THE PRL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. L SURYAKANTHAM, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal fails and is hereby dismissed

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI

260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’, for short) has been filed by the revenue. The subject matter of the appeal pertains to the Assessment Year 2010-11. The appeal was admitted by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 09.11.2018 on the following substantial question of law: "Whether on the facts

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S. PADMAVATHI MANSION (P) LTD., VIJAYAWADA

Bench: C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,T.AMARNATH GOUD

Transfer of Shares in Tax Havens (like in the case of Vodafone etc.), if based on relevant facts, such substantial questions of law could be raised before the High Court under Section 260-A of the Act, the Courts could have embarked upon such exercise of framing and answering such substantial question of law. On the other hand, the appeals

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HYD vs. M/S CONEXANT SYSTEMS PRIVATE LTD., HYD

Appeals are dismissed on withdrawal

Bench: C.V. BHASKAR REDDY,UJJAL BHUYAN

Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the lncome Tax Appellant Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A' Hyderabad in ITA No.453lHydl2O14 for assessment Year 2009-2010 dated 19.10.2016 preferred against the Order of the Additional Commissioner of lncome Tax (Transfer Pricing

PRINICIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7, HYD vs. M/S. DECCAN GRAMEENA BANK, HYD

Appeals are dismissed on withdrawal

Bench: C.V. BHASKAR REDDY,UJJAL BHUYAN

Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the lncome Tax Appellant Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A' Hyderabad in ITA No.453lHydl2O14 for assessment Year 2009-2010 dated 19.10.2016 preferred against the Order of the Additional Commissioner of lncome Tax (Transfer Pricing

THE PRINCIPAL COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I vs. M/S.CELON LABORATOERIES PVT LTD

Appeals are dismissed on withdrawal

Bench: C.V. BHASKAR REDDY,UJJAL BHUYAN

Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the lncome Tax Appellant Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A' Hyderabad in ITA No.453lHydl2O14 for assessment Year 2009-2010 dated 19.10.2016 preferred against the Order of the Additional Commissioner of lncome Tax (Transfer Pricing

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7, HYD vs. M/S. DECCAN GRAMEENA BANK, HYD

Appeals are dismissed on withdrawal

Bench: C.V. BHASKAR REDDY,UJJAL BHUYAN

Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the lncome Tax Appellant Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A' Hyderabad in ITA No.453lHydl2O14 for assessment Year 2009-2010 dated 19.10.2016 preferred against the Order of the Additional Commissioner of lncome Tax (Transfer Pricing

The Commisioner of Income TAx-1 vs. Divya Shakti Granites Ltd.,

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

price component is already paid and what remains to be paid is Rs.49,80,000/-. Vouchsafing the title to property is a predominant obligation of the vendor, vide condition Nos.6, 7 & 8 in Ex.P4, is not disputed before us. Paragraph 2 stipulates that the plaintiff has to pay this amount in two installments: First installment of Rs.34

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-3 vs. M/s Sri Indra Power Energies Limited

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Transfer of Shares in Tax Havens (like in the case of Vodafone etc.), if based on relevant facts, such substantial questions of law could be raised before the High Court under Section 260-A of the Act, the Courts could have embarked upon such exercise of framing and answering such substantial question of law. On Date of Judgment

The Commissioner of income Tax-III, vs. M/S Raj Breeders and Hatcheries [Pvt.] Ltd.,

In the result, we do not find any merit in this appeal

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 was admitted by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 05.04.2011 on the following substantial questions of law: i) Whether the stocks transferred on cost price

Vodafone Idea Limited vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

The appeal is disposed of with liberty as prayed for by the learned

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,N.TUKARAMJI

Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, ‘the Act’) questioning the correctness and legality of order dated 11.3.2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ Bench, Bengaluru (for short, ‘Appellate Authority’) in ITA.No.536/Bang/2017 for the assessment year 2010-11, raising the following substantial questions of law: “1. Whether on the facts and circumstances

Commissioner of Income Tax III vs. SVEC Constructions Limited

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Transfer of Shares in Tax Havens Date of Judgment 12-07-2018, ITA No.484/2013 The Commissioner of Income Tax & another Vs. M/s 3D PLM Software Solutions Limited 9/11 (like in the case of Vodafone etc.), if based on relevant facts, such substantial questions of law could be raised before the High Court under Section 260

The COmmissioner of Income Tax -IV vs. Nagarjuna Aqua Exports Ltd.,

Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM,C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY

Transfer of Shares in Tax Havens (like in the case of Vodafone etc.), if based on relevant facts, such substantial questions of law could be raised before the High Court under Section 260-A of the Act, the Courts could have embarked upon such exercise of framing and answering such substantial question of law. On the other hand, the appeals

The Commissioner of Income Tax [Central] vs. Sri K S V Raja

Transfer of Shares in Tax Havens (like in the case of Vodafone etc.), if based on relevant facts, such substantial questions of law could be raised before the High Court under Section 260-A of the Act, the Courts could have embarked upon such exercise of framing and answering such substantial question of law. On the other hand, the appeals

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-3, vs. M/s Novus GBS Private Limited,

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Transfer of Shares in Tax Havens (like in the case of Vodafone etc.), if based on relevant facts, such substantial questions of law could be raised before the High Court under Section 260-A of the Act, the Courts could have embarked upon such exercise of framing and answering such substantial question of law. On the other hand, the appeals

Commissioner of Income Tax- III vs. K.Vasundhara,

Transfer of Shares in Tax Havens (like in the case of Vodafone etc.), if based on relevant facts, such substantial questions of law could be raised before the High Court under Section 260-A of the Act, the Courts could have embarked upon such exercise of framing and answering such substantial question of law. On the other hand, the appeals

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax [Central] vs. M/s Nallamala Agro Farms Pvt Ltd.,

Bench: J. UMA DEVI,V RAMASUBRAMANIAN

Transfer of Shares in Tax Havens (like in the case of Vodafone etc.), if based on relevant facts, such substantial questions of law could be raised before the High Court under Section 260-A of the Act, the Courts could have embarked upon such exercise of framing and answering such substantial question of law. On the other hand, the appeals

The Prl. Commissioner of Income Tax-4, vs. M/s. Prabhath Agri Bio Tech P. Ltd.,

Bench: ANIS,SANJAY KUMAR

Transfer of Shares in Tax Havens (like in the case of Vodafone etc.), if based on relevant facts, such substantial questions of law could be raised before the High Court under Section 260-A of the Act, the Courts could have embarked upon such exercise of framing and Date of Judgment 25-07-2018 I.T.A.No.495/2016 Principal Commissioner of Income

The Director of Income Tax, (Exemptions) vs. Exhibition Society

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Transfer of Shares in Tax Havens (like in the case of Vodafone etc.), if based on relevant facts, such substantial questions of law could be raised before the High Court under Section 260-A of the Act, the Courts could have embarked upon such exercise of framing and Date of Judgment 19-07-2018 I.T.A.No.656/2015 The Commissioner of Income