Section 194H of the Income Tax Act

The decision most relied on for Section 194H is CIT v. Nagri Mills Co. Ltd. (33 ITR 681), cited in 165 of the 194 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 194H

CIT v. Nagri Mills Co. Ltd.
33 ITR 681 · 1958 · High Court
165
citing judgments

This case establishes principles for the timing of income or loss recognition, particularly concerning the classification and treatment of Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) for tax purposes under the mercantile system of accounting.

Rotork Controls India (P.) Ltd. v. CIT
180 Taxmann 422 · 2009 · Supreme Court
158
citing judgments

A provision for warranty expenses or other contingent liabilities is deductible if it represents a present liability arising from past events, provided its estimation is based on a scientific and systematic methodology, even if the exact quantum of future outflow is uncertain.

CIT v. Idea Cellular Ltd.
325 ITR 148 · 2010 · High Court
155
citing judgments

Discounts offered to distributors under a tightly controlled relationship constitute commission and are subject to tax deduction at source under Section 194H of the Income-tax Act.

CIT v. Bharti Cellular Ltd.
330 ITR 239 · 2011 · Supreme Court
147
citing judgments

The Supreme Court holds that for a service to qualify as 'fees for technical services' under Section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act or Article 12 of a DTAA, direct human involvement or intervention in rendering the service is essential. This principle applies to telecommunication services like interconnect charges and roaming charges, and also to services related to software use.

Merilyn Shipping & Transports v. Addl. CIT
136 ITD 23 · 2012 · ITAT
139
citing judgments

Section 40(a)(ia) disallowance applies only to expenses that remain payable at the end of the financial year, not to expenses that have been actually paid during the previous year without deduction of tax at source.

Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. DCIT
372 ITR 33 · 2015 · High Court
136
citing judgments

Provisions of section 194H of the Income-tax Act are not applicable on the discount extended by a company to its distributors.

State Lotteries & Ors. (2001) 249 ITR 186 and Ahmedabad Stamp Vendors Association v. Union of India
257 ITR 202 · 2002 · High Court
121
citing judgments

For the provisions of Section 194H, along with Sections 201 and 201(1A), to be invoked for tax deduction at source on commission or brokerage, a principal-agency relationship is a prerequisite; transactions that are purely sales do not attract TDS under this section as they do not constitute 'commission'.

CIT v. HCL Comnet Systems & Services Ltd.
305 ITR 409 · 2008 · Supreme Court
118
citing judgments

For computing book profits under Section 115JB, an Assessing Officer's power is limited to examining duly certified books and making adjustments only as per the Explanation. A provision for bad and doubtful debts, being a diminution in the value of an asset (receivable), does not constitute a 'provision for liability' under Clause (c) of the Explanation and therefore cannot be added back.

Southern Switchgear Ltd. v. CIT
232 ITR 359 · 1998 · Supreme Court
99
citing judgments

Payments made for different subject matters, even if part of a larger transaction, can be separately classified as capital or revenue expenditure based on their individual nature and purpose. This distinction is crucial for determining tax deductibility, often applying the enduring benefit test.

Hindustan Coca Cola v. CIT
402 ITR 539 · 2018 · High Court
73
citing judgments

Section 194H of the Income-tax Act is not applicable to discounts extended by a principal to its distributors, as such discounts are not considered commission or brokerage liable for TDS.

Judgments on Section 194H

KRISHAN BATRA,FATEHABAD vs. ITO WARD 1, AYAKAR BHAWAN SIRSA ROAD

The appeal stands allowed

ITA 1546/CHANDI/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh19 Feb 2026AY 2023-24

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1546/Chandi/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2023-24) Shri Krishan Batra Ito Ward 1 114A, Anaj Mandi, Fatehbad बनाम/ Vs. Manju Complex Haryana - 125050 Fatehabad – 125 050 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Akgpb-9656-H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/Appellant By : Sh. J. P. Goyal (Ca) – Ld. Ar (Virtual) ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Sh. Vivek Vardhan (Addl. Cit) – Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18-02-2026 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 19/02/2026 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1. Aforesaid Appeal By Assessee For Assessment Year (Ay) 2023- 24 Arises Out Of An Order Of Learned Addl. / Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Mysore Dated 26-09-2025 In The Matter Of A Rectification Intimation As Issued By Cpc U/S 154 On 21-06-2024. The Sole Grievance Of The Assessee Is Denial Of Tax Credit For Rs.69,012/-. Having Heard Rival Submissions, The Appeal Is Disposed-Off As Under.

For Appellant: Sh. J. P. Goyal (CA) – Ld. AR (Virtual)For Respondent: Sh. Vivek Vardhan (Addl. CIT) – Ld. Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 194A

Showing 120 of 194 · Page 1 of 10

...