D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-12, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S MICROSEC FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD., KOLKATA
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue (on Ground No
ITA 2779/KOL/2013[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Jan 2017AY 2009-2010
Bench: Shri A.T.Varkey, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2779/Kol/2013 ("नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year:2009-2010) Dcit, Circle-12, Vs. M/S Microsec Financial P-7, Chowringhee Square, Services Ltd., Aayakar Bhawan, 7Th Floor, Shivam Chambers, 53, Kolkata-69 Sayed Amir Ali Avenue, Kolkata-700019 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aadcs 7147 N .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) Revenue By : Shri Rajat Kumar Kureel, Jcit Sr.Dr Assessee By : Shri D.S.Damle, Advocate सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 21/12/2016 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement 04/01/2017 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am: The Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To Assessment Year 2009-2010, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-Xii, Kolkata, In Appeal No.212/Xii/12/11-12, Dated 23.09.2013, Which In Turn Arises Out Of An Order Passed By The Assessing Officer (Ao) Under Section 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act 1961, (In Short The ‘Act’), Dated 16.11.2011. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Qua The Assessee Are That The Assessee Is A Non-Banking Financial Company, Filed Its Original Return Of Income On 21.09.2009 Declaring Total Income Of Rs.1,46,66,807/- & Revised Return Of Income On 19.10.2009 Declaring Total Income Of Rs.1,98,36,700/-. Thereafter The Case Of The Assessee Was Selected For Scrutiny & The Ao Framed The Assessment U/S.143(3) By Making Various Disallowances.
For Appellant: Shri D.S.Damle, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Kumar Kureel, JCIT Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 14A
…921 of 2006 decided on 16th October 2008, in our opinion, no fault can be found with the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in allowing the aborted share issue expenditure under section 37 of the Income Tax Act,1961.” (ii) Binani Cement Ltd.[2015] 60 Taxmann.com 384 (Calcutta): “11Following the judgment in the case of A.Gajapathi Naidu (supra) the question to be asked is when did the expenditure claimed by way of deduction arise? There would have been no occasion to claim the deduction if the work-in- progress had completed its course. Because the project was abandoned the work-in-progress did not pr…