Loading High Court cases…
166 orders · Page 4 of 4
The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue. This was based on the CBDT's circular enhancing monetary limits for filing appeals to reduce litigation.
The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue. The dismissal was based on the CBDT's circular enhancing monetary limits for filing appeals to reduce litigation.
The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue. This dismissal was based on the monetary limits for filing appeals as per the CBDT circular.
The High Court dismissed the appeal. This was based on a CBDT circular that enhanced monetary limits for filing appeals to reduce litigation.
The High Court allowed the withdrawal of the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, and any pending miscellaneous applications were also closed.
The High Court accepted the submission that the appeals should be disposed of in light of the new circular. The circular mandates that appeals should not be filed if the tax effect is below the prescribed monetary limits.
The High Court dismissed the appeal. This was based on a CBDT circular that enhanced monetary limits for filing appeals, and the tax effect in this case was below the prescribed limit.
The High Court held that the development agreement did not constitute a 'transfer' under Section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act as consideration was not paid and possession was handed over for a limited purpose. The findings of the Tribunal were deemed perverse.
The High Court granted the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal. The withdrawal was permitted in light of a circular, with liberty to revive the appeal if the subject matter falls under exceptions in another circular.
The High Court, in light of a circular, granted the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive it under specific circumstances mentioned in another circular.