Bannalal Jat Constructions (P) Ltd. v. ACIT

106 Taxmann.com 128Supreme Court of India2019#514 most cited

What is Bannalal Jat Constructions (P) Ltd. v. ACIT authority for?

An addition based on a statement made by an assessee's director during search proceedings is upheld unless the assessee discharges the burden to prove the admission was wrong or extracted under duress and coercion.

183

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Bannalal Jat Constructions P Ltd v ACIT · Section 132(4) statement · admission during search proceedings · retraction of statement · duress or coercion · burden of proof for retraction · search assessment additions · incriminating material · Supreme Court decision

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Bannalal Jat Constructions (P) Ltd. v. ACIT

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, PANAJI, PANAJI, GOA vs. BAGKIYA CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD, GOA

The appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed in aforestated terms

ITA 148/PAN/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliassessment Years: 2017-2018 Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle, Panaji, Goa. . . . . . . . Appellant V/S M/S Bagkiya Construction Pvt. Ltd. Sf-3, Building No.-3. Techno Cidade, Chogam Rd., Alto Porvorim, Goa-403521. Pan: Aaccb9382M . . . . . . . Respondent Represented Assessee By: None For The Respondent Revenue By: Mr Senthil Kumar [‘Ld. Dr’] Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 29/01/2026 Date Of Pronouncement : 27/02/2026 Order Per G. D. Padmahshali; This Revenue’S Appeal Filed U/S 253(2) Of The Income- Tax Act, 1961 [‘The Act’] Challenges The Order Dt. 29/05/2023 Passed U/S 250 Of The Act By Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals-2), Panaji [‘Ld. Cit(A)’] Which In Turn Wheeled From The Order Dt. 25/08/2021 Passed U/S 147 Of The Act By Acit, Central Circle, Panaji, Goa [‘Ld. Ao’] Anent To Assessment Year 2017-18.[‘Ay’]

For Appellant: None for theFor Respondent: Mr Senthil Kumar [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 127(2)Section 131Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 253(2)

…nted by admission. And to drive home the reversal of impugned deletion the Revenue relied heavily on the decision in the case of ‘Seasons Catering Services (P) Ltd. Vs DCIT’ [2010, 117 ITD 50 (Del-ITAT)] and ‘Bannalal Jat Construction (P) Ltd. Vs ACIT’ [2019, 106 Taxmann.com 128 (SC)]. ITAT-Panaji Page 27 of 39 ACIT Vs M/s Bagkiya Construction Pvt. Ltd. ITA No. 148/PAN/2025 AY: 2017-18 16. Per contra the respondent assessee vide its written submission dt. 09/02/2026 reiterated its contentions & arguments as were laid before the Ld. CIT(A) that, (i) the diary from which impugned addition was made does not belong…

AMIT KUMAR PAL,THRISSUR vs. WARD 1(1) THRISSUR, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 676/COCH/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Nov 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am Assessment Year: 2022-23 Amit Kumar Pal .......... Appellant House No. 31/321/1, Vakayil Road St. Marys Chappal, Chiyyaram, Thrissur [Pan: Bnhpp5857P] Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Wd-1(1), Thrissur .......... Respondent Assessee By: Shri Anoop V. Francis, Ca Revenue By: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 06.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 20.11.2025 O R D E R This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [Cit(A)] Dated 30.07.2025 For Assessment Year (Ay) 2022-23. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Appellant Is An Individual Doing Job Work As Goldsmith. The Return Of Income For Ay 2022-23 Was Filed On 30.12.2022 Declaring Income Of Rs. 6,82,690/-. The Search & Seizure Operations U/S. 132 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act) Were Conducted In The Business Premises Of M/S. Peeyar Exporters In The Month Of March, 2022. During The Course Of Search & Seizure Operations Certain Digital Evidences Were Found

For Appellant: Shri Anoop V. Francis, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 44A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM Assessment Year: 2022-23 Amit Kumar Pal .......... Appellant House No. 31/321/1, Vakayil Road St. Marys Chappal, Chiyyaram, Thrissur [PAN: BNHPP5857P] vs. The Income Tax Officer, WD-1(1), Thrissur .......... Respondent Assessee by: Shri Anoop V. Francis, CA Revenue by: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing: 06.11.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 20.11.2025 O R D E R This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 30.07.2025 for Assessment Year (AY) 2022-23.…

Showing 120 of 183 · Page 1 of 10

...