M/S. SHRI NATH CORPORATION,JAIPUR vs. DCIT, C.C.-2, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the facts of the cases cited by the revenue were distinguishable from the present case. It upheld the deletion of the addition of Rs. 1,56,63,325/- made by the AO on account of cash sales during the pre-demonetization period.
What were the facts?
The case involves cross-appeals by the assessee and revenue concerning the assessment year 2017-18, arising from an order passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 153A of the Income Tax Act. A search action under Section 132 was conducted on the assessee's group.
What were the issues?
The key issues were the rejection of books of accounts, estimation of gross profit rate on declared turnover, additions on account of alleged unaccounted profit from alleged unaccounted sales, and the applicability of Section 115BBE.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 145(3),Section 153A,Section 132,Section 143(3),Section 115BBE
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(10)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Sumati Dayal v. CIT1,967 citing214 ITR 801 · 1995 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Durga Prasad More1,579 citing82 ITR 540 · 1971 · SC
- Sreelekha Banerjee v. CIT281 citing49 ITR 112 · 1963 · SC
- Bannalal Jat Constructions (P) Ltd. v. ACIT183 citing106 Taxmann.com 128 · 2019 · SC
- 49 ITR 112 (SC) Sreelekh Banerjee v. CIT 1-10 285 citing69 Taxmann.com 219 · 2016 · SC
- 552 (SC) Zaveri Diamonds v. CIT 11-12 362 citing118 Taxmann.com 166 · 2020 · HC
- 49 ITR 112 (SC) Sreelekhal3anerjee v. CIT 253 citing25 Taxmann.com 552 · 2012 · SC
- 166 (Delhi) Ravinder Kumar v. ITO 15-20 532 citing36 Taxmann.com 513 · 2013 · HC
- 315 (Mumbai- Trib.) Ms. Chhaya P. Gangar v. Deputy 75-95 Commissioner of Income-tax 1026 citing88 Taxmann.com 700 · 2017 · HC
- Shrinath Corporation v. DCIT, Central Circle-02, Jaipur 924 citing82 Taxmann.com 315 · 2017
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 117/JP/2020
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,
सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेज. त्महपेजतंत
More judgments on Section 145(3)
- M/S. Sarvesh Mercantile Private Limited… vs DCIT Central Circle 2(1), MumbaiITA 1952/MUM/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- M/S. Sarvesh Mercantile Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 1951/MUM/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- M/S. Sarvesh Mercantile Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 1950/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax… vs Pacifica India Projects Private Limited…ITA 2336/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax… vs Pacifica Builders Private Limited, AhmedabadITA 2335/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Suryansh Chawda vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Yash Shilawat vs. State Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Pushpa Devi Verma vs. State Bank Of INDIA Through Its Chief ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Ayan Khan vs. Bandhan BankMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026