Commissioner of Income Tax, Guntur. vs. Agricultural Market Committee, Kangiri.

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Trust or other legal obligation wholly for religious or charitable purposes. “Charitable Purposes” includes relief to the poor

The Commissioner of Income Tax-I vs. Ascend Telecom Infrastructure Private Limited

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Charitable Trust. It was registered as a Public Charitable Trust. It was also registered with the Commissioner

The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV vs. Moschip Semiconductor Technology Ltd.,

The appeal stands dismissed

Bench: GODA RAGHURAM,M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO

trust for charitable purpose or a charitable institution created or established after the commencement of this Act, any income

PRL COMMR OF INCOME TAX, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DIST vs. V DWARAKANATH REDDY, CHITTOOR

The appeals are hereby dismissed

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI

Trust are for charitable purposes. This Court in case of the assessee-Trust itself had considered the provisions

M/s Sri Surya Constructions vs. The Income Tax Officer

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,N.TUKARAMJI

Charitable Trust and Educational Charitable Society v. Ponniamman Educational Trust [Church of Christ Charitable Trust

The Commissioner of Income Tax I vs. M/s. Biological E. Ltd.,

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,SANJAY KUMAR

Trust was not carrying on activity as per Section 2(15) of 1961 Act wherein charitable activity has been

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2 vs. M/s Indur Green Power Private Limited

In the result, all the appeals fail and are hereby

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Charitable Trust engaged in the activity of preservation of environment by providing pollution control treatment for disposal of the liquid

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS) vs. M/S JAYADARSHINI HOUSING PVT LTD

The appeal is allowed

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

Trust, a public charitable trust, was created in the year 2007. Therefore, its governance would be subject

The Commissioner of Income Tax - IV vs. M/s. Mekins Agro Product (P) Ltd.

CHARITABLE TRUST Respondent Through Mr. Ajay VohrawithMs. Kavita Jha, Mr. Vaibhav Kulkami and Ms. Bhoomika Chaudhary, Advocates. + ITA 336/2013

AP State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited vs. The Income Tax Officer

In the result, the Appeals are partly allowed

Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO,ALOK ARADHE

Charitable Trust a , and Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption5f, Pune vs Audyogik Shikshan Mandals. It is pointed out that

Samaj Seva Nidhi, vs. ACIT [Inv] circle-II

Bench: A RAMALINGESWARA RAO,DILIP B. BHOSALE

Trust formed for charitable purposes by a deed of trust dated 17.11.1995. The objects of the Trust

Commissioner of Income Tax-1, vs. Agricultural Market Committee,

Bench: This Court Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter To Be Referred As “The Act”) Against The Order Dated 16.07.2010 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench-A, Chandigarh (Hereinafter To Be Referred As “The Itat”) In Ita No. 510/Chd/2010 - M/S Young Scholars Educational Society, Barnala Vs Cit, Patiala, Whereby The Order Dated 26.03.2010 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala (Hereinafter To Be Referred As “The Commissioner”) Was Quashed & The Varinder Singh 2024.05.13 10:09 I Attest To The Accuracy & Authencity Of This Order/Judgment

Trust claiming to be engaged in charitable activities by providing financial assistance to poor and needy students by way of fee concession

Smt.Sudia Indira vs. The Income Tax Officer

In the result, the appeal from order stand dismissed

Charitable Trust and Educational Charitable Society represented by its  Chairman Vs. Ponniamman Educational Trust reported in (2012) 8 SCC  706.. 12. Normally

Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-3 vs. M/s.R.A.K.Ceramics India Private Limited

Appeals are allowed; and

Bench: SANJAY KUMAR,M.S.K.JAISWAL

charitable Trust. It has received money as donation and shown the same in Income and Expenditure account. For the Assessment

The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV vs. M/s.Mold-Tek Technologies Ltd

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

trust still can be said to be for charitable purpose within the meaning of Section 2(15) of the Act and same

Commissioner of Income-tax-VI vs. Sri Premchand Kothari

Bench: The Itat Against The Respondent-Assessee For The Assessment Years (Ays) 2007-08 Till 2012-13.

Charitable Trust v. Union of India (2010) 327 ITR 73 (P & H). Reference was again made to the decision

M/S NATIONAL ACADEMY OF CONSTRUCTION vs. ASST. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

charitable or religious trust or irrstitution will not be entitled to exemption under Sections 11 and I 2, if certain

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) vs. Sri.G.Sanjay Chowdary

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

trust or institution undertaking such activity or activities, of that previous year. With regard to the aspect of advancement of any other object of general public utility, the proviso states that the same shall not be a charitable