141/228 Taxman 340 Bihar State Warehousing Corpn. Ltd. v. CIT

224 Taxmann 12High Court2011#6118 most cited
19

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2022.

Also reported as

368 ITR 410

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing 141/228 Taxman 340 Bihar State Warehousing Corpn. Ltd. v. CIT

M/S. SURESH ELECTRICALS,BELLARY vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 724/BANG/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Nov 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevanassessment Year : 2018-19 M/S. Suresh Electricals, Vs. Dcit, Ward No.25, Cmc T. S. No.227, Tilak Cpc, Nagar, Khb Colony, Bengaluru. Bellary – 583 101. Pan : Abyfs 9751 M Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. B. S. Balachandran, Advocate Revenue By : Shri. Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel Date Of Hearing : 23.11.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 24.11.2022 O R D E R This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of Nfac, Delhi, Dated 12.07.2022, Relating To Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. The Only Issue That Arises For Consideration In This Appeal Is As To Whether The Revenue Authorities Were Justified In Disallowing Payment Made To Esi/Pf Being Employees’ Share Of Contribution Under Section 36(1)(Va) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Called ‘The Act’). 3. In This Regard, It Is Pertinent To Note That The Employee Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Was Promulgated To Provide For Such Institution Of Provident Funds, Pension Fund & Deposit-Linked Insurance Fund For Employees In Factories & Other Establishments. It Aims To Build Adequate Retirement Corpus For The Salaried Class Of Employees. The Fund Includes Contributions From The Employer & Employee Both, Page 2 Of 14

For Appellant: Shri. B. S. Balachandran, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel
Section 2Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)

…xmann.com 160 (Punj & Har.) CIT v. Ghatge Patil Page 8 of 14 Transports Ltd. [2014] 368 ITR 749/[2015] 53 taxmann.com 141/228 Taxman 340 Bihar State Warehousing Corpn. Ltd. vs. CIT [2016] 368 ITR 410 (Patna) CIT vs. Vijay Shree Ltd. [2014] 43 taxmann.com 396/224 Taxmann 12 (Cal.) (Mag.) CIT v. Industrial Security & Intelligence India Pvt. Ltd. [Tax Case (Appeal) Nos. 585 and 586 of 2015 & M.P. No. 1 of 2015, dated 24.7.2015 Gauhati High Court in the case of CIT vs. George Williamson (Assam) Ltd. [2006] 284 ITR 619 (Gauhati). 14. In so far as the disallowance of employee share of PF is concerned, the CIT(A) refer…

BHORUKA FABCONS PRIVATE LIMITED,MYSURU vs. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 910/BANG/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Nov 2022AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevanassessment Year : 2020-21 M/S. Bhoruka Fabcons Pvt. Ltd., Vs. The Assistant Director Of Income Tax, No.427E, Hebbal Industrial Area, Cpc, Mysuru – 570 016. Bengaluru. Pan : Aaccb 9377 N Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Bhargava S. N, Ca Revenue By : Shri. Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel Date Of Hearing : 23.11.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 24.11.2022 O R D E R This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of Nfac, Delhi, Dated 28.07.2022, Relating To Assessment Year 2020-21. 2. The Only Issue That Arises For Consideration In This Appeal Is As To Whether The Revenue Authorities Were Justified In Disallowing Payment Made To Esi/Pf Being Employees’ Share Of Contribution Under Section 36(1)(Va) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Called ‘The Act’). 3. In This Regard, It Is Pertinent To Note That The Employee Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Was Promulgated To Provide For Such Institution Of Provident Funds, Pension Fund & Deposit-Linked Insurance Fund For Employees In Factories & Other Establishments. It Aims To Build Adequate Retirement Corpus For The Salaried Class Of Employees. The Fund Includes Contributions From The Employer & Employee Both, Calculated In The Prescribed Manner Under The Relevant Act. As Per Page 2 Of 13

For Appellant: Shri. Bhargava S. N, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel
Section 2Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)

…xman 207/37 taxmann.com 160 (Punj & Har.) CIT v. Ghatge Patil Transports Ltd. [2014] 368 ITR 749/[2015] 53 taxmann.com 141/228 Taxman 340 Bihar State Warehousing Corpn. Ltd. vs. CIT [2016] 368 ITR 410 (Patna) CIT vs. Vijay Shree Ltd. [2014] 43 taxmann.com 396/224 Taxmann 12 (Cal.) (Mag.) CIT v. Industrial Security & Intelligence India Pvt. Ltd. [Tax Case (Appeal) Nos. 585 and 586 of 2015 & M.P. No. 1 of 2015, dated 24.7.2015 Gauhati High Court in Page 8 of 13 the case of CIT vs. George Williamson (Assam) Ltd. [2006] 284 ITR 619 (Gauhati). 14. In so far as the disallowance of employee share of PF is concerned, th…

CHASE SECURITY,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(3)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 796/BANG/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Nov 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevanassessment Year : 2018-19 M/S. Chase Security, Vs. The Ito, No.16/A, 1St Floor, Millar Tank Bund Ward – 6(3)(1), Cpc, Road, Vasanth Nagar, Bengaluru. Bengaluru – 560 052. Pan : Aaefc 2412 L Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Smt. Sheethal Borkar, Advocate Revenue By : Shri. Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel Date Of Hearing : 21.11.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 23.11.2022 O R D E R This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Dated 29.04.2021 By The Nfac, Delhi Relating To Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. The Only Issue That Arises For Consideration In This Appeal Is As To Whether The Revenue Authorities Were Justified In Disallowing Payment Made To Esi/Pf Being Employees’ Share Of Contribution Under Section 36(1)(Va) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Called ‘The Act’). 3. In This Regard, It Is Pertinent To Note That The Employee Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Was Promulgated To Provide For Such Institution Of Provident Funds, Pension Fund & Deposit-Linked Insurance Fund For Employees In Factories & Other Establishments. It Aims To Build Adequate Retirement Corpus For The Salaried Class Of Employees. The Fund Includes Contributions From The Employer & Employee Both, Page 2 Of 14

For Appellant: Smt. Sheethal Borkar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel
Section 2Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)

…xmann.com 160 (Punj & Har.) CIT v. Ghatge Patil Page 8 of 14 Transports Ltd. [2014] 368 ITR 749/[2015] 53 taxmann.com 141/228 Taxman 340 Bihar State Warehousing Corpn. Ltd. vs. CIT [2016] 368 ITR 410 (Patna) CIT vs. Vijay Shree Ltd. [2014] 43 taxmann.com 396/224 Taxmann 12 (Cal.) (Mag.) CIT v. Industrial Security & Intelligence India Pvt. Ltd. [Tax Case (Appeal) Nos. 585 and 586 of 2015 & M.P. No. 1 of 2015, dated 24.7.2015 Gauhati High Court in the case of CIT vs. George Williamson (Assam) Ltd. [2006] 284 ITR 619 (Gauhati). 14. In so far as the disallowance of employee share of PF is concerned, the CIT(A) refer…

SRG EARTH RESOURCES PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. PCIT-2, KOLKATA

In the result, grounds raised by the assessee company are allowed and accordingly the appeal of the assessee is allowed as aforesaid

ITA 165/KOL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Sept 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2017-18 Srg Earth Resources Acit, Circle-5(1), Private Limited Kolkata 16, Ganesh Chandra Vs. Avenue, Gandhi House, Dalhousie, Kolkata – 700013. Pan: Aajcs2276A (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Appellant By : Shri S.S. Gupta, Ar Respondent By : Md. Ghayas Uddin, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing : 13.07.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 28.09.2022 O R D E R Per Sonjoy Sarma: This Appeal Is Directed Against The Order Passed U/S 263 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’), By The Ld. Pcit, Kolkata-2 For A.Y. 2017-18 Vide Order Dated 17.10.2019. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Company Is Engaged In The Business Of Work Contracts Of Various Steel Plant. The Assessee- Company Filed Its Return Of Income On 31.10.2017 Declaring Total Income Of Rs. 2,30,49,880/-. The Case Of The Assessee-Company Was Selected For Scrutiny Through Cass & The Statutory Notices U/S 143(2) & 142(1) Of The Act Were Issued & Duly Served Upon The Assessee-Company In Response To Which Compliance Letters, Submissions & Copies Of Relevant Documents Were Furnished By The Assessee-Company.

For Appellant: Shri S.S. Gupta, ARFor Respondent: MD. Ghayas Uddin, CIT(DR)
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA BENCH “A”, KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2017-18 SRG EARTH RESOURCES ACIT, CIRCLE-5(1), PRIVATE LIMITED Kolkata 16, Ganesh Chandra Vs. Avenue, Gandhi House, Dalhousie, Kolkata – 700013. PAN: AAJCS2276A (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Appellant by : Shri S.S. Gupta, AR Respondent by : MD. Ghayas Uddin, CIT(DR) Date of Hearing : 13.07.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 28.09.2022 O R D E R PER SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal is directed against the order passed u/s 263 of the Inco…

SRG EARTH RESOURCES PVT LTD,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR. 5(1), KOLKATA

In the result, grounds raised by the assessee company are allowed and accordingly the appeal of the assessee is allowed as aforesaid

ITA 95/KOL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Feb 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2016-17 Srg Earth Resources Acit, Circle-5(1), Private Limited Kolkata 16, Ganesh Chandra Vs. Avenue, Gandhi House, Dalhousie, Kolkata – 700013. Pan: Aajcs2276A (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Appellant By : Shri S.S. Gupta, Ar Respondent By : Md. Ghayas Uddin, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing : 09.02.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 24.02.2022 O R D E R Per Girish Agrawal: This Appeal Is Directed Against The Order Passed U/S 263 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’), By The Ld. Pcit, Kolkata-2 For A.Y. 2016-17 Vide Order Dated 22.02.2021. 2. Facts Briefly Stated As Culled Out From The Records Are That The Assessee Company Is Engaged In The Business Of Operation & Maintenance Of Coke Oven Plant For Various Steel Manufacturing Companies. The Assessee Company Filed Its Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2016-17 On 08.10.2016 Declaring Total Income Of Rs. 1,46,03,550/-. The Case Of The Assessee Company Was Selected For Scrutiny Through Cass & Statutory Notices U/S 143(2) & 142(1) Of The Act Were Issued & Duly Served Upon The Assessee Company In Response To Which Compliance Letters, Submissions & Copies Of 2 Srg Earth Resources Private Limited A.Y. 2016-17 Relevant Documents Were Furnished By The Assessee Company. Assessment Order U/S 143(3) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (The Act) Was Passed On 14.12.2018 Determining Total Income At Rs. 1,47,86,650/-.

For Appellant: Shri S.S. Gupta, ARFor Respondent: MD. Ghayas Uddin, CIT(DR)
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA BENCH “A”, KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, VICE-PRESIDENT AND SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2016-17 SRG EARTH RESOURCES ACIT, CIRCLE-5(1), PRIVATE LIMITED Kolkata 16, Ganesh Chandra Vs. Avenue, Gandhi House, Dalhousie, Kolkata – 700013. PAN: AAJCS2276A (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Appellant by : Shri S.S. Gupta, AR Respondent by : MD. Ghayas Uddin, CIT(DR) Date of Hearing : 09.02.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 24.02.2022 O R D E R PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: This appeal is directed against the order passed u/s 263 of the…

ACIT, CIRCLE - 1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. MCNALLY SAYAJI ENGINEERING LIMITED, KOLKATA

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 1173/KOL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Jan 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri P.M.Jagtap, Vice- & Shri S.S.Godaraassessment Year:2013-14 Acit, Circle-1(1), P- M/S Mcnally Sayajt बनाम 7,Chowringhee Square, Engineering Ltd., 4, / R.No.20, 7Thfloor, V/S. Mangoe Lane, Kolkat-A7A00 069 Kolkata-700 001 [Pan No.Aaccs 5491 A] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent Shri Ram Bilash Meena, Cit-Dr अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri Aplesh Gupta, Aca ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 07-01-2020 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 17-01-2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S.Godara:- This Revenue’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2013-14 Arises Against The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, Kolkata Dated 13.03.2018, Passed In Case No.10199/Cit(A)-1/Circle-1(1)/2016-17, Involving Proceedings U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; In Short ‘The Act’ Heard Both The Parties. Case File Perused. 2. The Revenue’S Former Substantive Ground Pleads That The Cit(A) Has Erred In Law & On Facts In Deleting The Employees Contribution To Provident Fund Disallowance Of ₹20,38,637/- Despite The Fact That The Same Had Been Deposited After The Due Date As Per The Specific Provision In The Corresponding Statue. It Fails To Dispute That The Assessee’S Impugned Credit Had Been Made Very Well Before The Date Of Filing Return & Therefore, This Disallowance Made U/S. 36(1)(Va) R.W.S. 43B Of The Act Is Not Sustainable As Per Hon'Ble Jurisdictional High Court’S Decision In Cit Vs. M/S Vijay

Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(va)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH “A” KOLKATA Before Shri P.M.Jagtap, Vice-President and Shri S.S.Godara, Judicial Member Assessment Year:2013-14 ACIT, Circle-1(1), P- M/s McNally Sayajt बनाम 7,Chowringhee Square, Engineering Ltd., 4, / R.No.20, 7thFloor, V/s. Mangoe Lane, Kolkat-a7a00 069 Kolkata-700 001 [PAN No.AACCS 5491 A] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent Shri Ram Bilash Meena, CIT-DR अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri Aplesh Gupta, ACA ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 07-01-2020 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 17-01-2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R PER S.S.Godara…

JAMES SCARIA KOCHUPUTHENPARAMPIL,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CIR20(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 7264/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Jun 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singhmr. James Scaria Kochuputheparampil Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of (Prop. J & J Tours & Travels), Income Tax, Circle-20(1), B/7, Sai Ashish, Mahakali Caves Road, C-13, Pratyakshakar Bhavan, Andheri (E), Mumbai 400 093 Bkc, Mumbai – 51. Pan:Aaypk 4258 M Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By None Respondent By Shri Somanath S. Ukkali, Dr Date Of Hearing 21-06-16 Date Of Pronouncement 21-06-2016 O R D E R Per Mahavir Singh, Jm: This Appeal By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of The Cit (A)-31, Mumbai Passed In Appeal No.Cit (A)-31/It-127/Acit-20(1)/12-13 Dated 25-09-2014. Assessment Was Framed By The Acit, Circle- 20(1), Mumbai For Assessment Year 2010- 11 Vide His Order Dated 08-11-2012 U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”).

Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER Mr. James Scaria Kochuputheparampil Vs. The Asst. Commissioner of (Prop. J & J Tours & Travels), Income Tax, Circle-20(1), B/7, Sai Ashish, Mahakali Caves Road, C-13, Pratyakshakar Bhavan, Andheri (E), Mumbai 400 093 BKC, Mumbai – 51. PAN:AAYPK 4258 M Appellant .. Respondent Appellant by None Respondent by Shri Somanath S. Ukkali, DR Date of hearing 21-06-16 Date of pronouncement 21-06-2016 O R D E R PER MAHAVIR SINGH, JM: This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of the CIT (A)-31, Mumbai passed in…