CIT v. Nikunj Eximp

216 Taxmann.com 171High Court2013#1054 most cited

What is CIT v. Nikunj Eximp authority for?

The Assessing Officer must consider additional evidence produced before the CIT(A) under Rule 46A and cannot reject it without proper appreciation of the facts, especially when the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from producing it earlier.

103

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Nikunj Eximp · Rule 46A · additional evidence · CIT(A) · Assessing Officer · sufficient cause · remand report · natural justice

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Nikunj Eximp

Mbm Tubes P.Ltd, Mumbai vs. ITO 5(2)(3), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 5938/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 Nov 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadalem/S Mbm Tubes Pvt Ltd Vs. Ito – 5(2)(3) Mohanlal Jain & Co, Ca Mumbai. Office No. 10, Chartered House, Ground Floor, Dr Ch Street, Marine Lines Mumbai – 2. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aafcm4177L Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : None Respondent By : Shri Chetan M. Kacha.Dr Date Of Hearing 09.11.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 21.11.2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Assessee Has Filed The Appeal Against The Order Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)Cit(A)-9, Mumbai Passed U/S 143(3) & 250 Of The Act. The Assessee Has Raised The Fallowing Grounds Of Appeal: M/S. Mbm Tubes Pvt Ltd, Mumbai. 1. On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case & In Law The Honble Cit(A) Erred In Treating The Genuine Purchases As Bogus By Taking Peak Credit Of Purchase Parties Listed On Mvat Site As Un Explained Purchases Of Rs.55,80,857/- As Unexplained U/Sec69C Of The It Act & The Reasons Assigned For Doing Are Wrong & Contrary To The Provision Of Income Tax & Rules Made There Under. 2. Your Appellant Crave,Leave To Add,Alter,Amend,Or Modify Any Or All Grounds Of Appeal On Or Before The Date Of Hearing.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Chetan M. Kacha.DR
Section 133(6)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER M/s MBM Tubes Pvt Ltd Vs. ITO – 5(2)(3) Mohanlal Jain & Co, CA Mumbai. Office No. 10, Chartered House, Ground Floor, DR CH Street, Marine Lines Mumbai – 2. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AAFCM4177L Appellant .. Respondent Appellant by : None Respondent by : Shri Chetan M. Kacha.DR Date of Hearing 09.11.2022 Date of Pronouncement 21.11.2022 आदेश / O R D E R PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE JM: The assessee has filed the appeal against the order passed by the Commiss…

Shri Rohinton Cyrus Malesra, Mumbai vs. The ITO -19(3) (1), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1598/MUM/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Mar 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleshri Rohinton Cyrus Vs. Ito – 19(3)(1) Malesra Matru Mandir, A-201, Simla House, Tardeo Opp L.D.Ruparel Marg Mumbai – 400007 Nepean Sea Road, Mumbai – 400026. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aagpm5502K Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Shri Anil Gala.Ar Respondent By : Shri Pavan Kumar Beerla.Dr Date Of Hearing 21.03.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 24.03.2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Assessee Has Filed The Appeal Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-30, Mumbai Passed U/S 147 R.W.S 143(3) & 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal.

For Appellant: Shri Anil Gala.ARFor Respondent: Shri Pavan Kumar Beerla.DR
Section 143Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER Shri Rohinton Cyrus Vs. ITO – 19(3)(1) Malesra Matru Mandir, A-201, Simla House, Tardeo Opp L.D.Ruparel Marg Mumbai – 400007 Nepean Sea Road, Mumbai – 400026. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AAGPM5502K Appellant .. Respondent Appellant by : Shri Anil Gala.AR Respondent by : Shri Pavan Kumar Beerla.DR Date of Hearing 21.03.2022 Date of Pronouncement 24.03.2022 आदेश / O R D E R PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE JM: The assessee has filed the appeal against the order…

Shri. Balkrishna Abaji Rane (HUF), Mumbai vs. ITO 21(1)(2), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 676/MUM/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Feb 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleshri Balkrishna Abaji Vs. Ito- 21(1)(2), Rane (Huf) Aayakar Bhavan, 5-B, Arun, 278, Mogal M.K.Road, Church Lane, Mahim, Mumbai – Gate, Mumbai-400020. 400016. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaahb7531B Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Shri.Ronak Doshi.Ar Respondent By : Shri.Brajendra Kumar.Dr Date Of Hearing 02.02.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 09.02.2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm:

For Appellant: Shri.Ronak Doshi.ARFor Respondent: Shri.Brajendra Kumar.DR
Section 133(6)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER Shri Balkrishna Abaji Vs. ITO- 21(1)(2), Rane (HUF) Aayakar Bhavan, 5-B, Arun, 278, Mogal M.K.Road, Church Lane, Mahim, Mumbai – Gate, Mumbai-400020. 400016. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AAAHB7531B Appellant .. Respondent Appellant by : Shri.Ronak Doshi.AR Respondent by : Shri.Brajendra Kumar.DR Date of Hearing 02.02.2022 Date of Pronouncement 09.02.2022 आदेश / O R D E R PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE JM: The assessee has filed the appeal against the order of…