Raja Kishor Raghuramy Reddy v. ACIT
112 Taxmann.com 134Supreme Court of India2019#1702 most cited
What is Raja Kishor Raghuramy Reddy v. ACIT authority for?
The Supreme Court considered the delay in filing an appeal and the appellant's justification for it. The court noted that the appellant's registered address was used for communication and that the postal authorities returned mail. The court referenced its earlier decision in 'Meda Raja Kishor Raghuramy Reddy Vs ACIT' when considering the appellant's case.
66
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,181 Indian tax judgments — from 2020 to 2026.
Also referred to as
Raja Kishor Raghuramy Reddy v. ACIT · Senior Bhosale Estate (HUF) v. ACIT · 112 Taxmann.com 134 · Supreme Court · delay in filing appeal · condonation of delay · sufficient cause · section 253(1) · section 246A · section 253(3)