Everest Kento Cylinder Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT
56 Taxmann.com 361Supreme Court of India2015#3203 most cited
What is Everest Kento Cylinder Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT authority for?
An assessee must provide evidence to prove the actual rendering of services for expenses claimed, as each assessment year is a separate unit of assessment and res judicata or consistency principles do not override the burden of proof.
37
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.
Also referred to as
Everest Kento Cylinder Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT · 56 Taxmann.com 361 · SC 2015 · burden of proof · actual rendering of services · res judicata · assessment year · independent unit
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing Everest Kento Cylinder Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT
Showing 1–20 of 37 · Page 1 of 2