SARLA FASHION GARMENTS,,NEW DELHI vs. JCIT, RANGE-31,, DELHI
What were the facts?
The CIT set aside an order allowing deduction under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act, arguing it should be computed after deducting the Section 80HHC deduction. The assessee appealed this decision.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT's interpretation of the law was incorrect, citing the Supreme Court's decision in Shital Fibers Limited. Therefore, the AO's original order allowing the deduction was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue.
What were the issues?
Whether the deduction under Section 80IB should be computed after reducing the gross total income by the deduction allowed under Section 80HHC, and if the CIT's order under Section 263 was justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80IB,Section 80HHC,Section 80IA(9),Section 263,Section 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “F” NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD & SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI
PER SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
In this case there is an order dated 17.12.2025, passed in MA No.341/Del/2022, through which an earlier appeal of the assessee for AY 2001-02 (being the year under adjudication) was dismissed for non- persuasion with liberty to file for recall as and when the correct address was ascertained. Thereafter, the appeal was recalled through the instant MA and fixed before regular bench.
1 SARLA FASHION GARMENTS
This appeal arises from order u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter as “the Act”), passed by Ld. CIT(A), Delhi-XI, order dated 14.03.2006. It i
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80IB
- D.C.I.T., Circle - 10(1), Kolkata vs M/S. Berger Paints India Ltd., KolkataITA 740/KOL/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Tasa Foods Private Limited, Bangalore vs DCIT, Circle-7(1)(1), BengaluruITA 2908/BANG/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Uflex Limited, Delhi vs DCIT/ACIT Cen Cir-II, NoidaITTPA 280/DEL/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed21 Aug 2026AY 2022-23
- Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Noida vs Uflex Limited, DelhiITTPA 272/DEL/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed21 Aug 2026AY 2020-21
- Uflex Limited, Pamposh Enclave, Greater… vs DCIT/ACIT Cen Cir-II, NoidaITTPA 260/DEL/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Aug 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smita Chawda vs. Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Sahil vs. M/S Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Mayank Arc And Electrodes Private Limited & Anr. vs. Assistant Commissioner CGST Laxmi Nagar Division & Ors.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Jogender Proprietor Of M/S J.K. Construction vs. The Joint Commissioner (Appeals-Ii) & Anr.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Murugan Tyres vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer-1/ The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 6 Oct 2026