CIT v. Nikunj Eximp

216 Taxmann.com 171High Court2013#1054 most cited

What is CIT v. Nikunj Eximp authority for?

The Assessing Officer must consider additional evidence produced before the CIT(A) under Rule 46A and cannot reject it without proper appreciation of the facts, especially when the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from producing it earlier.

103

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Nikunj Eximp · Rule 46A · additional evidence · CIT(A) · Assessing Officer · sufficient cause · remand report · natural justice

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Nikunj Eximp

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 3, Mumbai vs. Unitop Aquacare, Mumbai

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 566/MUM/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Apr 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Hon'Ble & Shri O.P. Meena, Hon'Blea.C.I.T Circle – 3 V. M/S. Unitop Aquacare Room No.2, 6Th Floor, 501, 5Th Floor, Dosti Pinnacle, Ashar I.T. Park, M.I.D.C, Plot No. E/7, Road No. 22, Wagle Industrial Estate, Mic, Wagle Estate, Thane, Mumbai – 400 604 Thane (W) – 400 604 Pan: Aabfu 6592 L (Appellant) (Respondent) M/S. Unitop Aquacare D.C.I.T Circle – 3 V. 501, 5Th Floor, Dosti Pinnacle, 6Th Floor, Ashar I.T. Park, Plot No. E/7, Road No. 22, Road No. 16-Z Mic, Wagle Estate, Wagle Industrial Estate, Thane (W) - 400604 Thane, Mumbai – 400 604 Pan: Aabfu 6592 L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Devendra Jain Department By : Shri Rajiv Gubgotra

For Appellant: Shri Devendra JainFor Respondent: Shri Rajiv Gubgotra
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “F”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI C.N. PRASAD, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI O.P. MEENA, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER A.C.I.T Circle – 3 v. M/s. Unitop Aquacare Room No.2, 6th Floor, 501, 5th Floor, Dosti Pinnacle, Ashar I.T. Park, M.I.D.C, Plot No. E/7, Road No. 22, Wagle Industrial Estate, MIC, Wagle Estate, Thane, Mumbai – 400 604 Thane (W) – 400 604 PAN: AABFU 6592 L (Appellant) (Respondent) M/s. Unitop Aquacare D.C.I.T Circle – 3 v. 501, 5th Floor, Dosti Pinnacle, 6th Floor, Ashar I.T. Park, Plot No. E/7, Road No. 22, Road No. 16-Z MIC, Wagle Estate, Wagle Industrial E…

Unitop Aquacare, Mumbai vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 3, Mumbai

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 7397/MUM/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Apr 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Hon'Ble & Shri O.P. Meena, Hon'Blea.C.I.T Circle – 3 V. M/S. Unitop Aquacare Room No.2, 6Th Floor, 501, 5Th Floor, Dosti Pinnacle, Ashar I.T. Park, M.I.D.C, Plot No. E/7, Road No. 22, Wagle Industrial Estate, Mic, Wagle Estate, Thane, Mumbai – 400 604 Thane (W) – 400 604 Pan: Aabfu 6592 L (Appellant) (Respondent) M/S. Unitop Aquacare D.C.I.T Circle – 3 V. 501, 5Th Floor, Dosti Pinnacle, 6Th Floor, Ashar I.T. Park, Plot No. E/7, Road No. 22, Road No. 16-Z Mic, Wagle Estate, Wagle Industrial Estate, Thane (W) - 400604 Thane, Mumbai – 400 604 Pan: Aabfu 6592 L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Devendra Jain Department By : Shri Rajiv Gubgotra

For Appellant: Shri Devendra JainFor Respondent: Shri Rajiv Gubgotra
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “F”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI C.N. PRASAD, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI O.P. MEENA, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER A.C.I.T Circle – 3 v. M/s. Unitop Aquacare Room No.2, 6th Floor, 501, 5th Floor, Dosti Pinnacle, Ashar I.T. Park, M.I.D.C, Plot No. E/7, Road No. 22, Wagle Industrial Estate, MIC, Wagle Estate, Thane, Mumbai – 400 604 Thane (W) – 400 604 PAN: AABFU 6592 L (Appellant) (Respondent) M/s. Unitop Aquacare D.C.I.T Circle – 3 v. 501, 5th Floor, Dosti Pinnacle, 6th Floor, Ashar I.T. Park, Plot No. E/7, Road No. 22, Road No. 16-Z MIC, Wagle Estate, Wagle Industrial E…