CIT v. Goldstone Cements Ltd.
156 Taxmann.com 529High Court2023#5281 most cited
What is CIT v. Goldstone Cements Ltd. authority for?
A document seized during a search is considered incriminating material only after its contents have been evaluated to assess its evidentiary worth. The Assessing Officer must have objective satisfaction from the seized material regarding undisclosed assets exceeding Rs. 50 lakhs before issuing a notice under the fourth proviso to Section 153A.
22
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2024 to 2025.
Also referred to as
CIT v. Goldstone Cements Ltd. · section 132(4a)(i) · section 292c(1)(i) · section 292c(1) · incriminating material · evidentiary worth · section 153A · fourth proviso to Section 153A · objective satisfaction · seized material
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing CIT v. Goldstone Cements Ltd.
Showing 1–20 of 22 · Page 1 of 2