Natesan Krishnamurty v. ITO

103 Taxmann.com 342High Court2019#6153 most cited

What is Natesan Krishnamurty v. ITO authority for?

The exception under Rule 6DD(j) to the disallowance under Section 40A(3) for payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 cannot be invoked if the genuineness of the expenses is doubtful, especially when they are unrecorded in the books.

19

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,315 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Natesan Krishnamurty · 40A(3) · Rule 6DD(j) · genuineness of expenses · unrecorded expenses · cash payments · Section 40A · violation of Rule 6DD

Also reported as

167 Taxmann 58

Sections most often in play

Section 119Section 132(1)Section 143(3)Section 144ASection 153ASection 153CSection 153DSection 158BG

Issues it is cited on

section 153(a)violation of natural justicesection 132(4a)section 40a(3)section 132(1)section 153a(1)section 145(3)section 40asearch assessmentsection 153drule 46asection 145

Judgments citing Natesan Krishnamurty v. ITO

Ramji Vaish, Allahabad vs. DCIT(CC), Allahabad

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

ITA 38/ALLD/2023[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Oct 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.A. & Sh. SuyashFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR & Sh
Section 132(1)Section 153Section 153ASection 153DSection 250

…appreciating that in absence of any cogent material, the existence of exceptional circumstances beyond control of payer for application of rule 6DD(j) could not be said to be established in view of the ratio of decisions in case of Natesan Krishnamurty Vs ITO 103 Taxmann.com 342(Mad), Jhunjhunwala & Co Vs CIT 167 Taxman 58(Delhi), CIT Vs Singamshetty Subba Rao 357 ITR 529(A.P.), Pawar Patkar Constructions 159 ITD 406(Pune Trib). 6. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in holding that the payments in excess of Rs. 20,000 in violation 40A(3) were covered by exception within Rule 6…

Ramji Vaish, Allahabad vs. DCIT, (CC), Allahabad

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

ITA 37/ALLD/2023[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Oct 2025AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.A. & Sh. SuyashFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR & Sh
Section 132(1)Section 153Section 153ASection 153DSection 250

…appreciating that in absence of any cogent material, the existence of exceptional circumstances beyond control of payer for application of rule 6DD(j) could not be said to be established in view of the ratio of decisions in case of Natesan Krishnamurty Vs ITO 103 Taxmann.com 342(Mad), Jhunjhunwala & Co Vs CIT 167 Taxman 58(Delhi), CIT Vs Singamshetty Subba Rao 357 ITR 529(A.P.), Pawar Patkar Constructions 159 ITD 406(Pune Trib). 6. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in holding that the payments in excess of Rs. 20,000 in violation 40A(3) were covered by exception within Rule 6…

Ramji Vaish, Allahabad vs. DCIT, (CC), Allahabad

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

ITA 36/ALLD/2023[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Oct 2025AY 2005-06

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.A. & Sh. SuyashFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR & Sh
Section 132(1)Section 153Section 153ASection 153DSection 250

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD BEFORE SH. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.36, 37, 38, 101, 125, 126, 127/ALLD/2023 A.Ys. 2005-06 to 2011-12 Ramji Vaish, vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income 86, New Bairahana, Allahabad Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad PAN: AAKPV7963M (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA Nos. 105, 106, 107, 108/ALLD/2019 A.Ys. 2005-06, 2011-12, 2008-09 & 2010-11 M/s Subhash Stone Product (P.) vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Ltd., Subhash Nagar, Bari Dalla, Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad Sonebhadra PAN: AAICS3246F (A…

Ramji Vaish, Allahabad vs. DCIT(CC), Allahabad

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

ITA 127/ALLD/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Oct 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.A. & Sh. SuyashFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR & Sh
Section 132(1)Section 153Section 153ASection 153DSection 250

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD BEFORE SH. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.36, 37, 38, 101, 125, 126, 127/ALLD/2023 A.Ys. 2005-06 to 2011-12 Ramji Vaish, vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income 86, New Bairahana, Allahabad Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad PAN: AAKPV7963M (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA Nos. 105, 106, 107, 108/ALLD/2019 A.Ys. 2005-06, 2011-12, 2008-09 & 2010-11 M/s Subhash Stone Product (P.) vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Ltd., Subhash Nagar, Bari Dalla, Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad Sonebhadra PAN: AAICS3246F (A…

Ramji Vaish, Allahabad vs. DCIT(CC), Allahabad

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

ITA 126/ALLD/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Oct 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.A. & Sh. SuyashFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR & Sh
Section 132(1)Section 153Section 153ASection 153DSection 250

…appreciating that in absence of any cogent material, the existence of exceptional circumstances beyond control of payer for application of rule 6DD(j) could not be said to be established in view of the ratio of decisions in case of Natesan Krishnamurty Vs ITO 103 Taxmann.com 342(Mad), Jhunjhunwala & Co Vs CIT 167 Taxman 58(Delhi), CIT Vs Singamshetty Subba Rao 357 ITR 529(A.P.), Pawar Patkar Constructions 159 ITD 406(Pune Trib). 6. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in holding that the payments in excess of Rs. 20,000 in violation 40A(3) were covered by exception within Rule 6…

Ramji Vaish, Allahabad vs. DCIT(CC), Allahabad

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

ITA 125/ALLD/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Oct 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.A. & Sh. SuyashFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR & Sh
Section 132(1)Section 153Section 153ASection 153DSection 250

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD BEFORE SH. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.36, 37, 38, 101, 125, 126, 127/ALLD/2023 A.Ys. 2005-06 to 2011-12 Ramji Vaish, vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income 86, New Bairahana, Allahabad Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad PAN: AAKPV7963M (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA Nos. 105, 106, 107, 108/ALLD/2019 A.Ys. 2005-06, 2011-12, 2008-09 & 2010-11 M/s Subhash Stone Product (P.) vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Ltd., Subhash Nagar, Bari Dalla, Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad Sonebhadra PAN: AAICS3246F (A…

Ramji Vaish, Allahabad vs. DCIT(C.C.), Allahabad

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

ITA 101/ALLD/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Oct 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.A. & Sh. SuyashFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR & Sh
Section 132(1)Section 153Section 153ASection 153DSection 250

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD BEFORE SH. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.36, 37, 38, 101, 125, 126, 127/ALLD/2023 A.Ys. 2005-06 to 2011-12 Ramji Vaish, vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income 86, New Bairahana, Allahabad Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad PAN: AAKPV7963M (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA Nos. 105, 106, 107, 108/ALLD/2019 A.Ys. 2005-06, 2011-12, 2008-09 & 2010-11 M/s Subhash Stone Product (P.) vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Ltd., Subhash Nagar, Bari Dalla, Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad Sonebhadra PAN: AAICS3246F (A…

Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad vs. Vijay Stone Product, Sonebhadra

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

ITA 65/ALLD/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Oct 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.A. & Sh. SuyashFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR & Sh
Section 132(1)Section 153Section 153ASection 153DSection 250

…appreciating that in absence of any cogent material, the existence of exceptional circumstances beyond control of payer for application of rule 6DD(j) could not be said to be established in view of the ratio of decisions in case of Natesan Krishnamurty Vs ITO 103 Taxmann.com 342(Mad), Jhunjhunwala & Co Vs CIT 167 Taxman 58(Delhi), CIT Vs Singamshetty Subba Rao 357 ITR 529(A.P.), Pawar Patkar Constructions 159 ITD 406(Pune Trib). 6. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in holding that the payments in excess of Rs. 20,000 in violation 40A(3) were covered by exception within Rule 6…

Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle, Allahabad vs. Vijay Stone Products, Sonebhadra

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

ITA 64/ALLD/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Oct 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.A. & Sh. SuyashFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR & Sh
Section 132(1)Section 153Section 153ASection 153DSection 250

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD BEFORE SH. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.36, 37, 38, 101, 125, 126, 127/ALLD/2023 A.Ys. 2005-06 to 2011-12 Ramji Vaish, vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income 86, New Bairahana, Allahabad Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad PAN: AAKPV7963M (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA Nos. 105, 106, 107, 108/ALLD/2019 A.Ys. 2005-06, 2011-12, 2008-09 & 2010-11 M/s Subhash Stone Product (P.) vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Ltd., Subhash Nagar, Bari Dalla, Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad Sonebhadra PAN: AAICS3246F (A…

Vijay Stone Product, Sonebhadra vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

ITA 33/ALLD/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Oct 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.A. & Sh. SuyashFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR & Sh
Section 132(1)Section 153Section 153ASection 153DSection 250

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD BEFORE SH. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.36, 37, 38, 101, 125, 126, 127/ALLD/2023 A.Ys. 2005-06 to 2011-12 Ramji Vaish, vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income 86, New Bairahana, Allahabad Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad PAN: AAKPV7963M (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA Nos. 105, 106, 107, 108/ALLD/2019 A.Ys. 2005-06, 2011-12, 2008-09 & 2010-11 M/s Subhash Stone Product (P.) vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Ltd., Subhash Nagar, Bari Dalla, Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad Sonebhadra PAN: AAICS3246F (A…

Vijay Stone Product, Sonebhadra vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

ITA 32/ALLD/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Oct 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.A. & Sh. SuyashFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR & Sh
Section 132(1)Section 153Section 153ASection 153DSection 250

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD BEFORE SH. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.36, 37, 38, 101, 125, 126, 127/ALLD/2023 A.Ys. 2005-06 to 2011-12 Ramji Vaish, vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income 86, New Bairahana, Allahabad Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad PAN: AAKPV7963M (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA Nos. 105, 106, 107, 108/ALLD/2019 A.Ys. 2005-06, 2011-12, 2008-09 & 2010-11 M/s Subhash Stone Product (P.) vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Ltd., Subhash Nagar, Bari Dalla, Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad Sonebhadra PAN: AAICS3246F (A…

Vijay Stone Product, Sonebhadra vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

ITA 31/ALLD/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Oct 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.A. & Sh. SuyashFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR & Sh
Section 132(1)Section 153Section 153ASection 153DSection 250

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD BEFORE SH. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.36, 37, 38, 101, 125, 126, 127/ALLD/2023 A.Ys. 2005-06 to 2011-12 Ramji Vaish, vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income 86, New Bairahana, Allahabad Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad PAN: AAKPV7963M (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA Nos. 105, 106, 107, 108/ALLD/2019 A.Ys. 2005-06, 2011-12, 2008-09 & 2010-11 M/s Subhash Stone Product (P.) vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Ltd., Subhash Nagar, Bari Dalla, Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad Sonebhadra PAN: AAICS3246F (A…

Vijay Stone Product, Sonebhadra vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

ITA 30/ALLD/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Oct 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.A. & Sh. SuyashFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR & Sh
Section 132(1)Section 153Section 153ASection 153DSection 250

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD BEFORE SH. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.36, 37, 38, 101, 125, 126, 127/ALLD/2023 A.Ys. 2005-06 to 2011-12 Ramji Vaish, vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income 86, New Bairahana, Allahabad Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad PAN: AAKPV7963M (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA Nos. 105, 106, 107, 108/ALLD/2019 A.Ys. 2005-06, 2011-12, 2008-09 & 2010-11 M/s Subhash Stone Product (P.) vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Ltd., Subhash Nagar, Bari Dalla, Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad Sonebhadra PAN: AAICS3246F (A…

M/S Jai Maa Sharda Service Station, Allahabad vs. ACIT, Central Circle, Allahabad

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

ITA 25/ALLD/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Oct 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.A. & Sh. SuyashFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR & Sh
Section 132(1)Section 153Section 153ASection 153DSection 250

…appreciating that in absence of any cogent material, the existence of exceptional circumstances beyond control of payer for application of rule 6DD(j) could not be said to be established in view of the ratio of decisions in case of Natesan Krishnamurty Vs ITO 103 Taxmann.com 342(Mad), Jhunjhunwala & Co Vs CIT 167 Taxman 58(Delhi), CIT Vs Singamshetty Subba Rao 357 ITR 529(A.P.), Pawar Patkar Constructions 159 ITD 406(Pune Trib). 6. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in holding that the payments in excess of Rs. 20,000 in violation 40A(3) were covered by exception within Rule 6…

M/S Jai Maa Sharda Service Station, Allahabad vs. ACIT, Central Circle, Allahabad

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

ITA 24/ALLD/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Oct 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.A. & Sh. SuyashFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR & Sh
Section 132(1)Section 153Section 153ASection 153DSection 250

…appreciating that in absence of any cogent material, the existence of exceptional circumstances beyond control of payer for application of rule 6DD(j) could not be said to be established in view of the ratio of decisions in case of Natesan Krishnamurty Vs ITO 103 Taxmann.com 342(Mad), Jhunjhunwala & Co Vs CIT 167 Taxman 58(Delhi), CIT Vs Singamshetty Subba Rao 357 ITR 529(A.P.), Pawar Patkar Constructions 159 ITD 406(Pune Trib). 6. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in holding that the payments in excess of Rs. 20,000 in violation 40A(3) were covered by exception within Rule 6…

M/S Subhash Stone Product Private Limited, Sonebhadra vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle, Allahabad

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

ITA 108/ALLD/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Oct 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.A. & Sh. SuyashFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR & Sh
Section 132(1)Section 153Section 153ASection 153DSection 250

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD BEFORE SH. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.36, 37, 38, 101, 125, 126, 127/ALLD/2023 A.Ys. 2005-06 to 2011-12 Ramji Vaish, vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income 86, New Bairahana, Allahabad Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad PAN: AAKPV7963M (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA Nos. 105, 106, 107, 108/ALLD/2019 A.Ys. 2005-06, 2011-12, 2008-09 & 2010-11 M/s Subhash Stone Product (P.) vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Ltd., Subhash Nagar, Bari Dalla, Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad Sonebhadra PAN: AAICS3246F (A…

Subhash Stone Product (P) Ltd., Sonebhadra vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle, Allahabad

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

ITA 107/ALLD/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Oct 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.A. & Sh. SuyashFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR & Sh
Section 132(1)Section 153Section 153ASection 153DSection 250

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD BEFORE SH. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.36, 37, 38, 101, 125, 126, 127/ALLD/2023 A.Ys. 2005-06 to 2011-12 Ramji Vaish, vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income 86, New Bairahana, Allahabad Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad PAN: AAKPV7963M (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA Nos. 105, 106, 107, 108/ALLD/2019 A.Ys. 2005-06, 2011-12, 2008-09 & 2010-11 M/s Subhash Stone Product (P.) vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Ltd., Subhash Nagar, Bari Dalla, Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad Sonebhadra PAN: AAICS3246F (A…

M/S. S.G. Enterprises, New Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

ITA 275/DEL/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Oct 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Kuldip Singh

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri N.K. Bansal, Senior DR
Section 40ASection 40A(3)Section 69

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH ‘E’ : NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER and SHRI KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.275/Del./2012 (ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2008-09) M/s. S.G. Enterprises, vs. ACIT, Circle 20 (1), 1/2687, Ram Lal Chandhok Marg, New Delhi. Kashmere Gate, New Delhi – 110 006. (PAN : AAPFS5959M) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : Shri Rakesh Gupta, Advocate REVENUE BY : Shri N.K. Bansal, Senior DR Date of Hearing : 02.09.2019 Date of Order : 01.10.2019 O R D E R PER KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER : Appellant, M/s. S.G. Enterprises (hereinafter referred to a…

Globalconnect Travels P.Ltd, New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward-10(2), New Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 8153/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Sept 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Sh. R. K. Pandaassessment Year: 2015-16 Global Connect Travels Ito P. Ltd. 403-404, Sagar Tower, Vs Ward – 10 (2) District Centre, Janak Puri, New Delhi New Delhi-110058 Pan No. Aafcg2562F (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 40A(3)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. R. K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2015-16 Global Connect Travels ITO P. Ltd. 403-404, Sagar Tower, Vs Ward – 10 (2) District Centre, Janak Puri, New Delhi New Delhi-110058 PAN No. AAFCG2562F (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Appellant by Sh. Naveen Singh, CA Respondent by Sh. S. L. Anuragi, Sr. DR Date of hearing: 13/08/2019 Date of Pronouncement: 16/09/2019 ORDER PER R.K. PANDA, AM: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 09.08.2018 of the CIT(A)-4, New Delhi relating to A.Y.2015-16. 2. The ass…

Natesan Krishnamurty v. ITO (103 Taxmann.com 342) — Cited in 19 Judgments | BharatTax