Raja Kishor Raghuramy Reddy v. ACIT

112 Taxmann.com 134Supreme Court of India2019#1702 most cited

What is Raja Kishor Raghuramy Reddy v. ACIT authority for?

The Supreme Court considered the delay in filing an appeal and the appellant's justification for it. The court noted that the appellant's registered address was used for communication and that the postal authorities returned mail. The court referenced its earlier decision in 'Meda Raja Kishor Raghuramy Reddy Vs ACIT' when considering the appellant's case.

66

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,181 Indian tax judgments — from 2020 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Raja Kishor Raghuramy Reddy v. ACIT · Senior Bhosale Estate (HUF) v. ACIT · 112 Taxmann.com 134 · Supreme Court · delay in filing appeal · condonation of delay · sufficient cause · section 253(1) · section 246A · section 253(3)

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Raja Kishor Raghuramy Reddy v. ACIT

Shreeji Ceramic Industries, Morbi vs. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Rajkot

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 266/RJT/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot12 Aug 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. A.L.Saini, Am & Diesh Mohan Sinha, Jm आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.266/Rjt/2024 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2015-16) (Hybrid Hearing) Shreeji Ceramic Industries, The Principal Commissioner Of Vs. 8/A National Highway, Lalpar Income Tax – 1, Morbi - 363642 Rajkot "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aalfs8846B (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri D. M. Rindani, Ld. Ar Respondent By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Cit (Dr) सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 17/07/2025 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 12/08/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm: This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Learned Principle Commissioner Of Income Tax, Rajkot – 1 [In Short, “The Ld. Pcit”], Dated 30.03.2021 For The Assessment Year (Ay) 2015-16. 2. The Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Assessee Are As Follows.

For Appellant: Shri D. M. Rindani, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, CIT (DR)
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 263Section 263o

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT BEFORE DR. A.L.SAINI, AM & DIESH MOHAN SINHA, JM आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No.266/RJT/2024 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2015-16) (Hybrid Hearing) Shreeji Ceramic Industries, The Principal Commissioner of Vs. 8/A National Highway, Lalpar Income Tax – 1, Morbi - 363642 Rajkot "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AALFS8846B (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri D. M. Rindani, Ld. AR Respondent by : Shri Sanjay Punglia, CIT (DR) सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date of Hearing : 17/07/2025 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement : 12/08/2025 आदेश / O R D E R PER DINESH MOHAN SINHA,…

Thimmiah Narayanappa Muralidhar, Shivamogga vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-3, Shivamogga

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1578/BANG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year : 2017-18 Shri. Thimmiah Narayanappa Muralidhar, Vs. Ito, No.5, Karidevaraker I Cross, Gandhibazaar, Ward – 3, Shimoge – 577 202. Shivamogga. Pan : Bqkpm 0728 C Appellant Respondent Assessee By : S/Shri. Ravishankar & Monish Sowkar, Advocates. Revenue By : Shri. Ganesh R Gale, Standing Counsel For Department. Date Of Hearing : 23.09.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 23.09.2024

For Appellant: S/Shri. Ravishankar and Monish Sowkar, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Shri. Ganesh R Gale, Standing Counsel for Department
Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 234ASection 250Section 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year : 2017-18 Shri. Thimmiah Narayanappa Muralidhar, Vs. ITO, No.5, Karidevaraker I Cross, Gandhibazaar, Ward – 3, Shimoge – 577 202. Shivamogga. PAN : BQKPM 0728 C APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : S/Shri. Ravishankar and Monish Sowkar, Advocates. Revenue by : Shri. Ganesh R Gale, Standing Counsel for Department. Date of hearing : 23.09.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 23.09.2024 O R D E R Per George George K, Vice President: This appeal at the instance…

Kanumuri Bhaskara Raju, Bapulapadu Mandal vs. The the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Vijayawada

In the result, appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 75/VIZ/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam27 Apr 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.K.Choudhry, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीऱसं./I.T.A.No.704/Viz/2019 To 706/Viz/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Year:2009-10 To 2011-12) Smt.Samanthapudi Lavanya Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of D.No.5-1033-1, Vijayawada Road Income Tax Hanuman Junction, Central Circle Bapulapadu Mandal Vijayawada Krishna Dist. [Pan : Cnbps7658N]

…आयकरअपीऱीयअधिकरण, विशाखापटणमपीठ, विशाखापटणम IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM श्री एन के चौिरी,न्याययकसदस्य एिं श्री डड.एस .सुन्दरससंह, ऱेखासदस्यकेसमऺ BEFORE SHRI N.K.CHOUDHRY, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीऱसं./I.T.A.No.704/Viz/2019 to 706/Viz/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Year:2009-10 to 2011-12) Smt.Samanthapudi Lavanya Vs. Asst.Commissioner of D.No.5-1033-1, Vijayawada Road Income Tax Hanuman Junction, Central Circle Bapulapadu Mandal Vijayawada Krishna Dist. [PAN : CNBPS7658N] आयकरअपीऱसं./I.T.A.No.707/Viz/2019 to 709…