Section 201 of the Income Tax Act

The decision most relied on for Section 201 is MALPE VISHWANATH ACHARYA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER. 365 32 (9 SCC 1), cited in 533 of the 374 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 201

MALPE VISHWANATH ACHARYA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER. 365 32
9 SCC 1 · 2018 · Supreme Court
533
citing judgments

Fiscal statutes mandate strict compliance with regulatory requirements, especially for claiming benefits or exemption clauses. The doctrine of substantial compliance applies only when mandatory requirements are fully met, even if some directory requirements are not.

Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT
293 ITR 226 · 2007 · Supreme Court
484
citing judgments

The deductor cannot be treated as an assessee-in-default under Section 201(1) if the deductee has already paid the tax or offered the impugned receipts in their return of income. However, interest under Section 201(1A) for delayed deposit of tax can still be levied up to the date of filing of the return of income by the deductee.

254 ITR 121 (Guj) ITO v. Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Co. Ltd.
243 ITR 435 · 2000 · High Court
173
citing judgments
Jagaran Prakashan Ltd. v. DCIT
345 ITR 288 · 2012 · High Court
164
citing judgments

A deductor who receives Form 15H or Form 15G under Section 197A is not deemed an 'assessee in default' under Section 201(1) for non-deduction of tax, as there is no obligation to verify the payee's actual taxable income.

Chandra Kishore Jha v. Mahavir Prasad
8 SCC 266 · 1999 · Supreme Court
163
citing judgments

If a statute or law prescribes that a thing must be done in a particular manner, then it must be done in that manner alone and in no other way. This principle mandates strict adherence to statutory procedures.

CIT vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd (2008) 299 ITR 0356 (BOMBAY); CIT v. Semiconductor Complex Ltd.
282 ITR 263 · 2006 · High Court
159
citing judgments

An employer is not an 'assessee in default' under Section 201(1) if short or non-deduction of TDS on employee salaries or exempt income was due to a bona fide belief. The Assessing Officer must compute TDS liability based on the employee's actual income, and no interest under Section 201(1A) is leviable when such a bona fide belief exists.

Verizon Communications Singapore Pte Ltd. v. ITO
361 ITR 575 · 2014 · High Court
156
citing judgments

Payments for the use of equipment or copyrighted articles constitute royalty income under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, necessitating TDS deduction under section 195 and attracting disallowance under section 40(a)(i) for non-compliance.

Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage (P.) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
163 Taxmann 355 · 2007 · Supreme Court
134
citing judgments

A deductor cannot be treated as an 'assessee in default' under Section 201 of the Income Tax Act if the payee has already included the income in their return and paid tax on it. This principle applies due to the proviso to Section 201.

CIT v. Associated Cement Companies Ltd.
172 ITR 257 · 1988 · Supreme Court
126
citing judgments

An expenditure is classified as either capital or revenue; the 'enduring benefit' test is a key criterion for this distinction, and income tax law does not generally recognize deferred revenue expenditure unless specifically provided.

State Lotteries & Ors. (2001) 249 ITR 186 and Ahmedabad Stamp Vendors Association v. Union of India
257 ITR 202 · 2002 · High Court
121
citing judgments

For the provisions of Section 194H, along with Sections 201 and 201(1A), to be invoked for tax deduction at source on commission or brokerage, a principal-agency relationship is a prerequisite; transactions that are purely sales do not attract TDS under this section as they do not constitute 'commission'.

Judgments on Section 201

Showing 120 of 374 · Page 1 of 19

...