Landmark Cases on Business Income and Deductions

2,356 decisions, ranked by how many judgments on BharatTax rely on them.

5 Case Laws: In Sanjay Kumar Garg v. ACIT
144 TTJ 77 · ITAT
19
citing judgments

Additions to income cannot be made on the entire bank deposit where only commission income is earned. The Assessing Officer should consider only the commission income on the turnover generated in the bank account.

Pharmanza Herbal (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT
155 Taxmann.com 56 · 2023 · ITAT
19
citing judgments

The Assessing Officer cannot disregard the decision of the designated authority (DSIR) regarding scientific research and development (R&D) expenditure. Disallowance of weighted deduction under section 35(2AB) solely because the amount was not approved by DSIR is unsustainable.

Mahalaxmi Sugar Mills Company v. Commissioner of Income Tax
157 ITR 683 · 1986 · High Court
19
citing judgments

Payments classified as wharfage charges are not penal in nature and are allowable as a deduction under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This decision is considered authoritative, even when contrasted with other High Court judgments.

Om Prakash Gupta v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
16 STC 935 · 1965 · High Court
19
citing judgments

An operation constitutes 'processing' if, as a result of the operation, the commodity experiences some change. This can occur through mechanical force or pressure without the addition of other materials.

43 7. Sneh Lata vs. CIT 61 ITR 139, 143 (1), CIT vs. Jagdish 51 ITR 266 (2), Prabhudas v. CIT
161 ITR 82 · 1986 · High Court
19
citing judgments

The interpretation of 'source' of income is not limited to the head of income under the Income Tax Act but refers to the specific origin from which income or expenditure arises.

CIT v. CIT Vs Dusad Industries
162 ITR 784 · 1986 · High Court
19
citing judgments

Subsidies provided by the government to newly established industries under a scheme for backward area development were considered capital receipts, not taxable revenue receipts, if their object was not to supplement profits but to promote industry establishment.

Eveready Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. v. ACIT
17 Taxmann.com 254 · 2012 · Reported
19
citing judgments

The market value of power captively consumed should be computed based on the rate at which power is supplied to a consumer in the open market, not the rate at which it could be sold to State Electricity Boards.

Srikakollu Subba Rao & Co. and Ors. v. Union of India and Other
173 ITR 708 · 1988 · High Court
19
citing judgments

For the provisions of Section 43B to apply, not only must a liability to pay tax or duty be incurred in the accounting year, but the amount must also be statutorily "payable" in that year. A deduction is allowable for liabilities that have accrued but not yet become payable under the relevant law.

CIT v. Pandavapura Sahakara Sakkare Karkhane Ltd.
174 ITR 475 · 1998 · High Court
19
citing judgments

Contributions made by a co-operative society for the education of employees' children are deductible as expenditure.

CIT v. A. Mohammed Mohideen
176 ITR 393 · 1989 · High Court
19
citing judgments

Developing land into housing plots with the aim of achieving a better price does not automatically convert the transaction into business income; it can be considered the realization of a capital investment or the conversion of one form of asset into another.

Tirunelveli Motor Bus Service Co. P Ltd. v. CIT
188 CTR 572 · High Court
19
citing judgments

A provision for gratuity written back is includable in business income when the corresponding expenditure was allowed as a deduction.

Chinai & Co. (P.) Ltd. v. CIT
206 ITR 616 · 1994 · High Court
19
citing judgments

Expenses incurred by a company solely to maintain its status as a company are allowable as deductions. However, the core principle is that expenses incurred for earning income are direct expenses and must be allowed in full.

Bastiram Narayandas v. CIT
210 ITR 438 · 1994 · High Court
19
citing judgments

The rejection of account books and subsequent best judgment assessment is justified when an assessee fails to produce relevant records, such as daily manufacturing quantities and raw material consumption, indicating that the accounts do not reflect a true and correct state of affairs.

CIT v. Indian Oxyge Ltd.
218 ITR 337 · 1996 · Supreme Court
19
citing judgments

Payments for the use of technical information, processes, or inventions under an agreement that prohibits disclosure after termination and is terminable before its specified period constitute revenue expenditure, not the acquisition of a capital asset.

141/228 Taxman 340 Bihar State Warehousing Corpn. Ltd. v. CIT
224 Taxmann 12 · 2011 · High Court
19
citing judgments

The disallowance of employee share of Provident Fund (PF) contributions is addressed by amendments made to Sections 36(1)(va) and 43B of the Income Tax Act by the Finance Act, 2021, which inserted Explanation 2 to Section 36(1)(va).

Indian Molasses Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT
229 ITR 366 · 1998 · High Court
19
citing judgments

A contingent liability, which is not an ascertained liability in praesenti, cannot be allowed as a deduction under the Income-tax Act.

CIT v. Walfort Share & Stockbrokers (P) Ltd.
233 CTR 42 · 2010 · Supreme Court
19
citing judgments

Disallowance of expenditure under Section 14A requires a proximate cause establishing the relationship between the expenditure and the exempt income. The expenditure must have a real, dominant, and immediate relationship with income not forming part of the total income.

CIT v. Wavin (India) Ltd.
236 ITR 314 · 1996 · Supreme Court
19
citing judgments

Payments made for the limited right to use technical information or know-how, where there is no sale of such information, are allowable as revenue deductions.

CIT v. Bharat Commerce and Industries Ltd.
240 ITR 256 · 1999 · High Court
19
citing judgments

An assessee can change its method of valuing closing stock if the change is bona fide and consistently followed thereafter. A change in valuation method is permissible even if it was not permissible in earlier years.

National Leather Cloth Manufacturing Co. v. Indian Council of Agricultural Research
241 ITR 482 · 2000 · High Court
19
citing judgments

A taxpayer is entitled to a deduction under section 35(1)(ii) for donations made to an institution if the certificate granted by the prescribed authority was valid at the time of donation, even if that certificate is later retrospectively withdrawn or cancelled.

CIT v. Gujarat Carbon Ltd.
254 ITR 294 · 2002 · High Court
19
citing judgments

Payments made under an agreement that are directly related to services in the revenue field are allowable as revenue expenditure, not capital expenditure.

CIT vs. Sugauli Sugar Mills (1989) 236 ITR 518(SC), CIT v. Kesaria Tea Co. Ltd.
257 ITR 343 · 2002 · Supreme Court
19
citing judgments

For income to be considered as having ceased to be payable and brought to tax under Section 41(1), it is not sufficient that the claim for repayment has become barred by limitation; there must be a release or write-off of the debt by the creditor in favour of the assessee.

CIT v. Ignifluid Boilers (I) Ltd.
283 ITR 295 · 2006 · High Court
19
citing judgments

Retention money is considered deferred payment and is not taxable in the year it is retained if it is contingent upon the satisfactory completion of the contract work and the assessee has no vested right to receive it.

Bigjos India Limited v. CIT
293 ITR 170 · 2007 · High Court
19
citing judgments
Addanki Narayanappa v. Bhaskara Krishnappa
3 SCR 400 · 1966 · Supreme Court
19
citing judgments

Property brought into a partnership by a partner becomes the property of the firm, and the partner is entitled to their share of profits from its realization or its value upon dissolution. Once property enters the partnership capital, the partner's right is abridged, not the full original right.

CIT v. Federal Bank
301 ITR 188 · 2008 · High Court
19
citing judgments

Interest on securities becomes due and receivable only upon maturity and cannot be taxed prior to maturity. The entitlement to interest arises only at that point.

Schneider Electric (Ind.) Ltd. v. CIT (21008)
304 ITR 360 · 2008 · High Court
19
citing judgments

Commission paid to agents for services rendered is not deductible if the assessee fails to provide evidence that the agents actually procured sale orders or rendered services justifying the commission.

6.8 In Commissioner of Income Tax v. Moonlight Builders and Developers
307 ITR 197 · 2008 · High Court
19
citing judgments

The rule of consistency dictates that a position adopted by the revenue in a prior year should not be allowed to be changed in a subsequent year, especially when it relates to the allowability of expenses or other tax treatment.

Arthur Anderson & Co. v. ACIT
324 ITR 240 · 2010 · High Court
19
citing judgments

Allowing deduction of interest paid by the assessee as business expenditure u/s.37(1) of the Act is not permissible when netting off interest received against interest paid.

Kannur District Cooperative Bank v. CIT
365 ITR 343 · 2014 · High Court
19
citing judgments

Cooperative banks are eligible to claim deduction under both limbs of Section 36(1)(viia) for all types of loans and advances extended by their rural branches.

PCIT v. Surya Merchands Ltd.
387 ITR 105 · 2016 · High Court
19
citing judgments

The requirement to furnish an audit report along with the return of income under Section 80IA(7) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is directory and not mandatory, and will be satisfied if the report is filed during the assessment proceedings.

CIT v. Abdullabhai Abdulkadar
41 ITR 545 · 1961 · Supreme Court
19
citing judgments

Advances given in the normal course of business that become irrecoverable and are written off can be allowed as a business loss. A debt must arise out of and as an incident to the trade to be allowable as a deduction.

Hoshiarpur Electric Supply Co. v. CIT
41 ITR 608 · 1961 · Supreme Court
19
citing judgments

Receipts for bringing into existence capital of lasting value, such as service connection charges for installing capital equipment, are considered capital receipts, not incidental to business operations.

CIT v. Ashok J. Patel
43 Taxmann.com 227 · 2014 · High Court
19
citing judgments

The Assessing Officer has the onus to prove that payments made to related parties under section 40A(2)(b) are excessive, by providing comparable market prices and demonstrating the unreasonableness of the payment.

PCIT v. Envestor Venture Ltd.
431 ITR 221 · 2021 · High Court
19
citing judgments

Disallowance of expenditure under Section 14A, read with Rule 8D, must be computed based on expenditure directly relatable to earning exempted income. The assessing authority must record satisfaction for such disallowance.

Rassi Cement Ltd. v. ITO
45 ITD 233 · 1993 · ITAT
19
citing judgments

Contributions to a trust are deductible if the trust deed clearly benefits employees and the contribution is for employee welfare and required by an industrial agreement, aligning with the legislature's intent for Section 40A(9).

West Cost Paper Mills (P.)\nLtd v. CIT
52 Taxmann.com 268 · 2014 · ITAT
19
citing judgments

The ITAT Mumbai, in the case of West Coast Paper Mills (P.) Ltd. v. CIT, concurred with the findings of the CIT(A) concerning deductions under Section 80IA.

State of Madras v. G.J. Coelho
53 ITR 186 · 1964 · Supreme Court
19
citing judgments

Interest on borrowed funds used to acquire a capital asset is deductible as revenue expenditure if the acquisition is an integral part of the business. Expenditure closely related to business can be viewed as an integral part of its conduct and thus deductible as revenue expenditure.

Binani Cement Ltd. v. CIT
60 Taxmann.com 384 · 2015 · High Court
19
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred on the construction or acquisition of a new facility that is subsequently abandoned while still in the work-in-progress stage is allowable as a deduction in the year of write-off, provided it was incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the assessee's business.

Kishor Mohanlal Teliwala v. ACIT
64 TTJ 543 · ITAT
19
citing judgments

When undisclosed income from 'on money' in property transactions is assessed under Section 158BC, the addition should be a reasonable profit earned on the unaccounted turnover, with an 8% profit rate considered reasonable by the ITAT.

New Mangalore Port Trust v. ACIT, Circle-1(1), Mangalore
65 Taxmann.com 210 · 2016 · Reported
19
citing judgments

An upfront premium received for a concession or lease agreement, which is non-refundable even upon premature termination, is considered a revenue receipt for tax purposes.

Durga Prasad Khanna v. CIT
72 ITR 796 · 1969 · Supreme Court
19
citing judgments

A payment of salami or premium is not a revenue receipt but a capital receipt, and departmental authorities and courts err in treating it as an advance rent.

Torrent Financier's v. Asstt. CIT
73 TTJ 624 · 2001 · ITAT
19
citing judgments

No disallowance can be made if interest-free funds available with the assessee exceed the interest-free advances given.

Patil Engineering Ltd. v. DCIT
84 TTJ 666 · ITAT
19
citing judgments

The decision in Patil Engineering Ltd. v. DCIT (84 TTJ 666) held that a developer was eligible for deduction under Section 80-IA(4). However, this ruling was later overruled by the Mumbai Tribunal.

Pragathi Grameena Bank Ltd. v. CIT
91 Taxmann.com 343 · 2018 · High Court
19
citing judgments

Where a provision made for a Non-Performing Asset (NPA) is no longer required, its reversal is to be charged under Section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act as a remission or cessation of liability. This principle applies when an NPA begins performing again.

Delhi Flour Mills v. CIT
95 ITR 151 · 1974 · High Court
19
citing judgments

A provision for a business liability that has definitely arisen in the accounting year, even if discharged later, is allowable as a deduction if it can be reasonably estimated. This applies to ascertained liabilities crystallized with reasonable certainty, such as interest obligations arising from a contract.

Natesan Krishnamurty v. ITO
103 Taxmann.com 342 · 2019 · High Court
19
citing judgments

The exception under Rule 6DD(j) to the disallowance under Section 40A(3) for payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 cannot be invoked if the genuineness of the expenses is doubtful, especially when they are unrecorded in the books.

India Motor Parts And Accessories (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
60 ITR 531 · 1966 · High Court
19
citing judgments

Valuing slow-moving and obsolescent stock at a price below cost is a recognized accounting method that can be followed in India.

Resolve Salvage & Fire India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT
139 Taxmann.com 196 · 2022 · ITAT
19
citing judgments

Interest paid on delayed payment of TDS is an allowable deduction under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, as it is compensatory in nature.

PCIT v. Future First Info Services (P) Ltd.
447 ITR 299 · 2022 · High Court
19
citing judgments

Disallowance under section 40A(2)(b) for remuneration paid to a director is unsustainable if the revenue fails to provide cogent reasons or market comparisons to prove it's not commensurate with services rendered, especially if accepted in subsequent years.