CIT v. Nikunj Eximp
216 Taxmann.com 171High Court2013#1061 most cited
What is CIT v. Nikunj Eximp authority for?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal may admit additional evidence under Rule 46A where the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from producing it before the Assessing Officer, even if the Assessing Officer objected in a remand report.
103
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2026.
Also referred to as
CIT v. Nikunj Eximp · Rule 46A · additional evidence · CIT(A) · assessment proceedings · sufficient cause · remand report · Bombay High Court
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing CIT v. Nikunj Eximp
Showing 1–20 of 103 · Page 1 of 6