M/S ACG ASSOCIATED CAPSULES PVT. LTD. vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-IV, MUMBAI

CIVIL APPEAL No. 1914/2012Supreme Court[2012] 2 S.C.R. 40108 February 2012Bench: 3 JudgesAuthor: S.H. KAPADIA, A.K. PATNAIK, SWATANTER KUMAR15 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What were the facts?

The appeals before the Supreme Court concerned the interpretation of Explanation (baa) to Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961, specifically regarding the deduction of ninety per cent of certain receipts included in business profits. The primary issue was whether this deduction applied to gross receipts or net receipts after deducting related expenses. In Civil Appeal No. 1914 of 2012, the assessee, ACG Associated Capsules Pvt. Ltd., challenged the Bombay High Court's decision. In Civil Appeal No. 4534 of 2008, the Revenue appealed against the Delhi High Court's order which upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision in favour of the assessee, Bharat Rasayan Limited. The procedural history involved appeals through the Assessing Officer, Commissioner (Appeals), Tribunal, and High Court.

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Supreme Court held that for the purpose of determining "profits of the business" under Explanation (baa) to Section 80HHC, only ninety per cent of the net amount of receipts by way of brokerage, commission, interest, rent, or similar nature, which is actually included in the profits of the assessee as computed under the head 'Profits and Gains of Business or Profession', is to be deducted. This means that if any portion of such receipts is allowed as an expense and not included in the profits, ninety per cent of that portion cannot be deducted. The Court reasoned that the language of Explanation (baa) refers to receipts "included in such profits," implying both the nature and the quantum of receipts that form part of the computed business profits. The principle is that deductions under Section 80HHC should be based on the actual profits earned from business activities, not on gross receipts before considering related expenses. In Civil Appeal No. 1914 of 2012, the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for recalculation. In Civil Appeal No. 4534 of 2008, the appeal was dismissed as the High Court's view was consistent with the Supreme Court's ruling. The issue regarding DEPB sale was not explicitly decided by the Supreme Court in the provided extract, as it was part of the High Court's decision being appealed in one of the cases.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, for the purpose of determining "profits of the business" under Explanation (baa) to Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961, ninety per cent of only the net interest included in the profits of the business, as computed under the head 'Profits and Gains of Business or Profession', is to be deducted, or if it applies to gross interest. (Mixed question of law and fact, turning on Section 80HHC and Explanation (baa)). Assessee's contention (implied from the Tribunal's decision and the Supreme Court's eventual holding): Ninety per cent of net interest, after deducting related expenses, should be deducted. Revenue's contention (implied from the Assessing Officer's action and the High Court's initial ruling in one case): Ninety per cent of gross interest should be deducted. 2. Whether the entire amount received on sale of Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) represents profit on transfer of DEPB under Section 28(iiid) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. (Question of law, turning on Section 28(iiid)). Assessee's contention: Not explicitly recorded, but the High Court's reliance on its prior judgment suggests the assessee argued against the entire amount being profit. Revenue's contention: Not explicitly recorded, but the High Court's decision in favour of the Revenue on this point suggests the Revenue argued that the entire DEPB amount was profit.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80HHC,Section 28,Section 28(iiid)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

[2012] 2 S.C.R. 401 M/S ACG ASSOCIATED CAPSULES PVT. LTD. A (FORMERLY M/S ASSOCIATED CAPSULES PVT. LTD.) v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-IV, MUMBAI (Civil Appeal No. 1914 of 2012) B FEBRUARY 08, 2012 . [S.H. KAPADIA, CJI, A.K. PATNAIK AND SWATANTER KUMAR, JJ.] c Income Tax Act, 1961: s.BOHHC, Explanation (baa) - Deduction under - Held: Ninety per cent of the net interest, which has been included in the profits of the business of the assessee as computed under the head 'Profits and Gains of Business or Profession' is to be deducted under clause (1) D of Explanation (baa) to s. BOHHC for determining the profits of the business. ! The question which arose for consideration in the instant appeals was whether while determining the profits of the business as defined in Explanation (baa) to E Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961, ninety per cent of only the net interest which has been included in the profits of the business of the assessee as computed under the head 'Profits and Gains of Busniness and Profession' would be excluded for the purpose of F working out the deduction under Section 80HHC of the Act.

Disposing of the appeals, the Cou

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 80HHC

All 989 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80HHC →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →