 citing163 Taxmann.com 119 · 2024
- CIT v. Goldstone Cements Ltd.22 citing156 Taxmann.com 529 · 2023 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Jasjit Singh13 citing159 Taxmann.com 1632 · 2023 · HC · Read judgment
- Pr. CIT v. G. Lakshmi Aruna12 citing159 Taxmann.com 183 · 2024 · SC
- Ravindra Arunachala Nadar v. ACIT12 citing129 Taxmann.com 275 · 2021
- CIT v. Fortune Vanijya (P) Ltd.10 citing156 Taxmann.com 191 · 2023 · HC
- PCIT v. Gali Janardhana Reddy10 citing157 Taxmann.com 392 · 2023 · SC
- 332; PCIT v. Smt G Lakshmi Aruna8 citing150 Taxmann.com 107 · 2023 · HC · Read judgment
- Bhagwati Suresh Modi v. ITO7 citing157 Taxmann.com 493 · 2023 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO, & SHRI K.M. ROY, ACCOUNTANT MMBER
PER BENCH
These captioned appeals are filed by the assessee challenging the impugned orders of even date 18/01/2024 passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)–. Nagpur, [“learned CIT(A)”], for the assessment year 2009–10, 2010–11, 2011–12, 2012–13 and 2013–14 respectively.
Since all thes
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026