NIRMA LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of delayed payments to ESIC/PF, following its own prior decision. For the corporate guarantee commission, the Tribunal held it to be an international transaction and set the arm's length price (ALP) at 0.5%, partly allowing the Revenue's appeal on this issue.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Nirma Limited, filed appeals against the CIT(A)'s orders concerning disallowances related to delayed payments to ESIC/PF and depreciation on goodwill. The Revenue also filed cross-appeals challenging certain deletions made by the CIT(A), including those related to sales tax subsidy and corporate guarantee commission.
What were the issues?
The key issues involved the disallowance of delayed employee contributions to ESIC/PF and the benchmarking of corporate guarantee commission as an international transaction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 2(24)(x),Section 36(1)(va),Section 92B,Section 271(1)(c),Section 234B,Section 234C,Section 80IA
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(20)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- Goetze (India) Ltd. v. CIT1,842 citing157 Taxmann 1 · 2006 · SC
- CIT v. B.C. Srinivasa Setty628 citing5 Taxmann 1 · 1981 · SC
- CIT v. Smifs Securities Ltd.540 citing348 ITR 302 · 2012 · SC
- CIT v. Everest Kento Cylinders Ltd.304 citing58 Taxmann.com 254 · 2015 · HC
- 176 citing
- PCIT v. Redington (India) Ltd.132 citing122 Taxmann.com 136 · 2021 · HC
- Pr. CIT v. Ankit Metal & Power Ltd.77 citing109 Taxmann.com 93 · 2019 · HC
- Prolifics Corpn. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT45 citing68 SOT 104 · 2015 · ITAT
- United Breweries Ltd. v. ACIT41 citing76 Taxmann.com 103 · 2016 · ITAT · Read judgment
- CIT v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.40 citing29 Taxmann.com 405 · 2013 · HC · Read judgment
- 50%. (ii) Hindalco Industries Ltd. v. Addl. CIT38 citing62 Taxmann.com 181 · 2015 · ITAT
- Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. Add!. Cl'I37 citing43 Taxmann.com 150 · 2014 · HC
- Everest Kento Cylinder Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT37 citing56 Taxmann.com 361 · 2015 · SC
- 0.50%. (v) Mylan Laboratories Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT35 citing155 ITD 1123 · 2015 · ITAT
- (vii) Godrej Consumer Products Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT27 citing69 Taxmann.com 436 · 2016
- Aditya Birla Mincas Worldwide Ltd. v. Dy. CIT25 citing56 Taxmann.com 317 · 2015 · ITAT
- (i) Videocon Industries Ltd. v. Dy. CIT24 citing79 Taxmann.com 216 · 2017
- ALP. (iii) Manugraph India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT18 citing62 Taxmann.com 347 · 2015
- CIT v. Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd.5 citing76 Taxmann 328
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE- & MS. SUCHITRA R. KAMBLE
PER DR.B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT:
The present set of five appeals comprises three appeals filed by the assessee and two cross-appeals filed by the Revenue. The assessee’s appeals are directed against the orders of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-9, Ahmedabad dated 20.07.2017, 21.07.2017, and 22.01.2018, pertaining to the assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14, and 2014-15, respect
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 2(24)(x)
- Bharata Thakrya Thakur, Nerul, Navi Mumbai vs Assistant Director of Income Tax, BengaluruITA 6024/MUM/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Bharat Thakrya Thakur, Nerul, Navi Mumbai vs Assistant Director of Income Tax, BengaluruITA 6023/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Bharat Thakrya Thakur, Nerul, Navi Mumbai vs Assistant Director of Income Tax, BengaluruITA 6022/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Bharat Thakrya Thakur, Nerul, Navi Mumbai vs Assistant Director of Income Tax, BengaluruITA 6021/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Manipal Technologies Limited, Manipal vs ITO 1 Udupi, UdupiITA 10/BANG/2026[2018-2019]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2018-2019
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026