CIT v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

29 Taxmann.com 405High Court2013#3022 most cited

What is CIT v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. authority for?

Expenditure incurred on an independent research centre and R&D unit is eligible for deduction under Section 35(1)(iv) of the Income Tax Act, and such expenditure need not be reduced from profits.

40

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. · Section 35(1)(iv) · R&D expenditure · independent research centre · deduction for R&D unit · eligibility for deduction

Also reported as

393 ITR 625263 CTR 683

Sections most often in play

Section 115JBSection 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 234BSection 144Section 234CSection 271(1)(c)

Issues it is cited on

goodwill arising on amalgamationsection 43(6)(c)section 35(1)(iv)section 2(11)section 36(l)(va)export oriented unitsection 43(6)opening wdvr&d expendituresection 92b(1)minimum alternate taxdepreciation on goodwill

Judgments citing CIT v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

ZENSAR TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CIRCLE 2(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal is allowed

ITA 3439/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Feb 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 10ASection 115JSection 142(1)Section 263Section 80GSection 80J

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “G” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.3439/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2020-21) Zensar Technologies Ltd., Magnet House, 2nd Floor, N.M. Marg, Ballard Estate, Mumbai – 400001 (Appellant) PAN NO. AAACF 0742K PCIT, Room No.344, Aayakar Bhawan, Vs. M.K. Road, Mumbai – 400020 (Respondent) Appellant by Shri Nitesh Joshi, And Shri Ninad Patade Respondent by Shri Arun Kanti Datta, (CIT- DR) (Appellant) (Respondent) Date of Hearing 29.01.2026 Date of Pronouncement 12.02.2026 ORDER Per Saktijit Dey, Vice President: In t…

UNIMED TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED,HALOL vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), VADODARA

In the result, the Departmental appeal is dismissed for AY 2017-18

ITA 1425/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sher Singh, CIT-DR &
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 250Section 263

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद "ायपीठ “D“,अहमदाबाद । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “ D ” BENCH, AHMEDABAD ] ] BEFORE SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER 1. आयकर अपील सं /ITA No.1423/Ahd/2024 – Asst.Year 2017-18 2. आयकर अपील सं /ITA No.1425/Ahd/2024 – Asst.Year 2017-18 1. The ACIT 1. Unimed Technologies Ltd. बनाम/ Race Course Baska Ujiti Road Baska v/s. Vadodara – 390 007 Halol Dist., Panchmahal., Panchmahal – 389 350 2. Unimed Technologies 2. The ACIT Ltd. Circle-2(1)(1) Baska Ujiti Road Baska Vadodara – 390 007 Halol Dist., Panchmahal., Panchmah…

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, RACE COURSE, VADODARA vs. UNIMED TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, HALOL PANCHMAHAL

In the result, the Departmental appeal is dismissed for AY 2017-18

ITA 1423/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sher Singh, CIT-DR &
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 250Section 263

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद "ायपीठ “D“,अहमदाबाद । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “ D ” BENCH, AHMEDABAD ] ] BEFORE SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER 1. आयकर अपील सं /ITA No.1423/Ahd/2024 – Asst.Year 2017-18 2. आयकर अपील सं /ITA No.1425/Ahd/2024 – Asst.Year 2017-18 1. The ACIT 1. Unimed Technologies Ltd. बनाम/ Race Course Baska Ujiti Road Baska v/s. Vadodara – 390 007 Halol Dist., Panchmahal., Panchmahal – 389 350 2. Unimed Technologies 2. The ACIT Ltd. Circle-2(1)(1) Baska Ujiti Road Baska Vadodara – 390 007 Halol Dist., Panchmahal., Panchmah…

THE ACTI , CIRCLE-3(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. NIRMA LIMITED,, AHMEDABAD

ITA 1437/AHD/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Aug 2025AY 2016-17
For Appellant: \nShri Bandish Soparkar, withFor Respondent: \nShri Alpesh Parmar, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14A

…{ "clean_text": "आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद न्यायपीठ “ A", अहमदाबाद।\nIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL\n“ A \" BENCH, AHMEDABAD\nBEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER\nAND\nSHRI MAKARAND V. MAHADEOKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nआयकर अपील सं/ITA Nos.1412 & 1413/Ahd/2019\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years: (2015-2016 & 2016-17)\nNirma Limited,\nNirma House,\nAshram Road,\nAhmedabad-380009.\n(Gujarat)\nबनाम /\nv/s.\nThe Deputy Commissioner\nof Income Tax,\nCircle 3(1)(1),\nAhmedabad.\nस्थायी लेखा सं./PAN : AAACN5350K\nआयकर अपील सं/ITA Nos.1436-1437/Ahd/2019\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : (2015-16 & 2016-17)\…

THE ACTI , CIRCLE-3(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. NIRMA LIMITED,, AHMEDABAD

ITA 1436/AHD/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Aug 2025AY 2015-16
For Appellant: \nShri Bandish Soparkar, withFor Respondent: \nShri Alpesh Parmar, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14A

…{ "clean_text": "आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद न्यायपीठ “ A", अहमदाबाद।\nIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL\n“ A \" BENCH, AHMEDABAD\nBEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER\nAND\nSHRI MAKARAND V. MAHADEOKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nआयकर अपील सं/ITA Nos.1412 & 1413/Ahd/2019\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years: (2015-2016 & 2016-17)\nNirma Limited,\nNirma House,\nAshram Road,\nAhmedabad-380009.\n(Gujarat)\nबनाम /\nv/s.\nThe Deputy Commissioner\nof Income Tax,\nCircle 3(1)(1),\nAhmedabad.\nस्थायी लेखा सं./PAN : AAACN5350K\nआयकर अपील सं/ITA Nos.1436-1437/Ahd/2019\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : (2015-16 & 2016-17)\…

NIRMA LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCTI , CIRCLE-3(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD

ITA 1413/AHD/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Aug 2025AY 2016-17
For Appellant: \nShri Bandish Soparkar, withFor Respondent: \nShri Alpesh Parmar, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14A

…{ "clean_text": "आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद न्यायपीठ “ A", अहमदाबाद।\nIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL\n“ A \" BENCH, AHMEDABAD\nBEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER\nAND\nSHRI MAKARAND V. MAHADEOKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nआयकर अपील सं/ITA Nos.1412 & 1413/Ahd/2019\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years: (2015-2016 & 2016-17)\nNirma Limited,\nNirma House,\nAshram Road,\nAhmedabad-380009.\n(Gujarat)\nबनाम /\nv/s.\nThe Deputy Commissioner\nof Income Tax,\nCircle 3(1)(1),\nAhmedabad.\nस्थायी लेखा सं./PAN : AAACN5350K\nआयकर अपील सं/ITA Nos.1436-1437/Ahd/2019\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : (2015-16 & 2016-17)\…

NIRMA LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCTI , CIRCLE-3(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD

ITA 1412/AHD/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Aug 2025AY 2015-16
For Appellant: \nShri Bandish Soparkar, withFor Respondent: \nShri Alpesh Parmar, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14A

…{ "clean_text": "आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद न्यायपीठ “ A", अहमदाबाद।\nIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL\n“ A \" BENCH, AHMEDABAD\nBEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER\nAND\nSHRI MAKARAND V. MAHADEOKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nआयकर अपील सं/ITA Nos.1412 & 1413/Ahd/2019\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years: (2015-2016 & 2016-17)\nNirma Limited,\nNirma House,\nAshram Road,\nAhmedabad-380009.\n(Gujarat)\nThe Deputy Commissioner\nबनाम /\nof Income Tax,\nv/s.\nCircle 3(1)(1),\nAhmedabad.\nस्थायी लेखा सं./PAN : AAACN5350K\nआयकर अपील सं/ITA Nos.1436-1437/Ahd/2019\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : (2015-16 & 2016-17)\…

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1)(1), VADODARA, RACE COURSE vs. UNIMED TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, HALOL

ITA 632/AHD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Jul 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: S/Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Makarand V.Mahadeokar

For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sher Singh, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 234BSection 250Section 271(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 37(1)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद न्यायपीठ 'D' अहमदाबाद। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE S/SHRI T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND MAKARAND V.MAHADEOKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.623/Ahd/2024 Asstt.Year : 2016-17 Unimed Technologies Limited Vs. Vs. ACIT, Cir.2(1)(1) Vadodara. Survey No.22 and 22, Baska, Ujeti Halol Panchmahal PAN: AAACE 4022 В ITA No.632/Ahd/2024 Asstt.Year : 2016-17 ACIT, Cir.2(1)(1) Vadodara. Unimed Technologies Limited Vs. Survey No.22 and 22, Baska, Ujeti Halol Panchmahal PAN : AAACE 4022 B (Applicant) (Responent) Assessee by : Shri Bandish Soparkar, AR Revenu…

UNIMED TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED,PANCHMAHAL vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), VADODARA

ITA 623/AHD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Jul 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: S/Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Makarand V.Mahadeokarasstt.Year : 2016-17 Unimed Technologies Limited Acit, Cir.2(1)(1) Survey No.22 & 22, Vs. Vadodara. Baska, Ujeti Halol Panchmahal Pan : Aaace 4022 B Asstt.Year : 2016-17 Acit, Cir.2(1)(1) Unimed Technologies Limited Vadodara. Vs. Survey No.22 & 22, Baska, Ujeti Halol Panchmahal Pan : Aaace 4022 B (Applicant) (Responent) : Shri Bandish Soparkar, Ar Assessee By : Shri Sher Singh, Cit-Dr Revenue By सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 17/07/2025 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 24/07/2025 आदेश आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश

For Appellant: Shri Sher Singh, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 234BSection 250Section 271(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 37(1)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ ‘D’ अहमदाबाद। अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ अहमदाबाद। अहमदाबाद। अहमदाबाद। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD ]BEFORE S/SHRI T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND MAKARAND V.MAHADEOKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Asstt.Year : 2016-17 Unimed Technologies Limited ACIT, Cir.2(1)(1) Survey No.22 and 22, Vs. Vadodara. Baska, Ujeti Halol Panchmahal PAN : AAACE 4022 B Asstt.Year : 2016-17 ACIT, Cir.2(1)(1) Unimed Technologies Limited Vadodara. Vs. Survey No.22 and 22, Baska, Ujeti Halol Panch…

JT. CTI (OSD), CIRCLE-3(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. NIRMA LIMITED,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue and the appeals for AYs 2012-

ITA 791/AHD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Jun 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice- & Ms. Suchitra R. Kamble

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Alpesh Parmar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)Section 234BSection 271

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ ‘A’ अहमदाबाद। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT AND MS. SUCHITRA R. KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.2007 & 2008/Ahd/2017 AND Assessment Year : 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 Nirma Limited, DCIT, Cir.3(1)(1) Nirma House, Ashram Road Vs Ahmedabad. Ahmedabad 380 009 PAN : AAACN 5350 K AND Assessment Year : 2013-14 & 2014-15 DCIT, Cir.3(1)(1) Nirma Limited, Ahmedabad. Vs Nirma House, Ashram Road Ahmedabad 380 009 PAN : AAACN 5350 K (Appellant) (Responent) Assessee by : Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr.Advocate, Smt.Urvashi Shodhan…

NIRMA LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue and the appeals for AYs 2012-

ITA 516/AHD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Jun 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice- & Ms. Suchitra R. Kamble

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Alpesh Parmar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)Section 234BSection 271

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ ‘A’ अहमदाबाद। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT AND MS. SUCHITRA R. KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.2007 & 2008/Ahd/2017 AND Assessment Year : 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 Nirma Limited, DCIT, Cir.3(1)(1) Nirma House, Ashram Road Vs Ahmedabad. Ahmedabad 380 009 PAN : AAACN 5350 K AND Assessment Year : 2013-14 & 2014-15 DCIT, Cir.3(1)(1) Nirma Limited, Ahmedabad. Vs Nirma House, Ashram Road Ahmedabad 380 009 PAN : AAACN 5350 K (Appellant) (Responent) Assessee by : Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr.Advocate, Smt.Urvashi Shodhan…

THE DCIT, CIR-3(1)(1), AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. NIRMA LIMITED,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue and the appeals for AYs 2012-

ITA 2224/AHD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Jun 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice- & Ms. Suchitra R. Kamble

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Alpesh Parmar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)Section 234BSection 271

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ ‘A’ अहमदाबाद। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT AND MS. SUCHITRA R. KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.2007 & 2008/Ahd/2017 AND Assessment Year : 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 Nirma Limited, DCIT, Cir.3(1)(1) Nirma House, Ashram Road Vs Ahmedabad. Ahmedabad 380 009 PAN : AAACN 5350 K AND Assessment Year : 2013-14 & 2014-15 DCIT, Cir.3(1)(1) Nirma Limited, Ahmedabad. Vs Nirma House, Ashram Road Ahmedabad 380 009 PAN : AAACN 5350 K (Appellant) (Responent) Assessee by : Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr.Advocate, Smt.Urvashi Shodhan…

M/S. NIRMA LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue and the appeals for AYs 2012-

ITA 2008/AHD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Jun 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice- & Ms. Suchitra R. Kamble

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Alpesh Parmar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)Section 234BSection 271

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ ‘A’ अहमदाबाद। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT AND MS. SUCHITRA R. KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.2007 & 2008/Ahd/2017 AND Assessment Year : 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 Nirma Limited, DCIT, Cir.3(1)(1) Nirma House, Ashram Road Vs Ahmedabad. Ahmedabad 380 009 PAN : AAACN 5350 K AND Assessment Year : 2013-14 & 2014-15 DCIT, Cir.3(1)(1) Nirma Limited, Ahmedabad. Vs Nirma House, Ashram Road Ahmedabad 380 009 PAN : AAACN 5350 K (Appellant) (Responent) Assessee by : Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr.Advocate, Smt.Urvashi Shodhan…

M/S. NIRMA LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue and the appeals for AYs 2012-\n13 & 2013-14 filed by the assessee are partly allowed, while the appeal of the assessee\nfor AY 2014-15 is allowed

ITA 2007/AHD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Jun 2025AY 2012-13
For Appellant: \nShri S.N. Soparkar, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: \nShri Alpesh Parmar, CIT-DR
Section 2(24)(x)Section 234BSection 271

…{ "clean_text": "आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, अहमदाबाद न्यायपीठ ‘A' अहमदाबाद।\nIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL\n“A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD\nBEFORE DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT\nAND\nMS. SUCHITRA R. KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER\nITA No.2007 & 2008/Ahd/2017\nAND\nITA No.516/AHD/2018\n Assessment Year : 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15\nNirma Limited,\nNirma House, Ashram Road\nAhmedabad 380 009\nPAN: AAACN 5350 K\nVs\nDCIT, Cir.3(1)(1)\nAhmedabad.\nITA No.2224/Ahd/2017\nAND\nITA No.791/Ahd/2018\n Assessment Year: 2013-14 & 2014-15\nDCIT, Cir.3(1)(1)\nAhmedabad.\nVs\nNirma Limited,\nNirma House, Ashram Road\nAhmedabad 380 009\nPAN…

M/S. CADILA PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. ,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purpose and the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 383/AHD/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad12 Nov 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokarassessment Year: 2012-13

Section 115JSection 144Section 2Section 35Section 36(1)(iii)Section 36(1)(vii)Section 37Section 43BSection 80I

…ITA Nos.345 & 383/Ahd/2020 Assessment Years: 2012-13 Page 1 of 20 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2012-13 The Deputy Commissioner of M/s. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Income Tax, Limited, Circle – 1(1)(2), 708, Cadila Corporate Campus Ahmedabad. Vs. Sarkhej Dholka Road, Bhat, Ahmedabad – 382 210. [PAN – AAACC 6251 E] Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/s. Cadila Pharmaceuticals The Deputy Commissioner of Limited, Income Tax, 708, Cadila Corporate Campus, Circle – 1(1)(2), Sa…

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. CADILA PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. , AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purpose and the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 345/AHD/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad12 Nov 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokarassessment Year: 2012-13

Section 115JSection 144Section 2Section 35Section 36(1)(iii)Section 36(1)(vii)Section 37Section 43BSection 80I

…ITA Nos.345 & 383/Ahd/2020 Assessment Years: 2012-13 Page 1 of 20 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2012-13 The Deputy Commissioner of M/s. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Income Tax, Limited, Circle – 1(1)(2), 708, Cadila Corporate Campus Ahmedabad. Vs. Sarkhej Dholka Road, Bhat, Ahmedabad – 382 210. [PAN – AAACC 6251 E] Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/s. Cadila Pharmaceuticals The Deputy Commissioner of Limited, Income Tax, 708, Cadila Corporate Campus, Circle – 1(1)(2), Sa…

TORRENT PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-4(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the Revenue is hereby partly allowed

ITA 1172/AHD/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad26 Feb 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri Vartik Choksi, With Shri DhrunalBhatt, ARsFor Respondent: Shri Ritesh Parmar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 35Section 43BSection 80

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND Ms. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA(TP).No.2365 and 2366/Ahd/2018 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Years: 2013-14 and 2014-15 Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. D.C.I.T, Circle-4(1)(2) Torrent House, Vs. Ahmedabad. Nr. Dinesh Hall, Off.Ashram Road Ahmedabad 380009. PAN: AAACT5456A And Asstt. Year 2015-16 Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. A.C.I.T, Circle-4(1)(2) Torrent House, Vs. Ahmedabad. Nr. Dinesh Hall, Off.Ashram Road Ahmedabad 380 009. PAN: AAACT5456A आयकर अपील सं./ITA.…

ACIT -3(1)(2), MUMBAI vs. HIKAL LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, the In the result, the appeal of Revenue for assessment year 2010

ITA 2320/MUM/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Dec 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Rahul Chaudhary () Assessment Year: 2010-11 & Assessment Year: 2011-12 Acit-3(1)(2), Hikal Ltd., Room No. 607, 6Th Floor, 717/718, Maker Chambers V, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Nariman Point, Mumbai-400020. Mumbai-400021. Pan No. Aaach 0383 A Appellant Respondent : Revenue By Mr. Sanjay Vishwas Rao Deshmukh, Cit-Dr/ Mr. R.N. D’Souza, Dr Assessee By : Mr. Sanjay Parikh, Ar : Date Of Hearing 02/11/2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 28/12/2022

For Appellant: Mr. Sanjay Parikh, ARFor Respondent: Revenue by Mr. Sanjay Vishwas Rao
Section 14A

…wer deployed in each unit; c) Decision of Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of CIT vs c) Decision of Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of CIT vs c) Decision of Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of CIT vs Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd reported in 393 ITR 625 (Guj) Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd reported in 393 ITR 625 (Guj) Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd reported in 393 ITR 625 (Guj) which is directly addressed on the point of independent which is directly addressed on the point of independent which is directly addressed on the point of independent research centre and also on the point of expenditure of R&…

DCIT, CIR-3(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. SHRI JOGENDRA L. BHATI, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2342/AHD/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad26 Aug 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Smt.Suchitra Kambleassessment Year : 2014-15 Dcit, Cir.3(1)(1) Vs. Shri Jogendra L. Bhati Ahmedabad. 11, Kapidhwaj Bungalow Jodhpur Village Road Ahmedabad 380 015. Pan : Ahcpb 0228 N अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/(Respondent) Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 08/08/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 26/08/2022 आदेश/O R D E R

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 250(6)

…se for the immediately preceding year i.e. for Asst. Year 2013-14 and the CIT(A) vide order No. CIT[A)-9/10599/DCIT. Cir.3(l)(l]/15-16 dated 04.07.2011 relying on the decisions of the Hon. Gujarat High Court in the cases of CIT v/s. Torrent Pharma Ltd. (2013) 29 Taxmann.com 405 and Cadila Healthcare Ltd in Tax Appeal No 752 of 2012 has decided the issue in favour of the appellant by holding that the said expenses were in the nature of revenue expenses. The relevant part of the finding of the CIT(A) is reproduced as under: "4.2 I have carefully considered the rival contentions, case law relied upon and observation…

HIKAL LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CIR 3(1), MUMBAI

In the result appeal of the assessee for A

ITA 5388/MUM/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Aug 2022AY 2009-10
Section 10ASection 10BSection 143(3)

…EHPT India P Ltd reported in 350 ITR 41 (Del) which is directly addressed on the method of allocation of expenses based on manpower deployed in each unit; c) Decision of Hon‟ble Gujarat High Court in the case of CIT vs Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd reported in 393 ITR 625 (Guj) which is directly addressed on the point of independent research centre and also on the point M/s. Hikal Ltd., of expenditure of R&D unit which is eligible for deduction u/s 35(1)(iv) of the Act need not be reduced from profits ; d) Decision of Hon‟ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Zandu Pharmaceuticals Works Ltd vs CIT reported…

Showing 1–20 of 40 · Page 1 of 2