296 orders · Page 2 of 6
The High Court held that in light of the circular dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, which fixes the monetary limit for the Department to pursue matters before the High Court at Rs. 1,00,00,000/-, and considering that the addition pressed in the present appeal is Rs. 6,72,015/-, the tax effect is below the permissible limit. Consequently, the appeal is disposed of. The reasoning is based on the administrative instruction from the CBDT regarding the monetary limit for appeals. The ratio decidendi is that appeals with a tax effect below the stipulated monetary limit set by the CBDT should not be pursued by the Revenue before the High Court. No specific finding was made on the merits of the addition. The operative direction is that the appeal is disposed of.
The High Court of Delhi disposed of the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax. The decision was based on the circular dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, which stipulated a monetary limit of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- for the Department to pursue matters before the High Court. The tax effect in the present appeal was Rs. 87,40,594/-, which was below the prescribed limit. Therefore, the appeal was disposed of on this administrative ground, without delving into the merits of the case. No specific finding was made on the substantive issues of the appeal, as it was dismissed due to the tax effect.
The High Court held that in light of the circular dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, which fixes the monetary limit for the Department to pursue matters before the High Court at Rs. 1,00,00,000/-, and considering the addition pressed in the present appeal of Rs. 2,98,855/-, the tax effect in the appeal is below the permissible limit. Consequently, the present appeal is disposed of. The reasoning is that the appeal does not meet the financial threshold set by the CBDT for the Revenue to continue litigation at the High Court level. The operative direction is the disposal of the appeal. No issue was expressly left undecided; the appeal was disposed of on a procedural/administrative ground.
The High Court disposed of the appeal in light of the circular dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes. This circular fixes the monetary limit for the Department to pursue matters before the High Court at Rs. 1,00,00,000/-. The Court noted that the disallowance of Rs. 87 lacs, as mentioned in the CIT(A)'s order dated 22.01.2000, and confirmed by a letter dated 20.11.2019 from the ACIT, Judicial-2, New Delhi, results in a tax effect below the permissible limit. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of on this procedural ground without delving into the merits of the disallowance.
The High Court disposed of the appeal. The court noted a circular dated 08.08.2019 from the Ministry of Finance, Central Board of Direct Taxes, which stipulated a monetary limit of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- for the Department to pursue matters before the High Court. The court observed that the tax effect in the present appeal was below this permissible limit. Consequently, based on this circular and a letter from the ACIT dated 20.11.2019, the appeal was disposed of. No decision was made on the substantive merits of the tax demands.
The High Court of Delhi disposed of the appeal. The decision was based on a circular dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes (Judicial Section), Government of India. This circular fixes the monetary limit for the Department to pursue matters before the High Court at Rs. 1,00,00,000/-. The income tax demands in question are Rs. 19,43,175/- and Rs. 1,57,517/-. The tax effect in the present appeal was found to be below the permissible limit. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of on this administrative ground, without delving into the merits of the case. No specific finding was made on the substantive tax issues.
The High Court upheld the maintenance amount awarded by the Family Court but directed that it should be payable from the date of the application, not prospectively. The husband was also directed to clear arrears within a month.
The High Court of Delhi disposed of the appeal. The decision was based on a circular dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, which sets a monetary limit of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- for the Department to pursue matters before the High Court. The judgment notes that the tax effect in the present appeal is below this permissible limit. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of on this procedural ground, without delving into the merits of the income tax demand.
The High Court of Delhi disposed of the appeal in light of the circular dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes (Judicial Section). This circular fixes the monetary limit for the Department to pursue matters before the High Court at Rs. 1,00,00,000/-. The judgment notes that the tax effect in the present appeal, considering the demands of Rs. 11,44,934/-, Rs. 65,597/-, and Rs. 10,18,272/-, is below this permissible limit. Therefore, the appeal is disposed of on this procedural ground, without delving into the merits of the substantive issues.
The High Court decided to dispose of the present appeal. The Court took note of the circular dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, which stipulated a monetary limit of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- for the Department to pursue matters before the High Court. The Court observed that the income tax demand of Rs. 55,50,620/-, as mentioned in the CIT(A)'s order dated 20.04.2001, and further clarified by the ACIT's letter dated 20.11.2019, indicated that the tax effect in the present appeal was below the prescribed limit. Consequently, based on the circular and the tax effect, the appeal was disposed of. No decision on the merits of the appeal was made.
The High Court of Delhi disposed of the appeal in light of the circular dated 08.08.2019 issued by the CBDT. This circular fixes the monetary limit for the Department to pursue matters before the High Court at Rs. 1,00,00,000/-. The Court noted that the income tax demand of Rs. 86,93,256/- as mentioned in the CIT(A) order dated 03.03.2010, and the tax effect in the present appeal, were below the permissible limit. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of on this procedural ground, without delving into the merits of the case. No specific issue was left undecided, as the disposal was based on the tax effect limit.