Section 80AB of the Income Tax Act

The decision most relied on for Section 80AB is Synco Industries Ltd. v. Assessing Officer (IT) & Another (299 ITR 444), cited in 82 of the 76 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 80AB

Synco Industries Ltd. v. Assessing Officer (IT) & Another
299 ITR 444 · 2008 · Supreme Court
82
citing judgments

When computing deductions under Chapter VI-A, such as Section 80IA, losses from other business undertakings must be set off against the profits of the eligible undertaking before calculating the deduction. No deduction under Section 80IA is permissible if the overall 'Profits & Gains of Business or Profession' results in a loss.

CIT v. Dewan Kraft System (P) Ltd.
297 ITR 305 · 2008 · High Court
27
citing judgments

Profits of an eligible undertaking cannot be adjusted against losses from other undertakings when calculating deductions under sections like 80-IA, 80IB, or 80IC. The overriding provisions of these sections require that deductions are calculated based on the profits of the eligible unit itself, without set-off.

CIT v. Kotagiri Industrial Co-operative Tea Factory Ltd.
224 ITR 605 · 1997 · Supreme Court
25
citing judgments

Gross total income must be computed by setting off losses, including brought-forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation, before any deductions under Chapter VI-A can be considered. Deductions under Chapter VI-A are only available if the resulting gross total income is positive.

CIT v. Sona Koyo Steering Systems Ltd.
321 ITR 463 · 2010 · High Court
18
citing judgments

Each industrial undertaking must be considered independently when calculating deductions under Section 80-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961, even if the assessee has multiple units and incurs losses in one unit while making profits in another.

Reliance Hypermart Ltd. v. ACIT (ITAT, Mumbai)
102 Taxmann.com 98 · 2019 · ITAT
10
citing judgments

Where an assessee makes a suo-moto disallowance under section 14A read with rule 8D, any further disallowance by the Assessing Officer on the same grounds is not sustainable without recording specific satisfaction regarding the assessee's claim.

IPCA Laboratory Ltd. v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai
12 SCC 742 · 2004 · Reported
10
citing judgments

When computing deductions under Section 80HHC, profits from the export of self-manufactured goods and trading goods cannot be considered separately if there is a loss in one, and the deduction is admissible if the overall business income is positive after set-off.

CIT v. RPG Telecom Ltd. (Kar)
292 ITR 355 · 2007 · Reported
9
citing judgments
CIT v. Nima Specific Family Trust
248 ITR 29 · 2001 · High Court
8
citing judgments
CIT v. Sundravel Match Industries Pvt Ltd. (MAD)
245 ITR 605 · 2000 · Reported
7
citing judgments
Padmasundara Rao v. State of TN
224 ITR 672 · Supreme Court
4
citing judgments

Judgments on Section 80AB

ACIT, Circle-2, Noida vs. Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, Noida

In the result, the assessing officer is directed to allow both the disallowances

ITA 6732/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Dec 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shripawan Singhand Shribrajesh Kumar Singhआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6540/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2010-11 (Physical Hearing) Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, बनाम Dcit, Phase-Ii, Dadri Road, Noida, Circle-2, Vs. Uttar Pradesh. Aayakar Bhawan, 2D, A-Block, Sector-24, Pan No.Aaaln0639A Noida, Uttar Pradesh. अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6541/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, बनाम Dcit,Circle-2, Phase-Ii, Dadri Road, Noida, Aayakar Bhawan, 2D, Vs. Uttar Pradesh. A-Block, Sector-24, Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Pan No.Aaaln0639A अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6732/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 Acit, बनाम Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, Circle-2, Phase-Ii, Dadri Road, Noida, Vs. Aayakar Bhawan, 2D, Uttar Pradesh. A-Block, Sector-24, Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Pan No.Aaaln0639A अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessee By Shri Ram Avtar Sharma, Ca & Shri Bhupesh Agarwal, Ca Revenue By Ms. Monika Singh, Cit-Dr सुनवाईक"तारीख/ Date Of Hearing: 26.11.2025 उ"ोषणाक"तारीख/Pronouncement On 12.12.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per Pawan Singh:

Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 34Section 80ASection 80I

Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, Noida vs. DCIT, Circle-2, Noida

In the result, the assessing officer is directed to allow both the disallowances

ITA 6540/DEL/2018[20101-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Dec 2025

Bench: Shripawan Singhand Shribrajesh Kumar Singhआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6540/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2010-11 (Physical Hearing) Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, बनाम Dcit, Phase-Ii, Dadri Road, Noida, Circle-2, Vs. Uttar Pradesh. Aayakar Bhawan, 2D, A-Block, Sector-24, Pan No.Aaaln0639A Noida, Uttar Pradesh. अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6541/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, बनाम Dcit,Circle-2, Phase-Ii, Dadri Road, Noida, Aayakar Bhawan, 2D, Vs. Uttar Pradesh. A-Block, Sector-24, Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Pan No.Aaaln0639A अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6732/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 Acit, बनाम Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, Circle-2, Phase-Ii, Dadri Road, Noida, Vs. Aayakar Bhawan, 2D, Uttar Pradesh. A-Block, Sector-24, Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Pan No.Aaaln0639A अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessee By Shri Ram Avtar Sharma, Ca & Shri Bhupesh Agarwal, Ca Revenue By Ms. Monika Singh, Cit-Dr सुनवाईक"तारीख/ Date Of Hearing: 26.11.2025 उ"ोषणाक"तारीख/Pronouncement On 12.12.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per Pawan Singh:

Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 34Section 80ASection 80I

Ramalingam Manonmani, Coimbatore vs. ITO, Ncw-15(1), Chennai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2124/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Oct 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.2124/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19 Ramalingam Manonmani, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 5C/1, Bharathi Nagar, 1St Street, Non Corporate Ward 15(1), Wanaparthy Block (New Block), 2Nd Varatharajapuram, Coimbatore 641 015. Floor, 121 M.G. Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. [Pan:Bazpm1359Q] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri N.V. Narayanan, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 21.10.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 29.10.2024 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 11.06.2024 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac], Delhi For The Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. The Assessee Raised 8 Grounds Of Appeal Amongst Which, The Only Issue Emanates For Consideration Is Whether The Ld. Cit(A) Justified In Confirming The Order Of The Assessing Officer Exparte Of The Assessee.

For Appellant: Shri N.V. Narayanan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 69ASection 80I