Torrent Financier's v. Asstt. CIT

73 TTJ 624Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2001#6246 most cited
19

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Judgments citing Torrent Financier's v. Asstt. CIT

AARVEE DENIMS & EXPORTS LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed, while that of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 993/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Mar 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Pramod M. Jagtap & T.R. Senthil Kumarassessment Year :2012-13 Aarvee Denims & Exports Dcit, Cir.1(1)(1) 191, Shahwadi, Vs Ahmedabad. Nr.Old Octroi Naka Narol-Sarkhej Highway Ahmedabad 382 405. Pan : Aabca 6019 P Assessment Year : 2012-13 Dcit, Cir.1(1)(1) Aarvee Denims & Exports Ahmedabad. Vs Ahmedabad 382 405. Pan : Aabca 6019 P अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/(Respondent) Assessee By : Shri D.K. Parikh, Ar Revenue By : Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 24/02/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 30/03/2022 आदेश/O R D E R Per T.R. Senthil Kumar: These Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & The Revenue Are Against Order Dated 30.3.2016 Passed By Ld.Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-1, Ahmedabad [For Short “Ld.Cit(A)] In Appeal No.Cit(A)-1/Dcit, Cir.1(1)(1)/738/2014-15 Relating To The Assessment Year 2012-13. We Dispose Of Both The Appeals By This Common Order.

For Appellant: Shri D.K. Parikh, ARFor Respondent: Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)

…nterest free funds, the ground of the appellant deserves to be accepted as the net cash profit for the year under consideration is more than 47 Crores as against which Capital work in process is only 7.94 Crores. The decision in the case of Torrent Financiers 73 TTJ 624 (AHD) and Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs Reliance Utility & Power Ltd 313 ITR 340 also lays down how the presumption about nexus is to be drawn. I have also considered the decision of the Delhi ITAT in the case of ACIT vs. Asmit Singh ITA No: 1862/Delhi/ 2012 in which CIT(A) deleted disallowance which was confirmed in favour of assessee b…

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. AARVEE DENIMS & EXPORTS LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed, while that of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1553/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Mar 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Pramod M. Jagtap & T.R. Senthil Kumarassessment Year :2012-13 Aarvee Denims & Exports Dcit, Cir.1(1)(1) 191, Shahwadi, Vs Ahmedabad. Nr.Old Octroi Naka Narol-Sarkhej Highway Ahmedabad 382 405. Pan : Aabca 6019 P Assessment Year : 2012-13 Dcit, Cir.1(1)(1) Aarvee Denims & Exports Ahmedabad. Vs Ahmedabad 382 405. Pan : Aabca 6019 P अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/(Respondent) Assessee By : Shri D.K. Parikh, Ar Revenue By : Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 24/02/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 30/03/2022 आदेश/O R D E R Per T.R. Senthil Kumar: These Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & The Revenue Are Against Order Dated 30.3.2016 Passed By Ld.Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-1, Ahmedabad [For Short “Ld.Cit(A)] In Appeal No.Cit(A)-1/Dcit, Cir.1(1)(1)/738/2014-15 Relating To The Assessment Year 2012-13. We Dispose Of Both The Appeals By This Common Order.

For Appellant: Shri D.K. Parikh, ARFor Respondent: Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)

…nterest free funds, the ground of the appellant deserves to be accepted as the net cash profit for the year under consideration is more than 47 Crores as against which Capital work in process is only 7.94 Crores. The decision in the case of Torrent Financiers 73 TTJ 624 (AHD) and Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs Reliance Utility & Power Ltd 313 ITR 340 also lays down how the presumption about nexus is to be drawn. I have also considered the decision of the Delhi ITAT in the case of ACIT vs. Asmit Singh ITA No: 1862/Delhi/ 2012 in which CIT(A) deleted disallowance which was confirmed in favour of assessee b…