MMTC LTD. vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-5(1),
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the issue of treating interest income needed to be recomputed by the AO. Grounds 3 to 6 were allowed for statistical purposes, directing the AO to recompute the Section 80HHC deduction in light of the Reliance Energy Ltd. judgment. The additional ground regarding credit for taxes paid in Singapore on dividend income was also restored to the AO for fresh consideration.
What were the facts?
The assessee, MMTC Ltd., a government enterprise, appealed against the CIT(A)'s order upholding the AO's treatment of interest and dividend income as 'income from other sources', thereby denying deduction under Section 80HHC. The AO had also made additions and adjustments to business income, leading to a negative adjusted business profit.
What were the issues?
Whether interest and dividend income should be treated as business income for Section 80HHC deduction, and how Section 80AB applies to the computation of such deductions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(20)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Woodward Governor India Pvt. Ltd.968 citing284 ITR 584 · 2009 · Read judgment
- CIT v. Sterling Foods311 citing237 ITR 579 · 1999 · SC · Read judgment
- Cambay Electric Supply Industrial Co. Ltd. v. CIT245 citing113 ITR 84 · 1978 · SC · Read judgment
- ACG Associated Capsules (P) Ltd. v. CIT144 citing343 ITR 89 · 2012 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Shriram Honda Power Equipment & Ors.126 citing289 ITR 475 · 2007 · HC
- IPCA Laboratories Ltd. v. DCIT122 citing266 ITR 521 · 2004 · SC
- CIT v. Metalman Auto P. Ltd.91 citing336 ITR 434 · 2011 · HC
- Maruti Udyog v. DCIT87 citing92 ITD 119 · 2005 · ITAT
- CIT v. K. Ravindranathan Nair57 citing295 ITR 228 · 2007 · SC · Read judgment
- Alfa Laval India Ltd. v. DCIT56 citing266 ITR 418 · 2004 · HC
- CIT v. Reliance Energy Limited47 citing127 Taxmann.com 69 · 2021 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Tridoss Laboratories Ltd.35 citing328 ITR 448 · 2010 · HC
- CIT v. Bangalore Clothing co.23 citing260 ITR 371 · 2003 · HC
- DCIT v. K. K. Doshi and Co.21 citing245 ITR 849 · 2000 · HC
- Commissioner of Income-tax v. Williamson Financial Services and Ors.17 citing297 ITR 17 · 2008 · SC
- Cloth Traders (P) Ltd. v. CIT16 citing3 SCC 538 · 1986
- JCIT v. Kadri Mills (CBE) Ltd.7 citing76 TTJ 38 · ITAT
- CIT v. Parry Agro Industries Ltd.4 citing257 ITR 41 · HC
- SMS Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. DCIT4 citing142 ITD 157 · ITAT
- V.M. Salgaonkar & Brother (P) Ltd. v. ACIT4 citing281 CTR 191 · 2015 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES ‘E’ : NEW DELHI
Before: SH. G.S.PANNU, HON’BLE & SH. ANUBHAV SHARMA
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:
The Assessee has come in appeal against order dated 17.03.2006 in appeal no. 91/2005-06 for the assessment year 2003-04 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-VIII, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘First Appellate Authority’ or in short ‘Ld. F.A.A.’) in appeal before it against order dated 28.10.2005 u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 passed by DCIT, Circle 5(1), New Delhi ( herein after referred to as ‘Ld. Assessing officer or in short Ld. AO’). M/s. MMTC Ltd. 2
The facts in brief are the assessee is a Govt, of India Enterprise and is engaged in business of manufacturing of medallions and jewellery, soya oil and DOC
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80HHC
- Sheena Industries, Panipat vs ACIT Circle, PanipatITA 3076/DEL/2008[2004-2005]Status: Disposed26 May 2026AY 2004-2005
- Sarla Fashion Garments, New Delhi vs JCIT, Range-31, DelhiITA 1799/DEL/2006[2001-2002]Status: Disposed20 May 2026AY 2001-2002
- M/S Vardhman Textiles Ltd vs C I T and AnrITA/517/200826 Feb 2026
- C I T vs M/S Glaxo Smithkline Consumer Helathcare LtdITA/271/20095 Feb 2026
- CIT, Chandigarh vs M/S Hindustan Unilever LtdITA/677/20085 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026