N C SHAW AND CO BEVERAGES PRIVATE LIMITED ,KOLKATA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS CIRCLE 2(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the trade discounts were not in the nature of commission or brokerage as there was no principal-agent relationship. Therefore, Section 194H was not applicable, and the assessee could not be treated as an assessee in default.
What were the facts?
The assessee, N C Shaw and Co Beverages Private Limited, was held as an 'assessee in default' for not deducting TDS on trade discounts given to distributors. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) considered these discounts as commission liable for TDS under Section 194H.
What were the issues?
Whether post-sale trade discounts given to distributors constitute 'commission' or 'brokerage' requiring TDS under Section 194H, and consequently, whether penalty under Section 271C is leviable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 194H,Section 201,Section 201(1A),Section 271C,Section 273B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(13)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT576 citing163 Taxmann 355 · 2007 · SC
- Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. DCIT139 citing372 ITR 33 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- State Lotteries & Ors. (2001) 249 ITR 186 and Ahmedabad Stamp Vendors Association v. Union of India121 citing257 ITR 202 · 2002 · HC
- Bharti Cellular Ltd. v. ACIT46 citing160 Taxmann.com 12 · 2024 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Intervet India (P.) Ltd.45 citing49 Taxmann.com 14 · 2014 · HC
- CIT v. United Breweries Ltd.27 citing387 ITR 150 · 2016 · HC
- Bhopal Sugar Industries v. STO17 citing117 TTJ 346 · 2008 · ITAT
- Additional Commissioner of Income-tax v. Pearl Bottling (P.) Ltd.6 citing10 Taxmann.com 47 · 2011 · ITAT
- Mother Dairy India Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer6 citing28 SOT 42 · 2009 · ITAT
- Commissioner of Income-tax v. Rishikesh Apartments Co-op. Housing Society Ltd.5 citing119 Taxmann 239 · 2001 · HC
- Fosters India Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO3 citing20 SOT 120 · 2008 · ITAT
- Government Milk Scheme v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax3 citing98 ITD 306 · 2006 · ITAT
- Prasar Bharti Broadcasting Corporation of India Akashvani Bhawan, Sansad Marg, New Delhi v. Income-tax3 citing8 SOT 513 · 2006 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘A’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY & SRI RAKESH MISHRA
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण कोलकाता 'ए' पीठ, कोलकाता में IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA ‘A’ BENCH, KOLKATA श्री प्रदीप कुमार चौबे, न्याधयक सदस्य एवं श्री राकेश धमश्रा, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष Before SRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SRI RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.: 1925/KOL/2024 Assessment Year: 2015-16 N C Shaw and Co Beverages Income Tax Officer, TDS Private Limited Vs. Circle-2(2), Kolkata (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AABCN8699N I.T.A. No.: 1947/KOL/2024 Assessment Year: 2015-16 N C Shaw and Co Beverages Addl. Commissioner of Private Limited Income Tax (TDS), Range-2, Vs. Kolkata (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AABCN8699N Appearances: Assessee represented by :Khirendra Mohan Gupta, AR & Vaarun Jain, AR. Department represented by : Pradip Kumar Biswas, Add. CIT. Date of concluding the hearing : November 12th, 2024 Date of pronouncing the order : December 27th, 2024 ORDER PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
Similar judgments
Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.
- N C Shaw and Co Beverages Private Limited… vs Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS)…Kolkata27 Dec 2024Allowed
Also relies on Bhopal Sugar Industries v. STO and 4 other authorities
The Tribunal held that the trade discounts were not in the nature of commission or brokerage as there was no principal-agent relationship. Therefore, Section 194H was not applicable, and the assessee could not be treated...
- DCIT, New Delhi vs M/S Nokia India Pvt. Ltd., GurgaonDelhi20 Feb 2020Partly Allowed
Also relies on Bhopal Sugar Industries v. STO and 3 other authorities
The Tribunal allowed one ground of appeal concerning the treatment of mobile handsets issued as business expenditure, finding it to be revenue in nature. Other grounds related to sales tax return discrepancies and Sectio...
- Asus India Pvt Ltd., Mumbai vs The Ld. Addl/Joint/Deputy/ACIT/ ITO, DelhiMumbai16 Aug 2023Partly Allowed
Also relies on CIT v. United Breweries Ltd. and 2 other authorities
The Tribunal set aside the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) related to sales rebates and discounts back to the AO for fresh adjudication, directing specific consideration of the assessee's contentions. The Tribunal a...
- Asus India Pvt Ltd., Mumbai vs Asst CIT Circle- 9 (1)(2), MumbaiMumbai22 Feb 2022Partly Allowed
Also relies on CIT v. United Breweries Ltd. and 2 other authorities
The Tribunal held that the discounts and rebates provided by the assessee were in the nature of sales transactions and not subject to TDS under Section 194C or 194H. It also directed the exclusion of two companies from t...
- Asus India Pvt Ltd., Mumbai vs Asst CIT Circle- 9(1)(2), MumbaiMumbai5 Oct 2020Partly Allowed
Also relies on CIT v. United Breweries Ltd. and 2 other authorities
The Tribunal held that the rebates/discounts given to dealers were not in the nature of commission as there was no principal-agent relationship. The transactions were principal-to-principal sales. Therefore, the disallow...
More judgments on Section 194H
- Mahesh Pulaveni, Adilabad vs ITO, Ward -11(1), HyderabadITA 991/HYD/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- M/S. Shree Laminators Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 1534/KOL/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-2012
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mohit Jain vs. Union Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Gopal Yadav vs. Union BankMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Infinix Inftoech vs. Utkarsh Small Fianance BankMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Chandra Shekhar Dayar vs. Hdfc BankMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026