NOIDA SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE AUTHORITY,NOIDA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2, NOIDA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings were initiated without valid reasons and that the CIT(A) erred in upholding the disallowances of excess depreciation and lease rent. It was noted that the entire profit of SEZ is deductible under Section 80IAB, making such disallowances academic.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, claimed deduction under Section 80IAB. The Assessing Officer initiated reassessment proceedings alleging that the return was filed belatedly, impacting the deduction claim. The CIT(A) upheld certain disallowances related to excess depreciation and lease rent.
What were the issues?
Whether reassessment proceedings were validly initiated and whether disallowances of excess depreciation and lease rent impacted the taxable income given the 100% deduction under Section 80IAB.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 80AB,Section 80AC,Section 80IAB,Section 139(1),Section 139(4),Section 10(20)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(15)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd.2,664 citing88 ITR 192 · 1973 · SC
- Bajaj Tempo Ltd. v. CIT289 citing62 Taxmann 480 · 1992 · SC
- CIT v. Greenworld Corporation197 citing314 ITR 81 · 2009 · SC · Read judgment
- PCIT v. Wipro Ltd.192 citing140 Taxmann.com 223 · 2022 · SC
- AA520 Veerappampalayam Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax78 citing138 Taxmann.com 571 · 2022 · HC
- CIT v. Ms. Jagriti Aggarwal66 citing15 Taxmann.com 146 · 2011 · HC
- CIT v. Rajesh Kumar Jalan66 citing286 ITR 274 · 2006 · HC
- Nileshwar Rangekallu Chethu Vyavasaya Thozhilali Sahakarana Sangham v. CIT31 citing152 Taxmann.com 347 · 2023 · HC · Read judgment
- 1 Income-tax Officer-Ward 5(1) v. Keval Construction28 citing33 Taxmann.com 277 · 2013 · HC
- 277 (Guj.) 2 Commissioner of Income-tax-IV, Nagpur v. Sunil Vishwambharnath Tiwari23 citing63 Taxmann.com 241 · 2016 · HC
- Fibrefill Engineers v. CIT22 citing83 Taxmann.com 34 · 2017
- CIT v. Ramachandra Hatcheries9 citing305 ITR 117 · 2008 · HC
- Suolificio Linea Italia (India) (P.) Ltd. v. JCIT9 citing93 Taxmann.com 462 · 2018 · HC
- 146 (P & H), PCIT v. HP Housing and Urban Development Authority7 citing157 Taxmann.com 598 · 2023 · HC
- 257 ITR 533 citing257 ITR 53
Heard together (3 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “F” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRIPAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBERAND SHRIBRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6540/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2010-11 (Physical Hearing) NOIDA SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE AUTHORITY, बनाम DCIT, Phase-II, Dadri Road, Noida, Circle-2, Vs.
Uttar Pradesh.
Aayakar Bhawan, 2D, A-Block, Sector-24, PAN No.AAALN0639A Noida, Uttar Pradesh. अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6541/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 NOIDA SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE AUTHORITY, बनाम DCIT,Circle-2, Phase-II, Dadri Road, Noida, A-Block, Sector-24, Noida, Uttar Pradesh. PAN No.AAALN0639A अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6732/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 ACIT, बनाम NOIDA SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE AUTHORITY, Circle-2, Phase-II, Dadri Road, Noida, Vs.
Aayakar Bhawan, 2D, Uttar Pradesh. A-Block, Sector-24, Noida, Uttar Pradesh. PAN No.AAALN0639A अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessee by Shri Ram Avtar Sharma, CA & Shri Bhupesh Agarwal, CA Revenue by Ms. Monika Singh, CIT-DR सुनवाईक"तारीख/ Date of hearing: 26.11.2025 उ"ोषणाक"तारीख/Pronounc
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026