M/S UNITED BREWERIES LTD. vs. CIT,
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's submission that the appeal had become infructuous. This was because subsequent orders and appeals related to the same issue had led to the matter being set aside to the AO for fresh consideration.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was against an order passed by the CIT under Section 263. The CIT believed the AO erred in not adding a sum disallowed under Section 14A to the book profits for the purpose of Section 115JB.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT correctly exercised his revisional powers under Section 263. Whether the disallowance under Section 14A should have been added to book profits under Section 115JB.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN & SHRI ABRAHAM P. GEORGE
Per N.V. Vasudevan, Judicial Member
This appeal by the assessee is against the order dated 28.2.2011 of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Bangalore-III passed u/s. 263 of the Act in relation to assessment year 2006-07.
The assessee is a company engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of beer. The AO completed the assessment u/s. 143(3) of the Act determining total income under the provisions of section 115JB of the Act as the tax payable on the book profits u/s. 115JB of the Act was higher than the total income and tax payable thereon under the normal provisions of the Act.
By the impugned order the CIT was of the view that while computing book profits u/s. 115JB of the Act, the AO failed to add to the book profits a sum of Rs.4,26,75,114 which was the sum disallowed by invoking provisions of section 14A of the Act, while computing total income of the assessee under the normal provisions of the Act by the AO. According to the CIT, the aforesaid sum disallowed u/s. 14A was required to be added to the profit as per profit & loss account in view of Explanation 1(f) to section 115JB of the act to arrive at the book profits.
Aggrieved by the aforesaid order of CIT, the assessee has filed the present appeal before the Tribunal.
At the time of hearing of appeal, it was brought to our notice that consequent to the passing of impugned order by the CIT u/s. 263 of the Act, the AO passed an order of assessment dated 21.1.2013 giving effect to the directions of CIT. In the said order, the AO added to the profit as per profit & loss account the amount disallowed u/s. 14A of the Act for the purpose of computing book profits u/s. 115JB of the Act. The assessee filed an appeal against the said order and CIT(Appeals) by order dated 9.10.2013 deleted the addition made by the AO against which revenue filed an appeal in before the Tribunal. Against the original order of assessment dated 29.12.2008, an appeal was filed by the assessee before CIT(A), who by an order dated 7.10.2013 deleted the addition made by the AO u/s. 14A of the Act. The Revenue filed an appeal before the Tribunal in ITA No.84/Bang/2014. Both the appeals were heard by this Tribunal together and by an order dated 24.11.2014, the Tribunal set aside the issue to the AO for consideration afresh in the light of observations made in the said order.
The ld. counsel for the assessee therefore submitted that the present appeal by the assessee has become infructuous.
The submission made was considered and accepted. Accordingly, the appeal by the assessee is dismissed as infructuous.
Pronounced in the open court on this 20th day of February, 2015.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026