DCIT v. Sunil Kumar Sharma
159 Taxmann.com 179High Court2024#294 most cited
What is DCIT v. Sunil Kumar Sharma authority for?
Loose sheets of paper containing jottings, not shown to be part of regularly maintained books of accounts, do not constitute incriminating material for initiating assessment under section 153C. The satisfaction note required for 153C proceedings must specify the assessment year to which the alleged incriminating material belongs.
269
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2024 to 2026.
Also referred to as
DCIT v. Sunil Kumar Sharma · section 153C · incriminating material · loose jottings · books of account · satisfaction note · assessment year specific · search and seizure assessment · section 132 · Karnataka High Court · Supreme Court approval
Also reported as
469 ITR 197
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing DCIT v. Sunil Kumar Sharma
Showing 1–20 of 269 · Page 1 of 14
...